Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was surprised at that as earlier in this thread

> quids said it was me!


But Sean, ???? doesn't know anything about this so if he said it was you, that is clearly a joke. If the OP says that the 'Lothario' is posting on this thread and then suggests he is ????, I can understand that he should take offence. She has now made it clear that she was joking, but the whole thing continues to be very baffling to me.


If the OP has now collected all the 'evidence' she needs from PMs and so on I suggest that this thread be locked and that those people who know what's going on continue a private conversation. To suggest that 'a shopkeeper of Lordship Lane' is a wrong'un casts doubt on all the shopkeepers of LL, and that makes me uncomfortable.

Hve PM'd you


moving2dulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm glad women are being warned about this man. He

> comes over as nice but he is disgusting. He

> believes all British women are whores and is very

> forceful.

Life threatening STD.... HIV?

or one of the curable STD's?


If this is to do with someone who is HIV positive then we are talking about a very serious matter, even a criminal offence, though not sure here but seem to remember that has been a court case (or maybe there have been a few) where a man who was HIV positive (who had intentional withheld the information from a sexual partner) who had in turn infected the woman... pretty certain he got a prison sentence.

LegalEagle-ish Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I disagree - why should the thread be locked?

>

> I think the subject should be changed to 'Evidence

> needed to prosecute possible sex offender in ED'

> though.


LE, if there's a sex offender in ED, someone needs to go to the police with evidence. If people are in danger, then they need to be warned - and not just with mysterious dark hints that cast doubts on lots of innocent people - including all the men who have posted on this thread, and all the male shopkeepers of LL!


Let's assume for an instant that this is all true. The people who know what's going on are not saying anything useful to the people who don't know. They are PMing, because they are concerned not to provide details. The people who don't know are just speculating. So what's the value of a public discussion when nothing real is being said?

PM'd you


charliecharlie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Life threatening STD.... HIV?

> or one of the curable STD's?

>

> If this is to do with someone who is HIV positive

> then we are talking about a very serious matter,

> even a criminal offence, though not sure here but

> seem to remember that has been a court case (or

> maybe there have been a few) where a man who was

> HIV positive (who had intentional withheld the

> information from a sexual partner) who had in turn

> infected the woman... pretty certain he got a

> prison sentence.

The majority of the business owners in Dulwich are lovely, I have known most of them since childhood and they make my whole shopping experience lovely. You only need to worry if you PERSONALLY are being hassled.

I am sure Felicity has managed to get all the info she needs and thus the thread has been useful and helped her to collect her evidences.

Charlie - yes I can't remember the case but it was assault after a guy knowingly infected his gf with HIV.


And Moos - it's important in anything like this to have as much evidence as possible before ging to the police - so if that is Felicity's motive then it seems justifable to me,

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry Heidi and Chav - I can only tell certain

> people.

>

> I'm sure you understand.



No worries, it is like my childhood days, I always got left out!:(

Chav? I didn't know Chav posted on this thread.

FelicityNormal Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The thing that is shocking me is that so far there

> are five or more different shops all with male

> staff women on here say have behaved

> inappropriately towards them


What exactly do you mean "inappropriately" - are we talking the same level as the STD/Aggressive Lothario? When you discount Estate Agents / Restaurants / Pubs as not being Shops - plus it's ALL male staff, it sort of does point the finger!?!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I don't really care about political sleaze in this  i am more concerned about thjle ability to run.a country without running it into the ground. Currently, labout seem to be heading straight towards the rocks, ignoring the warning blasts from the economic ighthouse. 
    • Which is exactly why Rayner had to go - don't be the sleaze attack dog and then not keep your own house in order - the really shocking fact is she didn't go the moment this came to light because she knew what advice, and the advice to seek proper tax expertise that was given to her in writing by the very people she was trying to throw under the bus - she clearly thought she might be able to spin her way out of it. When you look at the facts, the advice she was given and when and her behaviour in the last few days it has been scandalous and just shows the contempt for the public intelligence some politicians have. Interesting to see a very unscientific vox pop on BBC News last night but a lot of her own constituents seem to want rid of her as well and to be honest if you have to lose your cabinet role for this breach of the rules then you should probably lose your seat too. That is the hypocrisy here and why a lot of people don't like politicians because they're all the same.
    • Hi all, I’m after a stereo amp in working condition. Not necessarily anything fancy, as long as it works. Thanks
    • You are missing my point, there are a few here who are rabidly anti Labour.  And have lost sight of the many scandals associated with their party.  I've not made excuses for Rayner, rather I am inferring that it is hypocritical to go on about one of the major parties whilst ignoring your own dirty washing.   You are not making sense.  I expect half the country likes a drink and a sizeable number likes a vape.  What is your point?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...