Jump to content

I confronted a thuggish dog fouler (Lounged)


poppylucky

Recommended Posts

Is that the same Mockney, as saying that bullies get picked on because they are self-fulfilling a need ? Absolute tosh I am afraid. Posters as in real life get picked on here and called trolls and imposters if a small group of long term forumites think they can get away with it, think its a laugh and think they are the only ones who have the right to an opinion. I have been told to go away and be quiet more than once on here. And now I am called hysterical for standing up for myself !
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok - being stupid here DD. You don't like the board, you don't like the cliqueness of the board and feel that you have been got at. I'm not asking you to go away, but I do wonder what on earth you are getting out of this?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mikecg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Your dead right, id rather not have posted it but

> I did.


Did you, Mike? I must have missed that event.


Madness, obviously, but I actually kind-of admire that. (Madness, though.. obviously)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite right DD, it's oppressive and I think you're the one to solve this!


You have extensive experience!


I notice that in your very first thread on the forum you managed to get your slagging in first against Matt at Casa, I presume in case he was likely to bully you?


I notice you managed to slag off Miles and his correspondents on your second thread, I presume also a case of getting one in first?


I notice you actually managed to fall out with a fictional social butterfly on the subject of free market economies in your next thread. An astounding victory against bullying.


I notice you chucked the fairplay rulebook away against a rather snobby architect a couple of threads later. I presume this was to demonstrate what bullying was in order to make sure other people could recognise it. A victory indeed.


I notice you also managed to pursue this vendetta across several unrelated threads - a sort of global bullying demonstration in case anyone missed your first example?


I'd say that you are undoubtedly the cleanest whistle in the pocket to draw attention to this bullying skulduggery!


;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voiced an opinion I did not gang up with anyone and most didnt agree with me anyway on most of the treads including this one. That doesnt warrant the sexual innuendo, intimadation and insults. Or does it ? And once again anyone who dissents is called an imposter or worst of all,,,,,,,,,,, Felicity .
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jah sweetie and Tillie Totter Why are you both reading this thread then if it is sooooo bothersome ? You could always go away you know. A radical post and likely to get me in all sorts of trouble for getting above my station but no one is actually making you read it are they ?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We were trying to contact Steve on 07990904375, following this post and yet there wasn't any reply from this number. Is it a correct number to contact Steve for decoration work?  
    • You might be 'amused' but obviously its something thats enough of a concern that there are specific rules in the entrance criteria to specifically disallow this, so not exactly comparative.  Aside from the flawed analysis, the idea of so much movement that there is a massive cost to the taxpayer of finding extra schooling is also unlikely.  As I noted upthread, the cost of private school education has increased dramatically in recent years.  Increases in fees over 10% per annum in some cases, so the idea that the application of VAT would drive the majority out just isn't the case.  There will be some who can't afford it any more. But then there are lots of people who couldn't afford it in the first place. Anyone who has accepted a school place in the last 2-3 years will have known this was Labour's policy, so their kids will be in year 9 by the time Labour gets in.  That would mean that only parents of those with children in years 10/11 likely to have been unaware when signing up.  They can obviously move their children for sixth form if needed.  The others shouldn't be surprised!  Those with children in juniors will need to take a view whether affordable or move to the state sector. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...