Jump to content

No through route at Loughborough Junction


mikeb

Recommended Posts

We received a penalty charge notice at the weekend after having unknowingly driven through the 'pedestrian' zone on 29th August. Amount to pay was zero. We haven't driven that way since but I pity anyone who regularly commutes that way. A warning period of three weeks doesn't count for much when the warnings take 4 weeks to come through.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

davidk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good news. There have already been some trial

> closures that worked well. Really no good reason

> that there should be traffic along there.

>

> Should hopefully open up another safe corridor for

> cycling into the City from South and South East.



I'm surprised by this statement. It's a road and that's enough reason for traffic to go along there. People want to get from A to B....


Unfortunately ED has dreadful transport links which are not going to improve anytime soon (or ever). The useless Southern Railway from ED via peckham to london bridge has ghost trains which disappear from the screen when they are due to arrive and the service mostly unreliable. It takes 1 hour to get into Victoria by bus from ED (the Plough) and you can spend all day getting down walworth road on a bus to Elephant & Castle!


Before this recent road closure and the oval cycle highway works, it would take me 20 minutes or possibly 30 during rush hour to get to Victoria. Cycling isn't always practical for some of us (although hopefully improvements are making it safer)


Wish TFL would take over Southern railway franchise to bring London overground to ED.


I'm disappointed that they have closed off such a large section of Loughborough junction and Myatts Fields to traffic without providing some information on alternative routes. It's chaos now; people keep turning in the road. I'm sure there will be an accident soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone actually found a half reliable driving route to and from Vauxhall since this closure? Thought I was onto a winner yesterday, left from Akerman into Lilford towards Coldharbour only to find Lilford closed to cars towards the end! Everyone was ignoring the sign, so I did too but would prefer not to take that risk every day....
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Before this recent road closure and the oval cycle highway works, it would take me 20 minutes or possibly 30 during rush hour to get to Victoria. Cycling isn't always practical for some of us (although hopefully improvements are making it safer)



This is why they need to focus more on *local* cycle links (and cycle parking at stations) rather than long distance. In to London and back is a lot to ask of some people - but from ED you've got masses of good stations within a couple of miles - too far to walk, but an easy, relaxed cycle. West Dulwich & Herne Hill for fast trains to Victoria; Tulse Hill & Herne Hill for City and Wimbledon; ED itself for London Bridge; Peckham Rye & Honor Oak for the East End, Docklands & Croydon; Brixton for the Tube. All reachable in 20 minutes on a bike taking it very easy -- wearing normal clothes, not breaking a sweat, lugging a pannier bag or two of work stuff, stopping for red lights etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What on earth makes you think that?


Never mind that many of those same people also can't drive, for the same reasons.


There are all manner of lightweight, electric-assisted vehicles which can use most cycle facilities - and which can still be used by people whose eyesight, reaction time etc. rules driving out. Albeit there's a lot of room for improvement in terms of how accessible public transport is for people who use them - and the same, or worse, issues around secure parking at stations as cyclists face.


I do know one local cyclist who's still riding at the grand old age of 89 - age, in itself, is no obstacle. And another who rides miles on his Brompton - despite having one of his legs amputated above the knee. And there's this inspiring lady:




Besides - would your accusation not be better leveled at those able bodied folk who could reasonably use alternatives, but routinely drive short distances regardless? Causing pointless congestion and delays to those who genuinely have no choice.


A little light reading:


https://aseasyasridingabike.wordpress.com/2014/04/22/independent-mobility/


https://bicycledutch.wordpress.com/2012/12/06/who-else-benefits-from-the-dutch-cycling-infrastructure/


Two miles is really not a lot. Same as walking half, three quarters of a mile. Not everyone can manage that, true, but the vast majority can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



"Grand old age of 89". How patronising can you get?




What about the people who can't manage it?


I'm not defending the people who drive for short distances. My comments were directed at cyclists who seem to be saying that everyone should cycle regardless. This is a bit like the attitude of the Southwark Council ruling party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed.... driving is not the best solution, parking is limited and restricted to 4 hours and it isn't that flexible.


What would also be ideal is to have a cycle hire scheme locally which provides flexibility and the options to use all the local stations. Demand would be high ...


Anyway for now we have no hope for any public transport improvements

Link to comment
Share on other sites


What about the people who can't manage it?


I'm not defending the people who drive for short distances. My comments were directed at cyclists who seem to be saying that everyone should cycle regardless.



I saw a straw man try to cycle once. His foot got caught up in the derailleur and.. the rest doesn't bear thinking about :o)



This is a bit like the attitude of the Southwark Council ruling party.



Perhaps - although in any case this particular (& so far rather messy) scheme is a Lambeth initiative.


Was over there this morning - still enough traffic either confused or ignoring the CCTV that it's not remotely functioning as a Pedestrian Zone. On the plus side, the air along Loughborough Rd itself felt a lot cleaner than usual - although Coldharbour Lane & Camberwell New Road may have been worse, mind you.


