Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Christ. What can you possibly say in response? Now might be the time for BBW to invoke king cnut.


Excommunicated? Well they're well rid of such a despicable fucking cunt of an archbishop and if the pope comes out in defence of this, or arguably worse, keeps quiet, then I can only hope that that signals a death knell for catholicism around the world. Although of course it won't/


There are no words of anger or disgust that adequately express how I feel about this.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5535-now-im-mad/#findComment-177916
Share on other sites

That's just beyond disgusting. I know that this is nowhere near the same ballpark, but when I was a child our priest (catholic) would not baptise babies born out of wedlock. The catholic church preaches that you can't enter the the Kingdom of Heaven un-baptised. So if this teaching was correct it was a terribly punishment for the baby. Like I said, nowhere in the same ballpark, but it's what I grew up with.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5535-now-im-mad/#findComment-177966
Share on other sites

I'm no Fidei Defensor, far from it in fact, but isn't paedophile scum a little harsh?


Be interesting to see how the ecclesiastical authorities react to this. They got it woefully wrong on that Bishop in Argentina, let's see if the arch-conservative pope wassisname can feck it up again.


Here's hoping.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5535-now-im-mad/#findComment-178006
Share on other sites

Nothing to be offended by - think I'd remembered your having used the wording "cnut" elsewhere (although forgive me if I'm mistaken - had had some ale last night and didn't bother to do a search).


Was simply meaning that I felt that this was a circumstance that fully warrants that level of language.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5535-now-im-mad/#findComment-178143
Share on other sites

Oh I wasn't offended Rosie just a bit puzzled as to what you meant.


Appart from the Archbishop the lawyer for Recife and Olinda Marcio Miranda is also a cnut of ocean going proportion for recommending a caesarean birth of twins from a body that at that age in a banana republic like Brazil has little chance of surviving.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5535-now-im-mad/#findComment-178151
Share on other sites

What I don?t get is why if the catholic church is so evil, being excommunicated is so bad?


And also why in a story with two villains ? one a priest who excommunicates some people from a church (whatever that actually means, I don?t really know) and one a stepfather who repeatedly abuses a stepchild, it?s the priest/church that is filth, disgusting, vile, revolting, despicable and peadophile scum?


(for the avoidance of doubt here, i don't think that the doctors or mother acting badly on the facts as i know them, but i think that using this story as an excuse for an outpouring of hatred against a faith followed by approx 1/6th of the world's population (to some degree) is a bit OTT)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5535-now-im-mad/#findComment-178173
Share on other sites

pk, I think it goes without saying that everyone on here thinks a rapist paedophile stepfather is disgusting scum.


What is even more shocking in this scenario is that the church, which should be a source of succour in times of crisis, is villifying the very people who are trying to help this child.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5535-now-im-mad/#findComment-178176
Share on other sites

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> What is even more shocking in this scenario is

> that the church, which should be a source of

> succour in times of crisis, is villifying the very

> people who are trying to help this child.


how is it a shock that the catholic church comes out against abortion?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5535-now-im-mad/#findComment-178178
Share on other sites

I'm inclined to agree pk.


It's not unlike Jehova's witnesses who'd rather die than have a blood transfusion.


Religious rules aren't there to be broken by pathetic little things like compassion, humanity or logic, they are hard and fast things that result in heaven or hell.


Seen from that point of view it's we heathens who are stupid and doomed, and the archibishop who's trying to prevent more souls condemned to hell in future.


Can't have your cake and eat it you know.


Mind you fucking stupid cunts!!!!!!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5535-now-im-mad/#findComment-178188
Share on other sites

pk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What I don?t get is why if the catholic church is

> so evil, being excommunicated is so bad?

>

> And also why in a story with two villains ? one a

> priest who excommunicates some people from a

> church (whatever that actually means, I don?t

> really know) and one a stepfather who repeatedly

> abuses a stepchild, it?s the priest/church that is

> filth, disgusting, vile, revolting, despicable and

> peadophile scum?

>

> (for the avoidance of doubt here, i don't think

> that the doctors or mother acting badly on the

> facts as i know them, but i think that using this

> story as an excuse for an outpouring of hatred

> against a faith followed by approx 1/6th of the

> world's population (to some degree) is a bit OTT)



Yes, effectively forcing people to live their lives in abject fear of God and the chuch, and adhering to a dark ages outlook on life is such a plus point innit - those papal coffers dont fill themselves you know.


Hushing up sex abuse cases is probabaly another slur on a noble institution as well


And I wont even make any reference to the Lateran pact, cos that will invoke that law about calling someone a Nazi that some deluded fools think instantly devalues whatever point you may have made


And El papa isnt an ex Nazi either Im sure



OTT ?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5535-now-im-mad/#findComment-178193
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So irrespective of the scandal how do you think that Rayner did as Housing Secretary?  
    • The Labour astro-turfers are out in force on this thread aren't they!
    • I don't really care about political sleaze in this  i am more concerned about thjle ability to run.a country without running it into the ground. Currently, labout seem to be heading straight towards the rocks, ignoring the warning blasts from the economic ighthouse. 
    • Which is exactly why Rayner had to go - don't be the sleaze attack dog and then not keep your own house in order - the really shocking fact is she didn't go the moment this came to light because she knew what advice, and the advice to seek proper tax expertise that was given to her in writing by the very people she was trying to throw under the bus - she clearly thought she might be able to spin her way out of it. When you look at the facts, the advice she was given and when and her behaviour in the last few days it has been scandalous and just shows the contempt for the public intelligence some politicians have. Interesting to see a very unscientific vox pop on BBC News last night but a lot of her own constituents seem to want rid of her as well and to be honest if you have to lose your cabinet role for this breach of the rules then you should probably lose your seat too. That is the hypocrisy here and why a lot of people don't like politicians because they're all the same.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...