Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was cycling home from work this afternoon, trying to get back in time to make the most of the sunshine and have a few ice cold tinnies in the Dulwich library garden.


As I turned right from Village Way into Dulwich Village, the traffic looked a bit sluggish and potentially dangerous for my liking so I hopped onto the pavement and bombed past the jam, skillfully weaving in and out of the Alleyns pupils as they trundled along at a snails pace. B)


When I got to the parade of shops I cut across the pedestrian crossing, intending to zip past th Crown and Greyound and bomb through the park, only to be SHOUTED at by some jumped-up yummy with an oversized pram "Watch where you're fu**ing going! It's a crossing not a bloody bike path!"


I skidded to a halt, almost stacking in the process but was so shocked by the unnecessary use of foul language I was unable to think on my feet (as it were) and come back with a witty and suitably cutting response.


Anyway, just a warning to any other cyclists thinking of taking this super-useful shortcut. Watch out for this psycho yummy mummy and her guttermouth! (No doubt she drives a 4x4 to Sainsburys at Le Weekend)(6)

Hey Horse, you got off lightly, mate; I was weaving in and out of the traffic on Lordship Lane today, trying to, like you, gain a few seconds in my quest for a few cans on the sun lounger, I burst through the pedestrian crossing by Iceland when it was on red, brushing the sholley of a surly OAP, before hanging a crafty right into North Cross, cutting across the path of a Taxi and virtually fleecing a couple of uber-mums with twin-prams in the process. Just as I was giving myself a smug pat on the back for my deft work, someone called after me that they would "see me next Tuesday"....

I'm afraid not, Kel. There are some bloody rude people on the streets. The more I think about it the angrier I get.


What kind of example is this woman setting to the school kids? Some of them looked about school leaving age - if they use such language in front of prospective employers or college admissions deans, I can only pray for their futures.


CitizenED - glad you emerged relatively unscathed (other than an ear bashing!). Clipping anyone or anything at speed can occasionally result in a tumble onto the tarmac. OAPs seem to be somewhat denser than their slight frames would have you believe and in the past I have had some unexpectedly nasty falls as a result of the most minor collisions.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I tried this line of satire before - then quids

> gave his harsh but fair rating and I never

> bothered again



Never mind Sean - your new "undercover" roles as PROSouthwark and Gallinello is coming along nicely. Only someone with a finely honed sense of irony and knowledge of left wing lunacies could crate such characters.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I wish to "get a rewind" and go back to

> Annasfield's post.

>

> What is that guy standing on? Is that a kind of

> canoe, which converts into a stationary

> "mini-island"?


I don't know. It looks pretty cool though.

Strawbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I hate to state the obvious but what about the

> fact it was a pedestrian crossing?


What's your point, caller?

If I'd cut into the road suddenly I ran the risk of encountering the slow, dangerous traffic. I did a quick risk assesment

And chose the safest, quickest option.

Did you manage to get her number plate or can you give us a more detailed description of car driver with the vexed expression.


I may be able to get places quicker than other road users, but I may have to stop riding, until something is done about crazy car/ lorry drivers.

Horsebox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Strawbs Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I hate to state the obvious but what about the

> > fact it was a pedestrian crossing?

>

> What's your point, caller?

> If I'd cut into the road suddenly I ran the risk

> of encountering the slow, dangerous traffic. I did

> a quick risk assesment

> And chose the safest, quickest option.


I guess Im just trying to work out whether she yelled at you because you went across a pedestrian crossing whilst she was on it with her child?

Horsebox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> As I turned right from Village Way into Dulwich

> Village, the traffic looked a bit sluggish and

> potentially dangerous for my liking so I hopped

> onto the pavement and bombed past the jam,

> skillfully weaving in and out of the Alleyns

> pupils as they trundled along at a snails pace.


The fact that you say you use the pavement to cycle on regularly means you got what you deserved, cyclists are supposed to use the road, not pavements which are meant for pedestrians. I can't see you've got any reason to complain. Whenever I see a cyclist riding a bike behind me on the pavement I make a pont of walking as slowly as possible and in the middle of the pavement so that the cycle riding idiot can't pass, or if he/she rings a bell or coughs to bring my attention to their presence I either ignore them or give them a few friendly words of advice, depending on how how grumpy I am at the time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...