Jump to content

Recommended Posts

After much lubricated discussion the following is proposed:


EDF drinkies on the FIRST FRIDAY OF EVERY MONTH - that ensures that the salaried will have been paid in the previous 7 days.


Venues to rotate - happy to accept offers and inducements from local hostelries that will attract 20 plus civilised heavy drinkers to your establishments with the resulting follow on business and positive public discussion :)-D


Georgia and I are happy to coordinate - within reason.


Thoughts?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/653-the-future-of-the-edf-drinkie/
Share on other sites

Yup. The idea was for an introductory message to new members about the forum and its doings:


Brief history

Purpose of the various areas

Culture i.e. we are nice to each other even in disagreement

The traditional greeting and response

The EDF Drinkie

Stuff

hello - I've recently stumbled upon the EDF - what a great idea.


I'd love to come along and meet everyone and to try a new pub - I've been in east dulwich for a couple of years now and have never heard of the gowlett! i get paid on the last working day of the month and, after mortgage, should just about have enough for a night on the beers on the 1st.....:)-D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Or increase tax.  The freezing of personal allowances is one way, not what I would choose.  On principle I don't care if the rich immigrate.  The main parties could have been more honest before the election.  Reform is deluded.
    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...