Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi jimbo1964,

Yes, I believe they do. As with just about all GP practices they are and have always been private businesses. So the NHS will have termination clauses in the contract. The contract presumably is prettyy standard and agreed with the BMA - http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/gms-contract-04-14.pdf


I've only briefly scanned clause 26.

Anyone game to read al 126 pages and share their views?

From talking to patients we know there is some confusion and irritation about the triage process. Where patients phone in the morning, they will be called back by a doctor and either be given a same-day appointment, which we do in appropriate cases, or directed to one of our nurses or prescribing pharmacists. We are facing the same systemic pressures as other London and Dulwich GPs, as described by Dr Rosemary Leonard speaking on TV this week. There will be new information going up on the practice website. We find that patients accept the clinical triage and the need to red flag certain symptoms early in the morning, once we explain it to them. Please be assured we are working very hard to deal with the current situation.
But why is there still a 45min wait despite pressing repeated re-dial to get through? Can you tell us what immediate plans are being put in place to get more phone-lines, terminals and staff so your ill clients are not wasting their time and depleted energy to get through to you. I would have thought a couple of week's grace to sort this out should be sufficient. Temp staff booked initially if necessary, technology ordered and installed and three days training.

Agree with SPorthuntor, on MOnday there were no appointments available despite numerous calla sand a long wait on hold between 8 and 8.30.

I did manage to get an appointment today. I do not think the triage system works. My child has not been to the Gp since 2008. I know she is unwell. A doctor would need to see her to determine how ill- Seldoc had already done the phone triage.

One thing that might help DMC is to set their clocks to the right time. Another patient tried to point out that all the clocks there are set 5 minutes slow, and the receptionist really argued about it. Someone else with a phone and a watch set to the right time agreed. No wonder they they think the system is running on time ( per the check in screen at the back) when in fact it is always late.

More doctors, better phone system and more reception staff in at 8. Not that hard.

Question - can anyone confirm the subsidy model (even roughly) for a privately run surgery like DMC?


I'm keen to understand whether they're on borderline margins /break even and struggling with service because of the funding model....or whether the owners are driving around in a Bentley whilst skimming the operating costs right back.

Oh do shut up DMC, you're making yourself look even worse. I've moved twice now. Nunhead surgery were easy to get appointments with, and to get prescriptions from. Streatham High is great, and a huge surgery too. Appointments are easy to get, doctors ring you back and they do prescriptions within 24 hours. Your problems are caused by your greed and shit management. Countless other surrgeries even a few miles Way manage.

Fuschia Wrote: I wonder how many patients there are to each DMC gp


There are 10,564 patients registered at the Crystal Palace Road practice according to this website - http://www.nhs.uk/Service-Search/GP/SE220EQ/Results/4/-0.0704028904438019/51.4513816833496/4/0?distance=25


Although I'm not sure if this figure was before or after people started to be removed from their list.


At a guess I'd say there are usually 3 or 4 GPs working when I go in for an appointment - although this is just based on a vague memory of how many room colours come up when patients are called and might be completely wrong.


Interesting info here on DMC survey results but only 100+ surveys returned it's not a very good sample size for 10,000+ patients - https://gp-patient.co.uk/practices/G85651

Also @DMC it's not just a current situation - it might be slightly worse now but for the past few years I've been regaling friends with tales from DMC - it's comedy gold (or pure farce). For eg waiting over a year to get referred to have a lump investigated - despite requesting it every time I saw a dr - and the hospital saying it needed looking at.


My favourite one at the moment is your claim to have none of my hospital notes since 2013 so are unable to discuss my condition properly after I've queued up outside & taken the day off work to get a Drs appointment and then telling me you can't prescribe my pain relief medication without direction from my consultant (who incidentally is happy for me to be treated symptomatically for pain). Then when I say fine I'll give up the pain relief but can I get support from a pain clinic you change your mind and are happy to prescribe it - presumably because it's less costly.


The amount of frustration I've had with your practice over the past few years has made living with a long term chronic condition a nightmare. GPs might be underfunded but you have wasted loads of money on my care along just from general incompetency. I've had wonderful care from one GP - Dr Prabhakaran - who I worry will burn out as she works so hard within an otherwise broken system. But it's impossible to see her and trying to manage a long term condition when you're only able to see locum after locum is hopeless.

