Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was surprised at that as earlier in this thread

> quids said it was me!


But Sean, ???? doesn't know anything about this so if he said it was you, that is clearly a joke. If the OP says that the 'Lothario' is posting on this thread and then suggests he is ????, I can understand that he should take offence. She has now made it clear that she was joking, but the whole thing continues to be very baffling to me.


If the OP has now collected all the 'evidence' she needs from PMs and so on I suggest that this thread be locked and that those people who know what's going on continue a private conversation. To suggest that 'a shopkeeper of Lordship Lane' is a wrong'un casts doubt on all the shopkeepers of LL, and that makes me uncomfortable.

Hve PM'd you


moving2dulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm glad women are being warned about this man. He

> comes over as nice but he is disgusting. He

> believes all British women are whores and is very

> forceful.

Life threatening STD.... HIV?

or one of the curable STD's?


If this is to do with someone who is HIV positive then we are talking about a very serious matter, even a criminal offence, though not sure here but seem to remember that has been a court case (or maybe there have been a few) where a man who was HIV positive (who had intentional withheld the information from a sexual partner) who had in turn infected the woman... pretty certain he got a prison sentence.

LegalEagle-ish Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I disagree - why should the thread be locked?

>

> I think the subject should be changed to 'Evidence

> needed to prosecute possible sex offender in ED'

> though.


LE, if there's a sex offender in ED, someone needs to go to the police with evidence. If people are in danger, then they need to be warned - and not just with mysterious dark hints that cast doubts on lots of innocent people - including all the men who have posted on this thread, and all the male shopkeepers of LL!


Let's assume for an instant that this is all true. The people who know what's going on are not saying anything useful to the people who don't know. They are PMing, because they are concerned not to provide details. The people who don't know are just speculating. So what's the value of a public discussion when nothing real is being said?

PM'd you


charliecharlie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Life threatening STD.... HIV?

> or one of the curable STD's?

>

> If this is to do with someone who is HIV positive

> then we are talking about a very serious matter,

> even a criminal offence, though not sure here but

> seem to remember that has been a court case (or

> maybe there have been a few) where a man who was

> HIV positive (who had intentional withheld the

> information from a sexual partner) who had in turn

> infected the woman... pretty certain he got a

> prison sentence.

The majority of the business owners in Dulwich are lovely, I have known most of them since childhood and they make my whole shopping experience lovely. You only need to worry if you PERSONALLY are being hassled.

I am sure Felicity has managed to get all the info she needs and thus the thread has been useful and helped her to collect her evidences.

Charlie - yes I can't remember the case but it was assault after a guy knowingly infected his gf with HIV.


And Moos - it's important in anything like this to have as much evidence as possible before ging to the police - so if that is Felicity's motive then it seems justifable to me,

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry Heidi and Chav - I can only tell certain

> people.

>

> I'm sure you understand.



No worries, it is like my childhood days, I always got left out!:(

Chav? I didn't know Chav posted on this thread.

FelicityNormal Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The thing that is shocking me is that so far there

> are five or more different shops all with male

> staff women on here say have behaved

> inappropriately towards them


What exactly do you mean "inappropriately" - are we talking the same level as the STD/Aggressive Lothario? When you discount Estate Agents / Restaurants / Pubs as not being Shops - plus it's ALL male staff, it sort of does point the finger!?!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
    • Hello! I'm looking for a talented, affordable people photographer to do headshots for my start up's website, for 4 people. If you're keen I'd love to see examples of your work please. Many thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...