Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know a lot of you are still a little raw over the recent fiasco concerning M.P's and the liberties that they've taken regarding how much they aren't and are allowed to swindle the taxpayer out of.


I personally however would be greatly disappointed if the politicians I'd help elect into power weren't a bit dodgy and didn't make any effort to shit on their constituants from a great height.


You're allowed to nominate on real candidate and another fictional politician be it from a satirical show on politics or any other current affairs broadcasts.


My nominations are as follows.


Jeffery Archer


Archer made a phenomenal impact on the spending culture of the U.K's establishment and made damn sure there was plenty left in the trough for himself.

Whether it be getting involed with insider trading or blatant perjury he was up there with the best. Constantly pimping the system for his own gain.


Sir, I salute you.


My next candidate has to be Ian Richardson's Sir Francis Urquart from the BBC's House Of Card's who was a despicable yet likeable rouge who was capable of brushing aside the most venomous accusations of abuse of office with the legendary line;


"You may very well think that, but I couldnt possibly comment."


Class.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7585-your-favourite-dirty-politician/
Share on other sites

Well, i can't make any promises bbwolf, i can only say i'll do my best!


Although B'stard always makes me think of a combination of Mandleson and Archer, which is an ungodly terrible thought...

I'm going to have to go on a Comic Strip marathon now to purge such thoughts from my mind.

I'm sad to see that so little of you thought my suggestion of Jeffery Archer had the calibre or nerve to take the positian of the most hated M.P


Whether he was selling arms with Mark Thatcher or covering up shady business connections in the energy sector, the man simply didn't give a f_ck about which rules he broke or who he did over in his murky quest for Thatchers ear and admiration.


He didn't give a f_ck to such an extent that he wouldn't even piss on Gerry Adams if he was on fire.


He just didn't give a f_ck.


You can just picture it can't you...


"Mr Archer, there's been a terrible sectarian explosion and hundreds are dead and many are still on fire. Do think you could possibly give us a hand in helping the injured survivors?"


"Errmm...excuse me...I don't know if you're aware of this but I'm not in the habit of giving out f_cks, not even for charity."

Aitken would also do quite well in the "procuring prostitutes for clients" stakes. Not to mention the "getting your own teenage daughter to perjure herself" stakes.


Robert Boothby, Tory MP and at one time an aide to Winston Churchill. Thought to have fathered three children outside of his own two marriages, one of them with Dorothy (wife of Harold) Macmillan with whom he had a long, semi-public affair.


Also probable relationships with Ronald Kray and opposition MP Tom Driberg. Was shouted down when he spoke in the Lords to call for the release on bail of the Krays.

I don't think you can top Aitken and Archer for sleazy crookedness, so i won't even try.


In the fictional stakes, though he doesn't hold a candle to aforementioned, I always liked the caninet secretary Sir Arnold Robinson in Yes Minister, rascally self-serving old scallywag that he was.

What I loved about him was he was indignant enough to try to make personal gain from the defamation he'd suffered (ho ho) and ends up going to prison for perjury (did his daughter get told off?). You couldn't make it up and it just utterly summed up the oily arogance of those Tories. (not like this bullingdon lot, they're noble and cuddly).


Archer was possibly worse for his unabashed worship of Mammon, though frankly Blair is every bit as obsessed in these stakes.


Does Blair count as one of the worst, single handedly drags a nation to a war nobody else wanted because of his religious convictions, and spends the rest of his premiership lying through his back teeth?

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Favourite has to be Alan Clark, old school tory

> charmer and philanderer, maintaing grace, wit and

> even poignancy with dodginess.


Good call Mockney, I feel a fool for not remembering him.


I often credit my base and sickening sense of humour on the combined discovery of the Viz and the Alan Clark diaries at a young age.


Blame my parents.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...