@Mr Ben See http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2063458/Family-doctors-firm-raking-1-8m-YEAR--patients-say-surgery-appalling.html


According to the accounts for the year to March 2014, DMC Healthcare made post-tax profits of ?470k and paid dividends of ?600k. It still had ?1.8m left in cash at year-end though.


How much does a Bentley cost nowadays?

Might be of interest to those on this thread that the CQC started a new inspection programme of GP practices last year. As someone earlier noted they haven't inspected DMC yet, though their latest monitoring report makes for fairly depressing reading http://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/1-565650623%20GP%20IM%20V101.pdf


James is absolutely right to encourage people to complain to NHS England if the practice hasn't responded to complaints themselves adequately. I'd also suggest (I say this as someone who works in healthcare) that you might also want to share concerns with the CQC directly via their website and see if that bumps DMC up the list to be inspected next..... http://www.cqc.org.uk/share-your-experience-finder


Hope that's helpful. Awful to hear such terrible experiences. The NHS is a wonderful thing, but this sort of thing lets everyone down.


Best of luck to james and those of you taking this up with the commissioners.

I've just checked the accounts for DMC Healthcare at Companies House. They are turning over about ?6M, have ?2m cash/assets in the bank and had net profits of ?469K last FY and ?838k the year before. That means they are trading at between 7% to 14% EBITDA which isn't too obscene.


However, it's run by just two directors (the Guptas) and they would have paid lower tax on the ?600k dividends drawn last FY when compared with a PAYE income (as per normal salary) so they probably netted ?220 to ?230k each after tax depending on several other variables. Gross that back up and the equivalent PAYE salary is about ?430k per year. That's a salary many FTSE 250 execs would be happy about. You then have to take a view on whether that drawing is morally or socially appropriate for what is an essential basic public service impacting the wellbeing of over 10,000 men, women and children locally who need it.


Next - think what cutting ?100k off those annual divvies or investing ?100k from their reserves could pay for operationally:


- Another 4-5 operational or clerical staff to answer the phone and manage daily workloads, medical records and patient admin.

- Another full time GP to handle the high workload.

- improved IT systems / phone systems for handling triage and optimising appointments.


If they offered an acceptable service you could almost forgive the profits and drawings but as they clearly do not it is reprehensible and socially, morally and ethically unacceptable.


The funding system needs to be linked to reasonable patient satisfaction metrics- that would encourage improvements all round and prevent these guys thieving from the tax payer/NHS to pay for the ?2-3M+ house in Dulwich village.


The current system is broken and lets this happen. There is enough on here and out there in the ether to keep the producers of Panorama happy - who's going to get in touch?

bawdy-nan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My favourite DMC story, admittedly from a few

> years ago was being told off by a French accented

> GP for still breastfeeding my baby at 6 months ...



My favourite DMC story: being told off for using a private French GP when DMC could not give me an appointment.

I didn't notice that they're both the same figures - does it state anywhere that it's a joint figure?

Sorry I should have checked first (post in haste = repent in leisure!)






Bic Basher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The figure quoted on the NHS Choices site for DMC

> are for both surgeries in Crystal Palace Road and

> Chadwick Road.

Two more points:


1. Where is the corporate governance for a private enterprise that serves the public interest? No truly independent non-exec directors....just two shareholders who happen to also be family. It needs a balance and check mechanism beyond current BMA guidelines.


2. Massive conflict of interests exist with the privately run model - shareholders want to make as much profit as possible for personal gain. To do so they have to cut down operational expenditure to a bare minimum - delivering a woeful public service as a result. Their interests and commercial objectives do not align with those of their 10,000 patients all if whom rely on their service for their basic wellbeing.


This is really basic stuff. Who ever allowed this to happen in the first place?

lilolil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Remember this too. Great community practice????

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?3

> 0,1376505,1376505#msg-1376505



If everybody went to DMC expecting minor ailments to be dealt with immediately, the whole system would collapse completely in a millisecond.


The nearby pharmacy was surely the place to go, for tweezers and anti-histamines?

We were next door to DMC. The child in question had other medical issues,one of which was a mild allergy to bee stings. His lips and tongue were tingling slightly. If we had thought it to be an absolute emergency, then of course we would have rang for an ambulance.

Amazing how some people can be so callous

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...