Jump to content

I confronted a thuggish dog fouler (Lounged)

poppylucky

By poppylucky
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

dulwichdoll

dulwichdoll

Posted
Posted
Is that the same Mockney, as saying that bullies get picked on because they are self-fulfilling a need ? Absolute tosh I am afraid. Posters as in real life get picked on here and called trolls and imposters if a small group of long term forumites think they can get away with it, think its a laugh and think they are the only ones who have the right to an opinion. I have been told to go away and be quiet more than once on here. And now I am called hysterical for standing up for myself !
*Bob*

*Bob*

Posted
Posted

Mikecg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Your dead right, id rather not have posted it but

> I did.


Did you, Mike? I must have missed that event.


Madness, obviously, but I actually kind-of admire that. (Madness, though.. obviously)

Huguenot

Huguenot

Posted
Posted

Quite right DD, it's oppressive and I think you're the one to solve this!


You have extensive experience!


I notice that in your very first thread on the forum you managed to get your slagging in first against Matt at Casa, I presume in case he was likely to bully you?


I notice you managed to slag off Miles and his correspondents on your second thread, I presume also a case of getting one in first?


I notice you actually managed to fall out with a fictional social butterfly on the subject of free market economies in your next thread. An astounding victory against bullying.


I notice you chucked the fairplay rulebook away against a rather snobby architect a couple of threads later. I presume this was to demonstrate what bullying was in order to make sure other people could recognise it. A victory indeed.


I notice you also managed to pursue this vendetta across several unrelated threads - a sort of global bullying demonstration in case anyone missed your first example?


I'd say that you are undoubtedly the cleanest whistle in the pocket to draw attention to this bullying skulduggery!


;-)

dulwichdoll

dulwichdoll

Posted
Posted
I voiced an opinion I did not gang up with anyone and most didnt agree with me anyway on most of the treads including this one. That doesnt warrant the sexual innuendo, intimadation and insults. Or does it ? And once again anyone who dissents is called an imposter or worst of all,,,,,,,,,,, Felicity .
dulwichdoll

dulwichdoll

Posted
Posted
Jah sweetie and Tillie Totter Why are you both reading this thread then if it is sooooo bothersome ? You could always go away you know. A radical post and likely to get me in all sorts of trouble for getting above my station but no one is actually making you read it are they ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • HeadNun
      Cllr Williams to stand down

      By HeadNun · Posted

      I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • Sephiroth
      Cllr Williams to stand down

      By Sephiroth · Posted

      You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • HeadNun
      Cllr Williams to stand down

      By HeadNun · Posted

      I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • Rockets
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By Rockets · Posted

      To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...