Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Look, all I'm trying to say is that I've recently used foxtons, and that I'd like to post about it. I'm very much aware that there's been previous threads on this issue, but I have no interest in revisiting them. I've used this estate agents recently and just wanted to post my experience, inky own thread. Not looking to flame, not looking to irritate, just want to post my thoughts, but I feel I can't as I'll be told by all and Sunday that this has been discused before, use the search engine, and start a slagging match that I'll never respond to. But damn your etiquette, why shouldn't I be able to post what I want, and why can't those that have seen it all before just leave it. Why? :(
i understand, lol. Another ex was sectioned. He went for a medical examination regarding returning to work, he told the doctor, someone tells me to pick the shovel up, another voice tells me to put the shovel down, i dont know who to listen to. The doctor threw his pen down and signed him off indefinately, so he said

I would even without seeing her



Is her name Mrs MRS MILF



Can I phone and ask ?




"Hello can I speak to missus MILF"


"No there is no missus MILF"


"Oh L I A R...... get your 88888888888 out

"Sorry I am calling the police"



"This is the police, I've got a ======= --------"


"Oh..................don't know what to say....do you have a house to sell or are you chain free"


"Sh*t"



ok in hind sight!

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Look, all I'm trying to say is that I've recently

> used foxtons, and that I'd like to post about it.

> I'm very much aware that there's been previous

> threads on this issue, but I have no interest in

> revisiting them. I've used this estate agents

> recently and just wanted to post my experience,

> inky own thread. Not looking to flame, not looking

> to irritate, just want to post my thoughts, but I

> feel I can't as I'll be told by all and Sunday

> that this has been discused before, use the search

> engine, and start a slagging match that I'll never

> respond to. But damn your etiquette, why shouldn't

> I be able to post what I want, and why can't those

> that have seen it all before just leave it. Why?

> :(


MP it's a pleasure to see someone who was pisseder than me at the time of posting.

Get some good drinking in now, after Ben Obewan Ben is born you'll have to curtail it somewhat.

In the meantime carry on heroically.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> MP it's a pleasure to see someone who was pisseder

> than me at the time of posting.

> Get some good drinking in now, after Ben Obewan

> Ben is born you'll have to curtail it somewhat.

> In the meantime carry on heroically.


----------------------------------------------------


Ballaqcks dont stop drinking Mockers, once Mrs W**F came down stairs & found me "resting my eyes" with the baby laying across my feet, I'd fed him in the night and then passed out, he must have rolled down my legs where my feet caught him & there he stayed, asleep!



She was mighty impressed I can tell you.



Cheers....




W**F

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm not sure it's sensible  to presume any agreement from interlocutors, but if you do, then I do agree that it's the right thing to say so. My own guess -- it's nothing more -- is that the officers were acting just to effect an arrest on arrival, as requested, quite possibly without any knowledge of the content of wretched tweet at all*, and that their being armed was absolutely incidental.  But I don't know any reliable facts. I do think the turning up (5?) en masse to do so was possibly complacent and unthinking, if there was no reason to believe the arrestee was a threat.  If they had  been doing so for good reason, I guess they could have had at least one weapon trained at him, and had  him hands above head or on the ground in no time.  But I know no reliable facts of the incident whatsoever.  Perhaps they were Father Ted fans -- seriously -- and trogged along, on a quiet afternoon, to see the man himself.  Perhaps they and/or their CO will get a severe bollocking from above.  I don't know. * But even that with some reservations.  The last time I looked up cases on wrongful arrest, years ago, I think I remember there being held then to be at least some onus on the acting arresting officer to be satisfied that  the required grounds for a lawful arrest  did exist.  And I don't know any of the facts of the present case. 
    • They carry guns at the airport.  It may not make it ok but that is a fact.  In France and America they all carry guns.
    • TfL and the Met had a small team a few years ago dedicated to addressing bike theft.  https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2011/february/officers-target-bike-thieves-and-successfully-reunite-stolen-bikes-with-their-owners I assume that went with austerity. There is now a Task Force https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/metropolitan-police-service-cycle-taskforce And some advice from the MPS: https://www.met.police.uk/cp/crime-prevention/keeping-vehicles-safe/how-safe-is-your-bike/ The marking service is good and helps.  As a cyclist you do your best to minimise the likelihood and I would never leave a high end bike locked on the street out of sight.  I've had three bikes stolen in London over the last two decades. Gum Tree sadly makes it too easy and for every bike theft there is someone knowingly or unknowingly prepared to buy a bargain that is stolen.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...