Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Which of you has or still does have a crush on a celebrity who's name you'd rather not mention in public? I personally have always had a thing for Fiona Bruce as she reads the news or presents the Antiques road show with her seductive undertones. The woman looks positively life threatening in bed. Failing that I'd happily have a sex sandwich with Emily Maitlis and Sophie Raworth. I can just imagine the horsey squeals as I put my gut stick to good use.


I just seem to have a thing for BBC newsreaders.


Over to you.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5958-celebrity-crush/
Share on other sites

LE-ish, as a bun and cheese aficionado, your comment made me laugh out loud.


Though from what i've heard i'd probably have more chance with LL than you... *another thread for another time*



For me, one-on-one UK-wise at the moment, it's got to be Claudia Winkelman. i'd have to feed her up on some hard food though for about a month and a day. I've seen more meat on Hugh's Freedom Food. Humour and a way with words always did make me go stoopid at the knees.


As for threesomes, it'd have to be Eva Mendes and Halle Berry. I would happily die before, during and after i dropped my load.

Predictable one but noughties naughty property queen, Sarah Beeney still rings my bell. Curves, Frostrup-esque tones,kitchen advice and a nice pair of feet.


Might seem odd but I once spent ten mins chatting to Joss Stone at a party about old delta blues records before noticing she had quite wonky big toes. She kind of had vulture feet where the right one looked like an old mans thumb. Really put me off.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...