Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know a lot of you are still a little raw over the recent fiasco concerning M.P's and the liberties that they've taken regarding how much they aren't and are allowed to swindle the taxpayer out of.


I personally however would be greatly disappointed if the politicians I'd help elect into power weren't a bit dodgy and didn't make any effort to shit on their constituants from a great height.


You're allowed to nominate on real candidate and another fictional politician be it from a satirical show on politics or any other current affairs broadcasts.


My nominations are as follows.


Jeffery Archer


Archer made a phenomenal impact on the spending culture of the U.K's establishment and made damn sure there was plenty left in the trough for himself.

Whether it be getting involed with insider trading or blatant perjury he was up there with the best. Constantly pimping the system for his own gain.


Sir, I salute you.


My next candidate has to be Ian Richardson's Sir Francis Urquart from the BBC's House Of Card's who was a despicable yet likeable rouge who was capable of brushing aside the most venomous accusations of abuse of office with the legendary line;


"You may very well think that, but I couldnt possibly comment."


Class.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7585-your-favourite-dirty-politician/
Share on other sites

Well, i can't make any promises bbwolf, i can only say i'll do my best!


Although B'stard always makes me think of a combination of Mandleson and Archer, which is an ungodly terrible thought...

I'm going to have to go on a Comic Strip marathon now to purge such thoughts from my mind.

I'm sad to see that so little of you thought my suggestion of Jeffery Archer had the calibre or nerve to take the positian of the most hated M.P


Whether he was selling arms with Mark Thatcher or covering up shady business connections in the energy sector, the man simply didn't give a f_ck about which rules he broke or who he did over in his murky quest for Thatchers ear and admiration.


He didn't give a f_ck to such an extent that he wouldn't even piss on Gerry Adams if he was on fire.


He just didn't give a f_ck.


You can just picture it can't you...


"Mr Archer, there's been a terrible sectarian explosion and hundreds are dead and many are still on fire. Do think you could possibly give us a hand in helping the injured survivors?"


"Errmm...excuse me...I don't know if you're aware of this but I'm not in the habit of giving out f_cks, not even for charity."

Aitken would also do quite well in the "procuring prostitutes for clients" stakes. Not to mention the "getting your own teenage daughter to perjure herself" stakes.


Robert Boothby, Tory MP and at one time an aide to Winston Churchill. Thought to have fathered three children outside of his own two marriages, one of them with Dorothy (wife of Harold) Macmillan with whom he had a long, semi-public affair.


Also probable relationships with Ronald Kray and opposition MP Tom Driberg. Was shouted down when he spoke in the Lords to call for the release on bail of the Krays.

I don't think you can top Aitken and Archer for sleazy crookedness, so i won't even try.


In the fictional stakes, though he doesn't hold a candle to aforementioned, I always liked the caninet secretary Sir Arnold Robinson in Yes Minister, rascally self-serving old scallywag that he was.

What I loved about him was he was indignant enough to try to make personal gain from the defamation he'd suffered (ho ho) and ends up going to prison for perjury (did his daughter get told off?). You couldn't make it up and it just utterly summed up the oily arogance of those Tories. (not like this bullingdon lot, they're noble and cuddly).


Archer was possibly worse for his unabashed worship of Mammon, though frankly Blair is every bit as obsessed in these stakes.


Does Blair count as one of the worst, single handedly drags a nation to a war nobody else wanted because of his religious convictions, and spends the rest of his premiership lying through his back teeth?

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Favourite has to be Alan Clark, old school tory

> charmer and philanderer, maintaing grace, wit and

> even poignancy with dodginess.


Good call Mockney, I feel a fool for not remembering him.


I often credit my base and sickening sense of humour on the combined discovery of the Viz and the Alan Clark diaries at a young age.


Blame my parents.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Its a few years ago now, but I organised my end of year prom (for year 13) at Off the Cuff in Herne Hill - was on the cheaper side to rent and at that age, felt very cool and clubby. I had my own 18th at Whirled Cinema in Loughborough Junction but I'm not sure if they take event bookings like that anymore 
    • You are right . It isn't going to change him for the better. Sending such a negative message is potentially counter-productive. Trump is narcissistic, arrogant, unpredictable, spiteful, divisive, and dishonest, with a penchant for a total a disregard for democratic norms.  He is one who bears a grudge so there's a case to be made for not offending him as he could react with a bunch of  adverse actions  such as  deciding to increase import tariffs on UK exports to the US.      
    • Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...