Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've met him a couple of times too, and he seems a perfectly nice fella.


I have accused him of stirring on here before, and he does get offended quite easily, but he is also quite funny. I hope he returns.


He's done Narnia. Perhaps MiddleEarth next...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > It always amazes me when people get into

> personal

> > disputes on the forum. Surely we all know by

> now

> > that after a couple of posts the best thing to

> do

> > is move on.

>

> Except too many feel that they have to have the

> last word, not wanting to be seen by the wider

> audience as 'losing face'...over to you Mick :)


I'm not letting that lie. Outside now.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I kinda liked Declan/Alan and he was given a bit

> of a hard time over curryclubgate. Is that why he

> left?

>

> Maybe the curry club thread would be better suited

> to the "what's on" section?


What.. move a Thread to another Forum Section after 8 years...


Don't think so.


DulwichFox

There was more than one thread where AM was treated unfairly.

I just wish I'd said something at the time or at least sent him a PM to check he was ok.


Hopefully when he reads this thread he'll realise that the majority of people miss him and want him to return asap.

alas poor declan i knew him weel. Well I met him about 3 times, and a lovely chap, with a delightful wife, he'll be happy enough without grief from the forum.


plus you know, the 'alan medic' is dead, long live the 'alan mice maid'

reading many of RPC posts maybe I'm inured to her tone. She definitely ragged on "Alan" without provocation but most people would normally dismiss her post as over reaction.


Aquarius wants to point fingers at the forum but I suspect the main problem is offline

My reasons for missing him are entirely selfish, splendid chap though he is - a regular on the betting thread, regular on FF (and a fan of BFS) and a worthy adversary in the 100s game. Plus, one less sniper to hit the next 100 on the CC thread..... which will make it harder


wot SJ said, I suspect

StraferJack Wrote:

----------------------------------------------------

>

> Aquarius wants to point fingers at the forum but I

> suspect the main problem is offline



Maybe, but adding fuel to the fire doesn't help does it?!

But such is life AQ surely?


All of us post on here knowing full well we may encounter people and opinions which may not be helpful to us (and vice versa) but we still do it. Sometimes it all becomes a bit much and we step away


And that's not only ok, but probably a good thing

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Amazing. Now could you cut and paste an AI summary of the defence case for Andrew M-W? 
    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...