Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Trains are running past Blackfriars this morning, I'm on the delayed 8.01 and it's busy but not crazy rammed, there was a Blackfriars train also scheduled to stop at pr at 8.10. Let's hope the flood issue is resolved and things get back to normal!

Strawbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Trains are running past Blackfriars this morning,

> I'm on the delayed 8.01 and it's busy but not

> crazy rammed, there was a Blackfriars train also

> scheduled to stop at pr at 8.10. Let's hope the

> flood issue is resolved and things get back to

> normal!


9:04 was rammed - only 4 carriages - but everybody squeezed on, just.

Strawbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I missed the 42 by 10 seconds so I can vouch for

> them leaving!! Then stood in the pi$$ing hail

> waiting for a 63 (yes I know I am moaning), anyhow

> bus was rammed but kudos to the driver who took as

> many of us as possible and Then bus cleared not

> long after at a tube station (sorry no idea which

> one but only a few stops after Blackfriars) so if

> you can hold on for a few stops then you are

> away..



It'll be Southwark.


Sometimes I catch a (pretty empty) bus to Waterloo - pint :)

- then 63 from there.

James Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> So why is this line so much worse than others? Has

> it been cursed by black magic?


To be fair, services into London Bridge are screwed and the East London line has been extremely unreliable too.


It's almost as though the regular above inflation fare hikes and huge public subsidies are being used to generate dividends for shareholders, rather than to provide a public service.

"So why is this line so much worse than others? Has it been cursed by black magic?"


It's obvious surely - this line runs through Farringdon which has had a SHEDLOAD of work done to the whole area over many years. Looks like that work has taken a toll and the flooding in that area is having knock on effects through the line


It's hardly black magic

I've just fired off an email on the consultation paper telling them that the Sevenoaks service really does need extra trains to cope with the increased demand. The email address is [email protected] if anyone has the chance to do the same today.

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "So why is this line so much worse than others?

> Has it been cursed by black magic?"

>

> It's obvious surely - this line runs through

> Farringdon which has had a SHEDLOAD of work done

> to the whole area over many years. Looks like that

> work has taken a toll and the flooding in that

> area is having knock on effects through the line

>

> It's hardly black magic



There were definitely problems before the floods - I attributed it to knock on effects from London Bridge.


Govia have apologised for all the issues and blamed the weather and ongoing improvement projects.


http://www.stalbansreview.co.uk/news/11534463.Govia_Thameslink_forced_to_apologise_after_complaints_of__endless_delays_and_huge_system_failures_/?ref=mr


"During questioning, senior management from GTR admitted that performance of the Thameslink service had been in decline since September 2013. They said this had continued after GTR took over the franchise on 14 September 2014. They explained that the deterioration was due to a combination of poor weather and a number of incidents and project work along the route."


http://www.stalbans.gov.uk/council-and-democracy/press-room/items/2014/december/concern-expressed-about-deterioration-of-thameslink-service.aspx


Its strange that all the action about thameslink is coming from St Albans - or thats what searches seem to take me to.

So back to a normal service this morning: 9:01 from Nunhead broadly on time, but only 4 carriages, no warning, people left on platform. 9:14 was 20 minutes late, again 4 carriages with no warning, people left on platform. 9:29 about 7 or 8 minutes late, 4 carriages as normal, btu got everyone on. Govia claiming this was due to lack of rolling stock due to water damage from flood. But judging by Twitter this impacted almost all services on every line: people at Tulse Hill said 6 trains in a run were running short.


Oh and it's not just Thameslink: the 9:11 Victoria train was also cancelled.

It is abysmal.


I have given up going to Peckham Rye and waiting on a platform for a late train only then to not physically be able to cram myself onto a packed train. It's ridiculous and quite depressing. Even if you do manage to jam on it is extremely unpleasant standing squashed from all sides with someone breathing in your face from about a foot away, because they are jammed in next to you.

Yup - back to normal again. 8:36 arrived 10 minutes late this morning and packed solid. About to head home from Farringdon but National Rail reckons the 6:33 is 23 minutes late. Looks like an hour on the 63 it is then. Hopefully the Radio 4 segment will raise awareness of this shambles...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi All, Looking for recommendations in the following professions. Ideally based locally. -Psychiatrist -Psychologist  -Therapist (EMDR) -Child Psychiatrist ADHD and ASD exp - ideal Any information would be appriciated. C
    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...