Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Zebedee Tring Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People whose inflection rises as they reach the

> end of a sentence - apart from Australians of

> course who are allowed to. I think that it was

> watching "Neighbours" that caused people who were

> kids at the time to talk this way.


I hate that too. I consider it an American thing.

Whooop I KNOW THIS ONE its a Forum Favourite Yehah!


Zebedee Tring Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People at rock gigs who woop loudly during before,

> after or during songs, or who applaud wildly when

> they recognise what song the singer/band is

> singing/playing

yeah bloody tom Ive gone from spare to heir. Oh no gran leaving me all that money in the will is fine its just the rest. Poor little rich git.


Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Archers again... Tom and Kirsty's wedding was

> the final straw. Sorry, Archers, it's over: I've

> been faithful for twenty years but you've changed

> and I realise I don't love you any more.

I have to disagree re The Archers. Hearing Moany Tony at last telling Sausage Boy Tom in no uncertain terms what he thought of him and Kirsty giving Ms Entitlement Hellin an earful were two of the finest moments that I've heard in the programme for years.


If it had been in Stenders, on hearing of the jilting Roy would have said "I don't believe I'm 'earing this!" and Kirsty's dad would have tried to punch Tom, only for Kirsty to cry "Leave him Dad, 'e ain't worf it!"

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Snooker commentary... far too much of it..


Good test of a sport - turn the commentary down and see if it still exciting. Something I discovered while travelling - if you don't understand the commentators (and so have the volume turned lowish), many sports become rather boring.


Funnily enough, I think this makes no difference to snooker. Read into that what you may.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Snooker commentary... far too much of it..

>

> Good test of a sport - turn the commentary down

> and see if it still exciting. Something I

> discovered while travelling - if you don't

> understand the commentators (and so have the

> volume turned lowish), many sports become rather

> boring.

>

> Funnily enough, I think this makes no difference

> to snooker. Read into that what you may.


How do you turn down the commentary without losing all the other sound. ?


DulwichFox

Truckers caps and Baseball caps and especially the stupid, silly cunts who wear them. I blame George Michael and Princess Diana.


And another thing... people who like George Michael and Princess Diana.


Also, the deification of Princess Diana as some sort of Mother Teresa type figure. Just take out the first I in deification and you'll be nearer the mark.

That fecking irritating beyond belief advert on the BBC with those two irritating smug useless wankers James Corden and Gary Barlow for their up and coming programme when "When One Fat Smug Useless One Tricky Pony Tosser With A Neatly Trimmed Beard Met Another Fat Smug One Trick Pony Tosser With A Neatly Trimmed Beard."


FFS! It even has Barlow raising his right arm in a fascist salute. Cunts! It makes me want to hunt them down and kill them and stomp on their grotesque smarmy smug licking each other's arsehole faces for all eternity. Cunts!

Sad troll posters who post on threads in which they are not interested so that they can be gratuitously rude to other posters and try to wind them up. But they don't cause me irrational rage - I just feel very, very sorry for them because they don't have a life.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...