Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Emily Matilis is the prime example of a woman newscaster wanting to be a celebrity. She outdoes Katie Derham in her desire to be simultaneously cerebral and pap-worthy.

Kate Silverton looks like Pauline Pens.

Kerplunk is a little Liza Minelli in her innocence - a true innocence that still comes across as phoney. Shame.

Fiona is the best of the lot.

Indeed.


I might even say that the photos were unkind. Or that sniggering at attractive women and implying that they're transvestites is unkind. After all, how many of the men posting are perfect specimens who've never had an off day or been photographed at an unflattering angle?


I might even get started on the fact that female newsreaders are all expected to be young and gorgeous and get replaced whent they're not, but male newsreaders are not.


But I'm sure I'd only be called humourless, or something similar, so I'll leave you to it.

annaj Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Indeed.

>

> I might even say that the photos were unkind. Or

> that sniggering at attractive women and implying

> that they're transvestites is unkind. After all,

> how many of the men posting are perfect specimens

> who've never had an off day or been photographed

> at an unflattering angle?

>

> I might even get started on the fact that female

> newsreaders are all expected to be young and

> gorgeous and get replaced whent they're not, but

> male newsreaders are not.

>

> But I'm sure I'd only be called humourless, or

> something similar, so I'll leave you to it.


See that lad's, another prime example of annaj striding into the boys toilets, and hitting us all round the head with the ruler.


Sorry Miss.

In the greater feminist perspective your arguments are quite sound annaj. Newsreaders should not necessarily be employed because they're young hotties (although that does kind of beg the question what a newsreader is: if you're in the entertainment business you need to be easy on the eye).


However if you do choose to elevate yourself professionally as celebrity totty (with the colour supplements that entails) then you're somewhat hoist by your own petard if people publish unflattering photos alongside.


In much the same way, criticising me for being crap at the javelin is valid if I claimed to be an international javelin impressario.


Your argument smacks of the dirty no good hypocrisy toiled out by celebrities who court press attention when it suits them, and then cry foul when they don't like the coverage given to their self-indulgent divorces.


If female journalists want to be famous for their intellect and insight, I suggest they do a Pilger and naff off to somewhere grimy and do some reportage.


For the record, I am no oil painting, but neither do I try and make money out of being one.

daizie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> BBW, you blow hot and cold all the time . Not so

> long ago you started a thread titled why is annaj

> so awesome! Are you of sane mind ?


Now daizie, you know Women do not like "bland".


Treat 'em mean, keep 'em keen, eh Wolfster?B)

Emily, I haven't read any of the above posts. I've shied away in case anyone got personal about your legs.

See what I did there Emily? Like most men, I'm in love with you.

And just so you know, it's not just the legs. No. That nose of yours. Talk about a news distracter. Don't go changing.

It's thoughts of yourelf that get me from Forest Hill back to East Dulwich on those ocassions when I venture out.

On the 185. Or when misfortunate the 176.


Oh yes, where was I?


Emily! WILL YOU MARRY ME?


I can offer you nothing but my my soul. If indeed the soul exists.


Straight away we're on to what might be a philosophical discussion, and you're apparently the sort of bint what goes for that sort of old toffee. If toffee is the word I'm groping for.


And by the way, great legs.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good ole thinking mans crumpet.

> The top one, rosie someone or other? Awwwwwww

> she's just wuvverwy.



some forumites might be offended by such a comment...


normally I wouldn't mind, as I am sure you are only "having a bit of fun". However, bearing in mind your, relatively strong, objections to some of the postings on the "sex therapist thread", I find your post rather galling...a case of double standards here me thinks

If female journalists want to be famous for their intellect and insight, I suggest they do a Pilger and naff off to somewhere grimy and do some reportage.


Which stands up fine until you notice that male newsreaders are often an obvious 10-20 years older than their female counterparts, and often not exactly Pitt-a-likes: The latest scandal over Strictly judges on the BBC highlights to a certain extent that while women are free to hold any post that a man is, if it's in the public eye they'll get replaced on the grounds of their eye-easiness (and age as a factor by association) long before the fellas will...

Well yes and no BN5, you're calling into question the entire nature of appraised sexuality.


All the usual cliches about men looking for women who are young, healthy and child bearing, whereas women look for men that are established, wealthy and respected in their authority.


Pretty young men in their twenties don't have a chance of reading the news. That's discrimination too I guess.


The evidence suggests that most women don't want Pitt-a-likes anywhere but in sexual fantasies.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...