Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is that the same Mockney, as saying that bullies get picked on because they are self-fulfilling a need ? Absolute tosh I am afraid. Posters as in real life get picked on here and called trolls and imposters if a small group of long term forumites think they can get away with it, think its a laugh and think they are the only ones who have the right to an opinion. I have been told to go away and be quiet more than once on here. And now I am called hysterical for standing up for myself !

Mikecg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Your dead right, id rather not have posted it but

> I did.


Did you, Mike? I must have missed that event.


Madness, obviously, but I actually kind-of admire that. (Madness, though.. obviously)

Quite right DD, it's oppressive and I think you're the one to solve this!


You have extensive experience!


I notice that in your very first thread on the forum you managed to get your slagging in first against Matt at Casa, I presume in case he was likely to bully you?


I notice you managed to slag off Miles and his correspondents on your second thread, I presume also a case of getting one in first?


I notice you actually managed to fall out with a fictional social butterfly on the subject of free market economies in your next thread. An astounding victory against bullying.


I notice you chucked the fairplay rulebook away against a rather snobby architect a couple of threads later. I presume this was to demonstrate what bullying was in order to make sure other people could recognise it. A victory indeed.


I notice you also managed to pursue this vendetta across several unrelated threads - a sort of global bullying demonstration in case anyone missed your first example?


I'd say that you are undoubtedly the cleanest whistle in the pocket to draw attention to this bullying skulduggery!


;-)

I voiced an opinion I did not gang up with anyone and most didnt agree with me anyway on most of the treads including this one. That doesnt warrant the sexual innuendo, intimadation and insults. Or does it ? And once again anyone who dissents is called an imposter or worst of all,,,,,,,,,,, Felicity .
Jah sweetie and Tillie Totter Why are you both reading this thread then if it is sooooo bothersome ? You could always go away you know. A radical post and likely to get me in all sorts of trouble for getting above my station but no one is actually making you read it are they ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He wasn't great when interviewed on Channel 4 News this evening either, but he may get some respite tomorrow with the breaking Nandy story.
    • I was referring more to his performance at PMQs yesterday. It was quite a riot! Almost topped Mastermind  
    • Agreed, he should not be held accountable over the mess up over release of prisoners. On the other hand he did himself no favours with his gaffes on the BBC Master Mind programme where he passed on five questions. Where he did answer, here are some of his responses.... When asked who succeeded Henry VIII, Lammy incorrectly answered “Henry VII,” When asked which French scientist won Nobel prizes for both physics and chemistry?” Lammy responded with “Antoinette” When asked which fortress was built to defend Paris and later used as a prison, he answered “Versailles". When asked which variety of blue English cheese is often taken with port, he answered "Leicester" If nothing else he was entertaining.
    • Why do you think he should be toast? All these problems with the prison service apparently go way back, long before Labour took over.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...