Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

geh Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> first plane this morning 3.16 am


First plane is from Hong Kong. It normally lands around 04:30am, but arrives even earlier with tailwinds :-(

By the way, to all these people making no difference whether the Heathrow bound planes fly above us or not, have a listen this morning ! So quiet :-) !

geh Wrote: at 11:39 PM on Fri 3 June

-------------------------------------------------------

> first plane this morning 3.16 am


It doesn't show up on http://webtrak5.bksv.com/lhr4. The first plane shown in our vicinity yesterday morning was LX345 LHR->ZRH, flying east over Thornton Heath at 06:16, at 10,000 feet. There were four more in the following hour, all also eastbound at 5-9,000 feet and no more north than Penge.


http://www.heathrow.com/arrivals shows first arrival BA032 from HK, at 04:49. I went back to Webtrak to check it. It came in over New Barnet and started a U-turn over Marlow to land.

  • 1 month later...

This morning, (3.16)? I awoke thinking the MotherShip was landing on the roof, awful roar.

There is no respite today. I keep windows facing East closed, as the larger planes seem to change gear over Barry Road, hence the screaming engines we oft times hear. And consider the pollution.

flyer22 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> has to be the worst sunday yet we've got them

> every 20-30secs today - have signed the petition

> only 49 signatures left to go


Nonsense.. Planes into Heathrow normally fly 5 miles apart.. but can be as close as 3 miles.


So 5 miles in 20 secs.. 15 miles a min. 900 mph.

3 miles in 20 secs.. 9 miles a min. 540 mph.

I do not think so.


Planes are usually 1.5 - 2 mins apart.


5 miles in 1.5 mins. 200mph

5 miles in 2.0 mins .150pmh



That is more realist for an aircraft on final approach.

DulwichFox

I've timed it before and Fox is right. Around every two minutes peak time Sunday during the summer. Very busy flight path today. Woke me up around 6am this morning and it's been pretty much continuous ever since. It also being very warm and leaving windows open to keep cool doesn't help.

flyer22 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So not nonsense at all then - bit quick off the

> mark there Foxy.


It is nonesense .. did you not read anything others have said..


Every 20 seconds..?? 3 planes a minute. 180 planes an hour..


That IS nonsense


DulwichFox

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Both notoriously “lovely” people to spend any time with or worse, serve 
    • No, just no.  Zero tolerance does not mean we expect zero crime but that we do not accept a standard level as normal and unavoidable. For those who have suffered such “minor” crimes, myself included having had my house broken into,  it is clear from the lack of action that they are considered “acceptable”’. Once small crimes become known to be ignored, it changes where and how we live.     
    • Lloyd Weber and Cilla Black were supposed to leave when Blair got in, but didn't
    • You can't have zero tolerance unless you live in a fascist/police state.  Sadly it is something you have to accept in a democracy.  There has always been crime, even in North Korea, the Soviet bloc, Nazi Germany, Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge etc.   The discussion point is how big a police force we need and capabilities, punishment, and building communities.  And how much we are prepared to pay in extra taxation. Even in the good (economic) times there is crime.  And crime under both Labour and Tory governments. I do not accept that phone thefts and parcel thefts are just statistics.  Police have to prioritise what they do, we might not agree with it.  And most criminals are multi-tasking, moving to where the best return is considering the risk of being caught. And there has to be a market, someone somewhere needs to buy a stolen product (I never buy off Gumtree). A starting point would be to decriminalise all illegal drugs, but that is definitely for a separate Lounge conversation, interesting discussion paper here: https://kar.kent.ac.uk/105520/1/A. Stevens - In defence of the decriminalisation of drug possession in the uk - PPDF.pdf Did you watch any of the series of Peaky Blinders?  This was a very popular series that glorified gang crime and violence.  Funny (ironic) that may enjoy films and TV that does this.  Although only the first series had any historical accuracy in it,  Criminal gangs were around before and ever since.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...