Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What that intersection could use is one of these.

>

>

> http://www.freefoto.com/images/9906/09/9906_09_31-

> --4-way-stop-sign_web.jpg?&amp%3Bk=4+way+stop+sign


You're bang on the money Brendan. Being forced to make a complete stop would make a huge difference.

A four-way stop system works much like a roundabout (right of way) except that you HAVE to stop. In Canada I've had a pretty good fine for coming to only a rolling stop rather than a full stop. They're taken quite seriously and the fines are severe for not stopping. A fine adds points to your driver's license, which makes renewal very expensive and car insurance can become incredibly expensive. I think most people realize that it's just too expensive to be a terrible driver there. It would be perfect for that spot.

Hi,


All emergency vehicles have a wider axle than that of the normal car, thus humps will not affect ambulances or fire engines (except bog standard police cars). Local councils are reluctant to install humps unless there have been a noticeable increase in accidents as they can be sued for causing damage to the car.

I guess the problem is with the driver of private car's.

It is quite simple.... Take it easy, exit side roads with due care, wait at the pedestrian crossing until the lights give you the authority to move (both for driver's and pedestrians) and when you are at traffic lights or crossings stop closer to the pavement so that the Lycra Boy's do not undertake you and cause problems for other road user's.


I think that the more signs or other forms of slowing traffic down distract driver's and has the opposite effect.

Oh well, gotta go now as this thread is boring me.

Kind regards,

Libra Carr.

quick solution = average speed camera.


Those that don't drive much in London will realise how much damage speed bumbs do to a car. As a scooter rider I also realise that raod is the most dangerous in South London. Mostly due to undesirables speeding, I once asked a guy to slow down, you can imagine what his response was!

I'd be more happy with speed cameras than road humps as I'm not a speeder but hate the humps and will go miles out of my way to avoid them ,my ex small car just couldnt navigate them well and almost had to come to a stop when going over them,much to the annoyance of cars behind me and risking one ploughing into me.

espelli Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I didn't see the exact date (as I was driving at the time!) But it was

> either Saturday or Sunday at 12 something. Sorry I can't be more helpful.


No, that's fine, thanks. I'd been wondering what motivated it. In my belief, the police don't usually bother with such things unless they feel there's a strong need. I remember, for example, as a commuter, seeing such a notice turn up on Waterloo Bridge a month or so after an accident, and wondering what had happened (perhaps someone died?) to merit its appearance then.


For whatever reason, it's probably a good thing that the police are getting involved in the analysis process. All accident statistics are collected and can be collated (there are web pages available, for example, showing the locations of all accidents involving cyclist). So perhaps the question of Barry Road is reaching the desk of the appropriate managers in both the police and the council. Contacting local councillors or police liaison would be a good way of helping nudge any such process along.

Having done a speed awareness course this morning I discovered that cameras are usually only put up if there's 3 serious accidents within a 3 year period. There are about 600 cameras around London and you can find out the details of each one here http://lscp.org.uk.


It tells you why cameras are there and it's not to make money (although it was before 2002), it's a reactive response to accident blackspots. For example the speed camera that's on Peckham Rye (near the new school) is there because in the 36 months before it appeared:

Fatal collisions : 1 Number of Fatal collisions at this site.

Serious collisions : 4 Number of Serious collisions at this site.

Slight collisions : 17 Number of Slight collisions at this site.

KSI : 5 Killed or seriously injured

http://lscp.org.uk/?cameras&cameraID=119


So as Barry road seems to having a fair few accidents I would second Ianr's comment about contacting the local councillors and/or police liaison and chivvying them along if you want a camera on that road.


[edited once]

I don't know if he was a biker but he looked like a silver haired Nick Griffin with a beer belly. Anyway without taking this too much off topic it was an interesting course and it does explain further the difference in stopping distances between driving at 30, 32, 35 and 40 which was an eye opener.


