Jump to content

new bar 'BOHO' serving sushi

Walker

By Walker
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Starmix

Starmix

Posted
Posted

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Japanese sushi and sashimi recipes are the easiest

> popular cuisine to prepare at home, IMHO.

> Especially worthwhile today, when one can spend

> upwards of ?100 a head at a 'cult' bar/restaurant

> for the same pleasure. It takes a little practice

> but it's very forgiving - just take it apart and

> try again.

>

> All the necessary ingredients are available from

> various local speciality stores (e.g. there's one

> in Peckham and another in Camberwell) and there

> are literally hundreds of online guides, FAQs and

> how-to websites.

>

> A couple of examples:

> www.sushifaq.com

> SushiAtHome.pdf



THIS.


The only thing I'd add to it is PROTIP: Get fresh fish. And I'm not talking 3 day old fish that's been sat on a fishmarket, I'm talking so fresh that you can still taste the saltwater. Zushi isn't as complicated as you'd think, the SUPER SECRET METHOD is to ensure that you don't overcook the rice, that can be the dealbreaker between a dish that is OM NOM NOM to a dish that is MEH. Get some nice rice wine vinegar and you're pretty much set to go.

Zushi is better than Sashimi IMO, because you can cook whatever fish you're using without offending the Japanese Gods. If you're dead set on eating raw and you're all about Sashimi, I'd say go Hotate-gai, it's like eating fishy steak.

char1ie

char1ie

Posted
Posted

I thought Boho bar was crap when I went for a couple of drinks recently. No door policy, random punters, pointless screen, not good. Shame because if it was more discerning as to who it let in, and a few details were adjusted I'm sure it could be a fine little place.


Charlie

Jah Lush

Jah Lush

Posted
Posted
Popped in for 20 minutes or so early last Friday evening and had what was supposed to be a Mai Tai. Dreadful. Absolutely nothing like one and it came in the smallest glass imaginable. It's supposed to have three different rums in for feck's sake. Half empty and a dull ambience. Must try much much harder.
Sue

Sue

Posted
Posted

char1ie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Shame because

> if it was more discerning as to who it let in, and

> a few details were adjusted I'm sure it could be a

> fine little place.

>

> Charlie


xxxxxxx


So who had it let in (apart from you of course) and why do you think they didn't deserve to be there?


Who do you think should be let in, and why?


:-S

Jeremy

Jeremy

Posted
Posted

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So who had it let in (apart from you of course)

> and why do you think they didn't deserve to be

> there?

>

> Who do you think should be let in, and why?


This is exactly what I was wondering. I have absolutely zero interest in drinking in a bar with a "discerning door policy". In fact if you're so picky about who you drink with, why bother leaving the house at all?

char1ie

char1ie

Posted
Posted

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "more discerning as to who it let in"?

>

> ::o


They let me in with my depressed divoercee friend (bad choice), they let in a group of 6 pissed up large argumentative geezers (bad choice), they let in some very bored looking old men (bad choice) and the 12 or so trendy good looking young girls and boys that wandered in wandered straight out again because of the low quality punters that were in there.


Charlie

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

char1ie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jeremy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > "more discerning as to who it let in"?

> >

> > ::o

>

> They let me in with my depressed divoercee friend

> (bad choice), they let in a group of 6 pissed up

> large argumentative geezers (bad choice), they let

> in some very bored looking old men (bad choice)

> and the 12 or so trendy good looking young girls

> and boys that wandered in wandered straight out

> again because of the low quality punters that were

> in there.

>

> Charlie




So basically they let everybody in.

Sue

Sue

Posted
Posted

char1ie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

the 12 or so trendy good looking young girls

> and boys that wandered in wandered straight out

> again because of the low quality punters that were

> in there.

>

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


So you think they should only let in "high quality punters", which by your definition appear to be:


Trendy

Good looking

Young


??????


Have I understood you correctly?


Do you think they should have some kind of "good looks detector" on the door, and maybe ask everybody for proof of age in case they're over - what? 25???


Oh, and vet their clothes in case they've strayed off trend?


FFS :-S

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Insuflo
      We R Blighty Scam on Lordship Lane

      By Insuflo · Posted

      There was good item on Radio 4’s consumer affairs programme You &Yours on 1st December. It was about these CIC fund raising scams and refers to this We R Blighty mob in particular (they have been successfully prosecuted twice and fined for their activities in the City of London). Also mentioned the “knife crime charity” lot who also show up in ED. The advice was to give them nothing and that they are breaking the law. It’s on the BBC Sounds app or via this link  (the item starts at 41m51s in): https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002n065      I think you know perfectly well that is not what the poster is saying. There are a lot of CICs (there are now 37,000 of them) that have been set up specifically to mislead the public into handing over money. This We R Blighty is one such. These are the details of one of the cases against them in the City last month: https://news.cityoflondon.gov.uk/we-r-blighty-told-to-pay-out-thousands-over-illegal-collections/
    • alice
      We R Blighty Scam on Lordship Lane

      By alice · Posted

      Are you saying all CICs are dodgy? I think that’s totally unfair.
    • Moonglum
      We R Blighty Scam on Lordship Lane

      By Moonglum · Posted

      Similar deal to those Hive City guys who also camp outside of M&S, also a dodgy CIC rather than a charity 
    • Angelina
      Please be careful of border collie off lead in Peckham Rye

      By Angelina · Posted

      please report this to the police - were there any witnesses? She should face charges. the owner should not allow dogs off lead - I'm so sorry this has happened.  It would be good if you can identify her - are there cameras - in the cafes around? - follow her, find her address and report her. https://www.met.police.uk/advice/advice-and-information/ac/animal-crime/ also report to the park wardens so they can be found Your Local Council: Contact them to report issues in parks or public areas, especially if you know the dog or owner, as they investigate under local bylaws and the Dangerous Dogs Act. https://www.gov.uk/control-dog-public/report-a-dog

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...