One disappointment - was hoping it'd make Milkwood Road a bit quieter, that being the southern leg of the same route, no such luck there. Busy as ever.


If this scheme really is about getting more people to cycle, they need to get some cycle exemptions in to the crazy one way system north of Myatts Fields asap. Getting between there & Burgess Park is remarkably fiddly. Lothian Road / Akerman Road is plenty wide enough for a contra flow bike lane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read earlier that we've reached a stage with global warming of a 5m predicted ocean rise. We must all change our habits severely to try and mitigate this and from making it worse.

I'm trying to be a near vegetarian, cycling most commutes, 100% renewable electricity. I still need to do much more to reach 90% reduction in CO2 produced to sustain my lifestyle.


Closing this road hasn't been with great consultation, isn't well signed to warn people, probably shouldn't apply to residents.

But the principle of helping people change lifestyles is good. We just need much better execution of such ideas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a huge tailback all the way from Oval to Camberwell Green and up Denmark Hill yesterday. I really think that those ivolved in making the mess should have worked on Sundays and also suspended the bus-only route this weekend. It was bad to see hundreds of vehicles puthering out smoke and noxious particles, knowing that some of them would have been sent on this route because of the blocking off of Loughborough Junction.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lambeth Road SCheme Risking Lives - see attached

Evening Standard p24 Monday 5th Oct


Calls for a dangerous new road scheme to be scrapped were mounting today as the London Ambulance Service claimed the congestion it causes was putting patients at risk.....

In a written statement to the meeting MP Kate Hoey has written to Lambeth demanding closure of the sceme by 5pm today.


etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kate Hoey ‏@KateHoeyMP Oct 1

Inundated with e mails re closure of Wandsworth road north bound for 5 weeks @LambethSE @TfLTrafficNews Developers first residents last Why?

7 retweets 8 favorites

Reply Retweet 7 Favorite 8

More


Also much resent at:

##http://www.brixtonbuzz.com/2015/09/coldharbour-lane-gridlock-as-the-loughborough-junction-closure-experiment-goes-pear-shaped/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those minutes are laughable and I cannot believe that George Wright really said:


"GW said emergency services have been told about the road closures and if they need to access road they will need to pull out the road blocks." Someone needs to send that to the Evening Standard as a follow-up to their article last night....


So if you're having a heart-attack the ambulance will be with you after they have moved the temporary road blocks....honestly....


And not sure who suggested the following but really....


? Should close Herne Hill Road, Hinton Road and/or Milkwood Road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What / who do you consider a resident James?


One of the major problems of this sort of 'localism' in London is that with boroughs so close together, decisions made supposedly for the benefit of one groups of residents can have serious consequences on residents of another borough who get no say in the matter.


Even if Lambeth really believe it is appropriate, setting this up when there are major roadworks at Oval, Vauxhall and Elephant, not to mention significant public transport problems on national rail thanks to the London Bridge / Thameslink works, smacks of gross incompetence at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lozc Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What / who do you consider a resident James?

>

> One of the major problems of this sort of

> 'localism' in London is that with boroughs so

> close together, decisions made supposedly for the

> benefit of one groups of residents can have

> serious consequences on residents of another

> borough who get no say in the matter.

>

> Even if Lambeth really believe it is appropriate,

> setting this up when there are major roadworks at

> Oval, Vauxhall and Elephant, not to mention

> significant public transport problems on national

> rail thanks to the London Bridge / Thameslink

> works, smacks of gross incompetence at best.


Exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh Heck, wish I'd read this before I went out last night. Due to huge confusion with signs and no advance warning until it was too late to stop I stupidly must have gone though here last night - it was just so unclear what was what, with some signs painted over and blocks pulled to one side I thought it was something that was over, until I read the signs above me as I drove under them...suspect I'll just have to wait for some fine then!

There is no warning that the road is closed, no "no right turn" at Loughborough, no closed road ahead or similar coming along from the other end of the road that would warn you - it's completely confusing.

Bah!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • LTNs were pushed by the Conservative government (as was ULEZ which you also disapprove of). They were one of several active travel measures which were a condition of the TFL funding settlement post Covid.  £69m of direct borough funding (per year) was also provided to support more localised investment in walking and cycling schemes across the city and to accelerate the roll-out of LTNs…but we all know that Johnson and schnapps are secret commies 🤣 I’ve no idea. I do know that people are covering their plates and driving through, and that’s probably an accident waiting to happen (although clearly down to signage 🤣). The emergency services have agreed the changes, so I would assume that on balance they think it’s the right move. Whilst ‘One’ are suggesting the emergency services have agreed the changes under pressure, they wont say what sort of pressure, or who it’s coming from 🤔. Perhaps it’s the commies again 🤣😂
    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...