Jump to content

Recommended Posts

i'd love to catch a look, is there a regular flight to look out for? having lived under a flight path all my life this question is less stupid than it sounds. you used to be able to set your watch to concord...back in the days, whole playgrounds of kids shouting concord and pointing up to the sky.

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone else noticed how low flying planes have

> been in the last fortnight? Well under the 2000

> feet that MP claimed in his letter to Tessa

> Jowell.


They're not lower. It's one of those "the big things are closer, the others are far away" scenarios.

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I flew back from Singapore on an A380 last week.

>

> No different to a 747 when you're sitting inside,

> tbh.

>

> Except the inflight entertainment system kept

> crashing. It was a very long flight.



came back from Cambodia via S'pore last week also. Pore is a dreadful place.


It was me who sat behind you, kicking the back of your seat and crying BTW

Any place has got good and bad bits. Singapore's worst places are Boat Quay and Clarke Quay - the purpose built tourist venues by the business district.


Evens so, they're only as bad as Canary Wharf and those naff little buffed-up warehouses round there.


London's dreadful if you spend the night in a Wetherspoon. etc. etc.

I liked S'pore when I was there but I was a young naval officer celebrating my 21st birthday in Boogie Street - playing tic tac toe with youngster for a singaporean $, drinking Tiger beer, eating from roadside stalls and being entertained by some very friendly QUANTAS airhostesses and avoiding the ladyboys. I thought it was fantastic - but I'm sure its now sanitised and tidy state would be less exotic.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Considering the private revision study that my children undertook, perhaps 15 to 20 years ago in that library it seems a shame they have timed the refurbishment so it won't be open at this crucial time for children. But hey, so long as it's greener... 
    • Enforcement costs money which I doubt the fines actually pay for. Presumably it hasn't been a priority. 
    • Details here: https://www.southwark.gov.uk/2025/dulwich-library-closing-refurbishment
    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...