Jump to content

Dulwich Medical Centre


willwaters

Recommended Posts

Hi jimbo1964,

Yes, I believe they do. As with just about all GP practices they are and have always been private businesses. So the NHS will have termination clauses in the contract. The contract presumably is prettyy standard and agreed with the BMA - http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/gms-contract-04-14.pdf


I've only briefly scanned clause 26.

Anyone game to read al 126 pages and share their views?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From talking to patients we know there is some confusion and irritation about the triage process. Where patients phone in the morning, they will be called back by a doctor and either be given a same-day appointment, which we do in appropriate cases, or directed to one of our nurses or prescribing pharmacists. We are facing the same systemic pressures as other London and Dulwich GPs, as described by Dr Rosemary Leonard speaking on TV this week. There will be new information going up on the practice website. We find that patients accept the clinical triage and the need to red flag certain symptoms early in the morning, once we explain it to them. Please be assured we are working very hard to deal with the current situation.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But why is there still a 45min wait despite pressing repeated re-dial to get through? Can you tell us what immediate plans are being put in place to get more phone-lines, terminals and staff so your ill clients are not wasting their time and depleted energy to get through to you. I would have thought a couple of week's grace to sort this out should be sufficient. Temp staff booked initially if necessary, technology ordered and installed and three days training.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with SPorthuntor, on MOnday there were no appointments available despite numerous calla sand a long wait on hold between 8 and 8.30.

I did manage to get an appointment today. I do not think the triage system works. My child has not been to the Gp since 2008. I know she is unwell. A doctor would need to see her to determine how ill- Seldoc had already done the phone triage.

One thing that might help DMC is to set their clocks to the right time. Another patient tried to point out that all the clocks there are set 5 minutes slow, and the receptionist really argued about it. Someone else with a phone and a watch set to the right time agreed. No wonder they they think the system is running on time ( per the check in screen at the back) when in fact it is always late.

More doctors, better phone system and more reception staff in at 8. Not that hard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question - can anyone confirm the subsidy model (even roughly) for a privately run surgery like DMC?


I'm keen to understand whether they're on borderline margins /break even and struggling with service because of the funding model....or whether the owners are driving around in a Bentley whilst skimming the operating costs right back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh do shut up DMC, you're making yourself look even worse. I've moved twice now. Nunhead surgery were easy to get appointments with, and to get prescriptions from. Streatham High is great, and a huge surgery too. Appointments are easy to get, doctors ring you back and they do prescriptions within 24 hours. Your problems are caused by your greed and shit management. Countless other surrgeries even a few miles Way manage.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fuschia Wrote: I wonder how many patients there are to each DMC gp


There are 10,564 patients registered at the Crystal Palace Road practice according to this website - http://www.nhs.uk/Service-Search/GP/SE220EQ/Results/4/-0.0704028904438019/51.4513816833496/4/0?distance=25


Although I'm not sure if this figure was before or after people started to be removed from their list.


At a guess I'd say there are usually 3 or 4 GPs working when I go in for an appointment - although this is just based on a vague memory of how many room colours come up when patients are called and might be completely wrong.


Interesting info here on DMC survey results but only 100+ surveys returned it's not a very good sample size for 10,000+ patients - https://gp-patient.co.uk/practices/G85651

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also @DMC it's not just a current situation - it might be slightly worse now but for the past few years I've been regaling friends with tales from DMC - it's comedy gold (or pure farce). For eg waiting over a year to get referred to have a lump investigated - despite requesting it every time I saw a dr - and the hospital saying it needed looking at.


My favourite one at the moment is your claim to have none of my hospital notes since 2013 so are unable to discuss my condition properly after I've queued up outside & taken the day off work to get a Drs appointment and then telling me you can't prescribe my pain relief medication without direction from my consultant (who incidentally is happy for me to be treated symptomatically for pain). Then when I say fine I'll give up the pain relief but can I get support from a pain clinic you change your mind and are happy to prescribe it - presumably because it's less costly.


The amount of frustration I've had with your practice over the past few years has made living with a long term chronic condition a nightmare. GPs might be underfunded but you have wasted loads of money on my care along just from general incompetency. I've had wonderful care from one GP - Dr Prabhakaran - who I worry will burn out as she works so hard within an otherwise broken system. But it's impossible to see her and trying to manage a long term condition when you're only able to see locum after locum is hopeless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might be of interest to those on this thread that the CQC started a new inspection programme of GP practices last year. As someone earlier noted they haven't inspected DMC yet, though their latest monitoring report makes for fairly depressing reading http://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/1-565650623%20GP%20IM%20V101.pdf


James is absolutely right to encourage people to complain to NHS England if the practice hasn't responded to complaints themselves adequately. I'd also suggest (I say this as someone who works in healthcare) that you might also want to share concerns with the CQC directly via their website and see if that bumps DMC up the list to be inspected next..... http://www.cqc.org.uk/share-your-experience-finder


Hope that's helpful. Awful to hear such terrible experiences. The NHS is a wonderful thing, but this sort of thing lets everyone down.


