Jump to content

Recommended Posts

FelicityNormal Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The person has not been identified, so no.

>


The mere fact that the person has not been identified by name does not protect either the forum or the person making the statements - if sufficient information is given to cause people to suspect the identity of the person, that can be enough to found libel. "Blind vice" items in newspapers/gossip mags have been the subject of proceedings and substantial settlements.


More importantly IMHO, this is community website, run not for profit by Admin and his team. Several local businesses and individuals have threatened legal action (and even taken action in one case I think?) against them because of ill-judged and highly personal comments made in threads like this one - leading to other members having to offer free legal advice and a whole heap of further admin and trouble. This is going to sound horribly preachy (and I really wish it didn't) but is this really what the forum is here for?

FelicityNormal Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This individual has not had the chance to give me

> anything as I turned him down but I've since

> discovered that he's been with two local women I

> know and one of them now has health problems as a

> result. Wondering if he is purposely trying to

> harm people or he is just randy as hell and being

> reckless.


Or "loose" Women perhaps?!

FelicityNormal Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It seems I was wrong. There is not a Local

> shop-owning Lothario....there are several of them,

> all shagging wildly in and around LL. >:D<


That's all right then - so you aren't accusing someone of deliberately spreading a STD.

One of these trouser-dropping individuals has given a local woman a serious STD. Allegedly this man is very aggressive in his approach and has shagged several other local women recently, despite being married. He has tried it on with me but I did not succumb yet - and with what I now know, I will never succumb. It is not clear whether he is deliberately spreading his STD or whether he is just reckless as to who he gives it to. It is said he claims he no longer shags his wife (which may be true).


In the course of my 'investigatins' I have also stumbled across several other randy local shopkeepers who are also married and also shagging for England. Some local women are not able to even enter certain ED establishments unless accompanied by a male friend, otherwise there rogering shopkeepers will ooze into lecherous overdrive.


Cassius Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> FelicityNormal Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It seems I was wrong. There is not a Local

> > shop-owning Lothario....there are several of

> them,

> > all shagging wildly in and around LL. >:D

> That's all right then - so you aren't accusing

> someone of deliberately spreading a STD.

Were any of these women raped? Did any of these women ask if the man was married? Did any of them insist on using a condom as obviously they did not know this man very well? If a woman shags a man about which she knows nothing or little, without using a condom, then she is taking a risk with her sexual health. 6 of one and half dozen of the other IMO.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But is it the Village councillors who are maintaining the board, or someone else? When the boards in East Dulwich were installed, it wasn't the councillors who kept the information up to date, it was Monica from Health Matters, who was greatly involved in various  community matters (eg the building of the community garden at what was then Dulwich Hospital). I can't remember if it was her who initiated the installation of the boards in the first place. She no longer lives in East Dulwich, and nobody else appears to be willing to liaise with the councillors and community related organisations  to take this on for the various East Dulwich boards.  It would hardly take much effort. Basic information doesn't frequently change (and no, I'm not volunteering. I am overstretched as it is). It's all very well to  get a physical  community notice board spruced up, but not much use if it then isn't being used for its intended purpose. And I can't see that it is part of a councillor's job to update notice boards which they didn't initiate in the first place. I'm sure they have more than enough to do.  The notice boards serve (or did do) a useful service, but all the information which could be put on them is surely available elsewhere. (Unless it is bringing to people's attention things which are of use/interest to them and they weren't aware they needed/would like, or didn't know how else to find the information). ETA: Oh. I've just read the beginning of this thread. I'd forgotten how it started. It's gone well off topic, hasn't it. Probably just as well, reading the OP.
    • The board in the Village (just near the pub) is in pristine condition, full of council-related information (though someone had stuck a flyer on the glass, now removed). Maybe the councillors there actually CBA to make use of a facility that took time, effort and taxpayers’ money to instal?  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...