Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Trains are running past Blackfriars this morning, I'm on the delayed 8.01 and it's busy but not crazy rammed, there was a Blackfriars train also scheduled to stop at pr at 8.10. Let's hope the flood issue is resolved and things get back to normal!

Strawbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Trains are running past Blackfriars this morning,

> I'm on the delayed 8.01 and it's busy but not

> crazy rammed, there was a Blackfriars train also

> scheduled to stop at pr at 8.10. Let's hope the

> flood issue is resolved and things get back to

> normal!


9:04 was rammed - only 4 carriages - but everybody squeezed on, just.

Strawbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I missed the 42 by 10 seconds so I can vouch for

> them leaving!! Then stood in the pi$$ing hail

> waiting for a 63 (yes I know I am moaning), anyhow

> bus was rammed but kudos to the driver who took as

> many of us as possible and Then bus cleared not

> long after at a tube station (sorry no idea which

> one but only a few stops after Blackfriars) so if

> you can hold on for a few stops then you are

> away..



It'll be Southwark.


Sometimes I catch a (pretty empty) bus to Waterloo - pint :)

- then 63 from there.

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> So why is this line so much worse than others? Has

> it been cursed by black magic?


To be fair, services into London Bridge are screwed and the East London line has been extremely unreliable too.


It's almost as though the regular above inflation fare hikes and huge public subsidies are being used to generate dividends for shareholders, rather than to provide a public service.

"So why is this line so much worse than others? Has it been cursed by black magic?"


It's obvious surely - this line runs through Farringdon which has had a SHEDLOAD of work done to the whole area over many years. Looks like that work has taken a toll and the flooding in that area is having knock on effects through the line


It's hardly black magic

I've just fired off an email on the consultation paper telling them that the Sevenoaks service really does need extra trains to cope with the increased demand. The email address is [email protected] if anyone has the chance to do the same today.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "So why is this line so much worse than others?

> Has it been cursed by black magic?"

>

> It's obvious surely - this line runs through

> Farringdon which has had a SHEDLOAD of work done

> to the whole area over many years. Looks like that

> work has taken a toll and the flooding in that

> area is having knock on effects through the line

>

> It's hardly black magic



There were definitely problems before the floods - I attributed it to knock on effects from London Bridge.


Govia have apologised for all the issues and blamed the weather and ongoing improvement projects.


http://www.stalbansreview.co.uk/news/11534463.Govia_Thameslink_forced_to_apologise_after_complaints_of__endless_delays_and_huge_system_failures_/?ref=mr


"During questioning, senior management from GTR admitted that performance of the Thameslink service had been in decline since September 2013. They said this had continued after GTR took over the franchise on 14 September 2014. They explained that the deterioration was due to a combination of poor weather and a number of incidents and project work along the route."


http://www.stalbans.gov.uk/council-and-democracy/press-room/items/2014/december/concern-expressed-about-deterioration-of-thameslink-service.aspx


Its strange that all the action about thameslink is coming from St Albans - or thats what searches seem to take me to.

So back to a normal service this morning: 9:01 from Nunhead broadly on time, but only 4 carriages, no warning, people left on platform. 9:14 was 20 minutes late, again 4 carriages with no warning, people left on platform. 9:29 about 7 or 8 minutes late, 4 carriages as normal, btu got everyone on. Govia claiming this was due to lack of rolling stock due to water damage from flood. But judging by Twitter this impacted almost all services on every line: people at Tulse Hill said 6 trains in a run were running short.


Oh and it's not just Thameslink: the 9:11 Victoria train was also cancelled.

It is abysmal.


I have given up going to Peckham Rye and waiting on a platform for a late train only then to not physically be able to cram myself onto a packed train. It's ridiculous and quite depressing. Even if you do manage to jam on it is extremely unpleasant standing squashed from all sides with someone breathing in your face from about a foot away, because they are jammed in next to you.

Yup - back to normal again. 8:36 arrived 10 minutes late this morning and packed solid. About to head home from Farringdon but National Rail reckons the 6:33 is 23 minutes late. Looks like an hour on the 63 it is then. Hopefully the Radio 4 segment will raise awareness of this shambles...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The tenant's business has already failed. If the landlord doesn't accept it, they can have a vacant property, stand in the queue of creditors, and get paid little or nothing. It's a gamble that the restructuring will work and the tenant will start paying rent again. Commercial properties are often hard to let. 🤷
    • An inquiry will put a huge amount of time and resource into looking at what happened in the past and why it happened and who was responsible and, in a year or two maybe more, a report will be produced and actions may or may not be taken, some of those responsible for bad decisions will already have resigned and moved on.   Given that we now already understand some of the issues that allowed this awful behaviour to continue unchallenged, my concern is less about whether there is an inquiry to examine what happened in the past but about what is being done right now to protect girls and young women from predatory and exploitative men in whatever race or identity they come in. Inquiries examine the past but don't necessarily solve problems and they certainly don't come up with conclusions quickly which is why they can often feel hollow.  I'd rather see perpetrators and those that let the perpetrators act with impunity, actually being prosecuted and an inquiry won't do that.  I suspect that's why some MPs voted against an inquiry. But do feel free to give me examples of inquiries that really made a difference and actually changed things in a timely and effective way.      
    • In recent consultation on further ED CPZ the majority of respondents were against. Fully appreciate you may not live on a road proposed for CPZ. If you are close to that area it is likely you will be affected by parking displacement if the CPZ goes in. I was just curious what James Barber's position on this is? Perhaps he'll come on here and let us know. He was always really good at visiting the forum.
    • huh  angry not at AII i think its  awsome to name n shame them  . as for me being right wing im very proud of it . does that mke yyou mad n get your BIood presure riseing?  sureIy you dont support chiId grooming or do you  ? i mean tommy robinson did teII you This was happening many yeras ago and of course there reaction was the same as yours .IabIed right wing and racist. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...