Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There is a food on the market which reduces the

> sex drive of females by around 70%, it's called

> wedding cake.

>

>

>

>

>

> Thank you to Terry Wogan for that.



I am not amused(6)...next you'll be telling us that the reason women have shorter feet than men is so that they can be closer to the sink!;-)

Well well well. What have we here...


Steve,


The only foodstuffs in the world that can sate a womans appetite for a good old bit of sausage is either chocolate or Jam.


When in the solitary company of chocolate they can think of nothing else but how to snaffle the whole bar without anyone noticing. The notion of male company is alien to the female mind after she's opened a cinema bag of Malteser's.


Jam week put's them right off as well.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> bigbadwolf Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > D.M,

> >

> > What have I done to cause such a stressful,

> angry

> > response?

> >

> > Have you spilt some Jam?

>

>

> Oh dear BBW - thats another week without DM

> speaking to us.


Double standards?


http://www.dulwichmum.net/

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> When in the solitary company of chocolate they can

> think of nothing else but how to snaffle the whole

> bar without anyone noticing. The notion of male

> company is alien to the female mind after she's

> opened a cinema bag of Malteser's.


Please, chocolate isn't that good. The only reason the woman wouldn't want sex with a boyfriend after troughing her way through a cinema sized bag of malteasers is because the action might make her hurl after eating so much. Trust me, if I had a nice boyfriend at home I wouldn't need chocolate.

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The only foodstuffs in the world that can sate a

> womans appetite for a good old bit of sausage is

> either chocolate or Jam.


Oh rilly? Au contraire, I would suggest that it's the fellas who find the jam a little too fruity for their palate...


Stupid myth propagated by squeamish small boys

indiepanda Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Please, chocolate isn't that good.



You can't have tasted the chocs by "Hotel Chocolat"... (aaarrhhhhgggg....gurgling and dribbling with eyes rolled upwards).


Trust me, if I had a

> nice boyfriend at home I wouldn't need chocolate.


You could have BOTH (AND ON THE SAME DAY!);-)

bigbadwolf Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well well well. What have we here...

>

> Steve,

>

> The only foodstuffs in the world that can sate a

> womans appetite for a good old bit of sausage is

> either chocolate or Jam.


That jam thing is true, one of my exes loved eating blackberry jam, she used to eat it with a soft mozzarella type cheese


I'm actually trying to seduce a gorgeous woman at work using Cadburys buttons. So far so good, she even facebooked me to tell me that she was washing em down with a beer...she's soo awesome.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...