He did also say that if there's enough call from local residents the police may set up random speed checks from the back of an incognito van to periodically catch speeders in an area.

Of course stopping distances are entirely variable according to what car you own. A new Mercedes with ceramic discs will stop in a fraction of the distance of some clapped out banger that scraped through it's MOT when both are travelling at the same speed. The speed limit is the same for everyone however. And this is correct; an interesting anomoly nonetheless.


I'm aesthically opposed to further street furniture, such as extra signs, bollards, flashing lights, road markings etc and decent research suggests that the removal of these "driver aids" can in fact lower the number of incidents.


But given the clamour of opinion in this case, a mini roundabout would seem a sensible solution.

espelli Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is a yellow "Traffic Incident" board there

> now which may serve as a useful visual cue to slow

> down/look around etc.



But where they have chained it to a lamp post makes it even more difficult to see whats coming from the right up Barry Rd if you are trying to pull out from Underhill.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Of course stopping distances are entirely variable

> according to what car you own.


The examples we were shown were police serviced vehicles with Class 1 police drivers and they took about 30 feet to stop at 30MPH plus thinking time, so about 45feet.

Roughly speaking, if someone walks out from behind a 33ft long bus, at 30MPH you're going to hit them, but it'll be at 6MPH. At 40 MPH you're going to hit them at 18MPH which will hurt them a lot more. And that's with a well looked after car.


(Blimey, do I sound like I've been brainwashed?)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The coop of Forest Hill Road is very different- cheerful and helpful staff 
    • Would you expose your young people to 'that man'? That is apparently a real question. 'That man' is in fact a retired Oxford Professor of Moral & Pastoral Theology who wrote a book setting out to provide a moral reckoning on the vexed subject of Britain's Empire and its history. What might formerly have been a purely academic matter has become highly contentious, and according to one Cambridge academic "serious shit" that needed to be CLOSED DOWN. It's all rather amazing, the stuff of satire or nightmare but not of the real world. Anyway, Lord Biggar accepted an invitation to visit Peckham and speak to and with a small audience that was due to include young Black students ... who in the end didn't come on the day! Having set the whole thing up to facilitate this encounter for them, the outcome was a disappointment. The conversation with Lord Biggar and audience was not:   
    • Entertaining a visitor from Philippines, she's been here before but I've promised lunch.  Somewhere a little different maybe, quirky?
    • Surely a very simple: "how much does the council receive from the organisers of the Gala festival for payment for use of Peckham Rye" would smoke out a response. The "commercial sensitivity" could be because the council are giving it away or it could be because Gala don't want others to know how much they are paying - it is really tough to make money from any type of festival these days and Wide Awake in Brockwell, for example, sent out a plea for people to buy tickets via a reduced price "Tell a Friend" special offer because (they said much of it linked to the problems Lambeth were having with the High Court) things were entering "squeaky bum time"  and they were struggling to hit their break-even point. It does make me wonder whether expansion is baked-in to the agreements the council has with the organisers for events like Gala as the organisers have to be able to scale the size of the event each year to try to make money. I do also how much of the "revenue" from these events might be swallowed up by the provision of the "free community" event element of them. The comment piece in the Guardian sums it up quite nicely: The heart of this issue seems to be how cash-strapped councils are becoming increasingly beholden to commercial interests to the detriment of the public. A weekend festival that welcomes 50,000 people can expect to raise about £500,000 for local authorities. Councils argue that this money goes back in the public purse, allowing them to continue funding free community events such as Lambeth’s beloved Country Show, though there doesn’t seem to be much transparency over exactly how much cash is raised or where it is allocated.   The issue for councils may well be that if people found out how much was actually being raised by these events that the community would say the disruption is not worth it and I do wonder how much of the revenue is being swallowed up by the provision of the "free event" using the same infrastructure. Any time a council doesn't want to share something openly very much suggests that it is because they think constituents won't like the answer.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...