Best of luck to james and those of you taking this up with the commissioners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've just checked the accounts for DMC Healthcare at Companies House. They are turning over about ?6M, have ?2m cash/assets in the bank and had net profits of ?469K last FY and ?838k the year before. That means they are trading at between 7% to 14% EBITDA which isn't too obscene.


However, it's run by just two directors (the Guptas) and they would have paid lower tax on the ?600k dividends drawn last FY when compared with a PAYE income (as per normal salary) so they probably netted ?220 to ?230k each after tax depending on several other variables. Gross that back up and the equivalent PAYE salary is about ?430k per year. That's a salary many FTSE 250 execs would be happy about. You then have to take a view on whether that drawing is morally or socially appropriate for what is an essential basic public service impacting the wellbeing of over 10,000 men, women and children locally who need it.


Next - think what cutting ?100k off those annual divvies or investing ?100k from their reserves could pay for operationally:


- Another 4-5 operational or clerical staff to answer the phone and manage daily workloads, medical records and patient admin.

- Another full time GP to handle the high workload.

- improved IT systems / phone systems for handling triage and optimising appointments.


If they offered an acceptable service you could almost forgive the profits and drawings but as they clearly do not it is reprehensible and socially, morally and ethically unacceptable.


The funding system needs to be linked to reasonable patient satisfaction metrics- that would encourage improvements all round and prevent these guys thieving from the tax payer/NHS to pay for the ?2-3M+ house in Dulwich village.


The current system is broken and lets this happen. There is enough on here and out there in the ether to keep the producers of Panorama happy - who's going to get in touch?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bawdy-nan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My favourite DMC story, admittedly from a few

> years ago was being told off by a French accented

> GP for still breastfeeding my baby at 6 months ...



My favourite DMC story: being told off for using a private French GP when DMC could not give me an appointment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't notice that they're both the same figures - does it state anywhere that it's a joint figure?

Sorry I should have checked first (post in haste = repent in leisure!)






Bic Basher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The figure quoted on the NHS Choices site for DMC

> are for both surgeries in Crystal Palace Road and

> Chadwick Road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two more points:


1. Where is the corporate governance for a private enterprise that serves the public interest? No truly independent non-exec directors....just two shareholders who happen to also be family. It needs a balance and check mechanism beyond current BMA guidelines.


2. Massive conflict of interests exist with the privately run model - shareholders want to make as much profit as possible for personal gain. To do so they have to cut down operational expenditure to a bare minimum - delivering a woeful public service as a result. Their interests and commercial objectives do not align with those of their 10,000 patients all if whom rely on their service for their basic wellbeing.


This is really basic stuff. Who ever allowed this to happen in the first place?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lilolil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Remember this too. Great community practice????

>

> http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?3

> 0,1376505,1376505#msg-1376505



If everybody went to DMC expecting minor ailments to be dealt with immediately, the whole system would collapse completely in a millisecond.


The nearby pharmacy was surely the place to go, for tweezers and anti-histamines?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were next door to DMC. The child in question had other medical issues,one of which was a mild allergy to bee stings. His lips and tongue were tingling slightly. If we had thought it to be an absolute emergency, then of course we would have rang for an ambulance.

Amazing how some people can be so callous

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Can someone please explain who "one Dulwich" are?
    • We are actually referred to as "Supporters"...2,100 of us across Dulwich...read and weep! 😉   https://www.onedulwich.uk/supporters   Got it, the one where 64% of respondents in the consultation area said they wanted the measures "returned to their original state". Is that the one you claim had a yes/no response question?   Well I suggest you read up on it as it is an important part of the story of utter mismangement by the councils and this is why so many of us can't work out who is pulling the council's strings on this one because surely you can agree that if the emergency services were knocking on your door for months and months telling you the blocks in the roads were delayihg response times and putting lives at risk you'd do something about it? Pretty negligent not to do so don't you think - if I was a councillor it would not sit well with me?   Careful it could be a Mrs, Miss or Mx One.....   Of course you don't that's because you have strong opinions but hate being asked for detail to.back-up those opinions (especially when it doesn't serve their narrative) and exposes the flaws in your arguments! 😉  As so many of the pro-LTN lobby find to their cost the devil is always in the detail.....
    • Really?  I'm sorry to hear that. What did you order? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...