Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Not as much as you might think.....I play pretty small stakes (I think MM is a bit bigger than me)


Culturally, my whole family do it. I love sport and it gives an added edge to any sporting event.


Workwise - I worked for a big internet gambling company so know a bit


Mathematically I enjoy simple probability and am quite analytical so like looking for patterns, data and finding 'value' as we'd say


More recently, technology has meant that you can get much more fun for your buck, get reward points and bonuses and play around on something like Betfair with systems etc without risking much. I have taken out my initial amount I put in Betfair in 2006 and never put anything back in so I'm playing for free. It's a sort of geeks paradise as some geeks know!


I love poker too and play a lot online.


For me it's a true hobby that last year neted out at costing me about ?100 for hours of fun. One big night out.


I never play roulette, the lottery or fruits - the probability soesn't work that's just giving money away

Funny how you come at that question from a negative perspective BBW.


?200 is the most I have lost on a single bet (Celtic).


I agree with all thats Quids said, so no point in me writing my own summary.


I keep a complete record and for the last year (from August 2008) I am up ?1,300 but that was ?2,200 at one point as I'm ?900 down over the last few months. Most bets would be ?10,?20 or ?50. I'm currently betting smallish until I get a win as I am beginning to feel the recent negative cashflow.


It definately adds a lot of interest to sporting occaisions that I might not normally care much about, so provided you bet within your means its good fun.

Forgive me for approaching the subject from a touchy angle Mick Mac. I sometimes gamble but mainly on football matches to add some 'juice' to the proceedings. I don't trust online gambling as it seems like it would be very easy to manipulate in the bookies favour. My grandfather was a big gambler and had two very substantial wins from horse racing syndicates.

bbw Betfairs an exchange not a bookies

Ditto poker sites, they make a fortune out of rake not by beating YOU, you play other punters..people just don't understand that ot poker

How can a bookie online manipulate against you? You get a price you like you take it or not?


I'm not trying to encourage gambling in anyway as I think we all have enough vices but the sort of things the general public (and you in this case) say about online gambling is about as sensible and based in fact as what they say about illegal drugs for instance! It's prejudiced horsehit!


You'll probably lose like most people if you take it up though so stick to something else!

Oh don't get me wrong Quids as I'm sure that the big players in online gambling are quite fiercely regulated but some slip through the net. I was mainly talking about the roulette websites as for all I know some bloke in Indonesia could simply be choosing the outcome for his own gain.


I confess that I know very little about gambling online or face to face, I don't even know how to play Poker!

Sorry, to add to MM's point about keeping in your means, if I lose everything I've got in all my accounts this afternoon It won't affect my finances, family or me in any material way whatsoever - and on paper I've for sure beaten my 'professional' advisers who invest my pension over the last year!


Impressed with your returns MM!


And to show the ridiculousness of it all. One of my biggest ever win was Matt from Busted(?) who was up for eviction from I'm a celebrity and my 11 year old nephew said "He'll never go everyone round all the ;local schools is texting eachother to vote for him" I put a lump on him at 62/1..that's called having an edge on the markets in punters terms :)


I put a ?10 on Betfair

I'm going to oppose Sea the Stars in the Eclipse today and back Rip van Winkle @ 7.6 on Betfair - its a long shot and this horse has not produced at Group 1 level as yet but OBrien camp rate it very highly so today may be its day. Sea the Stars is probably the horse we should back but at 1.63 the odds are just far too short to be worth a bet. Its very rare for any horse to keep winning Group 1s, no matter how good it is.


Quids - I usually think its best to back on golf after 2 rounds to see who's in the mix. McDowell is out of it so have backed Westwood at 10/1 this morning. But Green looks in very good position. Whats odds did you get?

I've also had ?2 on Darren Clarke at 500/1 as he has just moved to -3. Those are good odds.

I got 35, he's 13 this morning so I've laid it and now have a free bet (albeit with reduced profit).


It's Sea the Stars best distance and he's a fantastic horse but I agree about the odds...you could Lay him if you really think that, it'll be a low exposure at those odds. I'm just going to observe this one.

tommy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I wonder what the odds of Michael Owen signing for

> Manure were at the start of the week...


They were 20/1 on Thursday morning - and 4/9 by the evening


After yesterday anything is possible so might be worth a punt on Tevez to join Liverpool - 33/1 on SkyBet

Save your money boys, Tevez going to Citeh is a done deal...


I only bet on sports that I'm interested in and like to think I have a bit of knowledge on, never really got into the BetFair culture of in-play betting, so I'm keeping it Old Skool with a big wedge going on Sea the Stars today, had Roddick to beat Murray and will re-invest on Fed to win in straight sets tomorrow, the guy is on another level...

Some Michael Owen related odds...


Hills, who make Owen a 10-1 chance to be Premier League top scorer, reckon he will be only a bit-part player for United, presumably because his parts are in bits. He's 20-1 to start more than 25 Premier League games for United and maybe that's not a bad bet because he'll have Dimitar Berbatov to do all his running for him.


It's just 11-2 that he starts fewer than six.


He's 6-4 with Paddy Power to be handed the illustrious No.7 shirt and a very tasty 10-1 to be out injured for United's curtain-raiser against Birmingham next month.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...