Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Christ. What can you possibly say in response? Now might be the time for BBW to invoke king cnut.


Excommunicated? Well they're well rid of such a despicable fucking cunt of an archbishop and if the pope comes out in defence of this, or arguably worse, keeps quiet, then I can only hope that that signals a death knell for catholicism around the world. Although of course it won't/


There are no words of anger or disgust that adequately express how I feel about this.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5535-now-im-mad/#findComment-177916
Share on other sites

That's just beyond disgusting. I know that this is nowhere near the same ballpark, but when I was a child our priest (catholic) would not baptise babies born out of wedlock. The catholic church preaches that you can't enter the the Kingdom of Heaven un-baptised. So if this teaching was correct it was a terribly punishment for the baby. Like I said, nowhere in the same ballpark, but it's what I grew up with.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5535-now-im-mad/#findComment-177966
Share on other sites

I'm no Fidei Defensor, far from it in fact, but isn't paedophile scum a little harsh?


Be interesting to see how the ecclesiastical authorities react to this. They got it woefully wrong on that Bishop in Argentina, let's see if the arch-conservative pope wassisname can feck it up again.


Here's hoping.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5535-now-im-mad/#findComment-178006
Share on other sites

Nothing to be offended by - think I'd remembered your having used the wording "cnut" elsewhere (although forgive me if I'm mistaken - had had some ale last night and didn't bother to do a search).


Was simply meaning that I felt that this was a circumstance that fully warrants that level of language.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5535-now-im-mad/#findComment-178143
Share on other sites

Oh I wasn't offended Rosie just a bit puzzled as to what you meant.


Appart from the Archbishop the lawyer for Recife and Olinda Marcio Miranda is also a cnut of ocean going proportion for recommending a caesarean birth of twins from a body that at that age in a banana republic like Brazil has little chance of surviving.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5535-now-im-mad/#findComment-178151
Share on other sites

What I don?t get is why if the catholic church is so evil, being excommunicated is so bad?


And also why in a story with two villains ? one a priest who excommunicates some people from a church (whatever that actually means, I don?t really know) and one a stepfather who repeatedly abuses a stepchild, it?s the priest/church that is filth, disgusting, vile, revolting, despicable and peadophile scum?


(for the avoidance of doubt here, i don't think that the doctors or mother acting badly on the facts as i know them, but i think that using this story as an excuse for an outpouring of hatred against a faith followed by approx 1/6th of the world's population (to some degree) is a bit OTT)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5535-now-im-mad/#findComment-178173
Share on other sites

pk, I think it goes without saying that everyone on here thinks a rapist paedophile stepfather is disgusting scum.


What is even more shocking in this scenario is that the church, which should be a source of succour in times of crisis, is villifying the very people who are trying to help this child.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5535-now-im-mad/#findComment-178176
Share on other sites

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> What is even more shocking in this scenario is

> that the church, which should be a source of

> succour in times of crisis, is villifying the very

> people who are trying to help this child.


how is it a shock that the catholic church comes out against abortion?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5535-now-im-mad/#findComment-178178
Share on other sites

I'm inclined to agree pk.


It's not unlike Jehova's witnesses who'd rather die than have a blood transfusion.


Religious rules aren't there to be broken by pathetic little things like compassion, humanity or logic, they are hard and fast things that result in heaven or hell.


Seen from that point of view it's we heathens who are stupid and doomed, and the archibishop who's trying to prevent more souls condemned to hell in future.


Can't have your cake and eat it you know.


Mind you fucking stupid cunts!!!!!!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5535-now-im-mad/#findComment-178188
Share on other sites

pk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What I don?t get is why if the catholic church is

> so evil, being excommunicated is so bad?

>

> And also why in a story with two villains ? one a

> priest who excommunicates some people from a

> church (whatever that actually means, I don?t

> really know) and one a stepfather who repeatedly

> abuses a stepchild, it?s the priest/church that is

> filth, disgusting, vile, revolting, despicable and

> peadophile scum?

>

> (for the avoidance of doubt here, i don't think

> that the doctors or mother acting badly on the

> facts as i know them, but i think that using this

> story as an excuse for an outpouring of hatred

> against a faith followed by approx 1/6th of the

> world's population (to some degree) is a bit OTT)



Yes, effectively forcing people to live their lives in abject fear of God and the chuch, and adhering to a dark ages outlook on life is such a plus point innit - those papal coffers dont fill themselves you know.


Hushing up sex abuse cases is probabaly another slur on a noble institution as well


And I wont even make any reference to the Lateran pact, cos that will invoke that law about calling someone a Nazi that some deluded fools think instantly devalues whatever point you may have made


And El papa isnt an ex Nazi either Im sure



OTT ?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5535-now-im-mad/#findComment-178193
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.”
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
    • Very sorry to hear this, but surely the landlord is responsible for fixing the electrics?  Surely they must be insured for things like this? I hope you get it all sorted out quickly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...