Jump to content

Recommended Posts

ok-maybe the link i made is somewhat tenuous, but i did say "some"-we are all materialistic even I- some irony here that your user name is ???? :-) Huggers I never said we should stop caring for our environment-I said this is an act of vandalism-as a result why not inform the police instead of a community warden who are sadly as useful as a chocolate radiator. Well done also to all the children around the world who were sponsored for Haiti-i didnt belittle their achievements or effoorts. Perhaps i was mistaken in thinking i would have got a better response on this forum-i wasnt expecting 100s of responses, but some discourse positive or negative would have been good. One can be concerned for Haiti one"s local area and daffodils-I just feel right now Haiti is more important.

Really really sorry if this has been answered already, am putting off serving up dinner to my starving family & getting a bit of grief so haven't read through whole thread. But have to ask whilst it's in my mind;


Is it considered OK to pick broken daffs? You know, the ones that have been knocked over by dogs or kids playing, or even a heavy rain shower? I sometimes do this on my early morning run, but always feel as if I'm doing something very bad. What's the form on this?


Thanks - need 'moral'guidance here!

  • 2 weeks later...

Have to agree with this too - usually Dulwich Park figures highly in this sort of ill-considered selfishness.


How is it that a substantial class of people who act as though the local roads and parks are their personal domain seem to have colonised our area??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
    • My view is that any party that welcomes a self-declared Marxist would merit a negative point. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...