Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is this true, I can't find anything on it.


I managed to get through the entire series without seeing one episode, or knowing a single housemate's name, which I am very pleased with. However, they are still drawing audiences, and I'd be surprised if it went. Okay, so they don't get the audiences they used to, but still a few million.

Yeah BBC wotsit or ITcrap or whatever it?s on have cut it. Next year will be the last one apparently unless it gets bought by someone else.



Or so I was reliably informed by my brother and sister in-law when they made us eat our tea in front of it when I was visiting recently.

"An average of 2.88m tuned in to (Big Brother) between 10pm and 11.15pm last night

Elsewhere last night, a My Family repeat brought in 3.12m (14.1%) to BBC One at 8.30pm"


I think they should run BB on every channel, seven hours a day. At least 3 million people don't deserve anything better.

This last series of Big Brother was actually very good, and was much more people-watching than a freak show. It was possible to see human emotions/interactions etc to differing situations, it was actually like a drama. There were also some very funny moments too. Another channel will buy it and I will watch it again no doubt.


To actually want it off the telly is a bit strange though, as it's not as if there aren't loads of other channels to choose instead. Isn't there room for this AND whatever it is you want to watch?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If you don't mind al fresco, there is a huge food market by the Royal Festival Hall: https://www.southbankcentre.co.uk/food-and-drink/southbank-centre-food-market/
    • Ahh, that's too bad. The SLP was always on sale in Sainsbury's and always available in libraries. They did some really detailed local crime reporting and local government reporting that other outlets wouldn't focus on.
    • Miranda Sawyer of the (once) Observer has done a piece on festival on Insta which might be of-interest.  Councils are private companies, imo. They make money for themselves, imo.  I do not think by law that they have to follow anything brought up by a consultation, this is for 'face' only - hence, LTNs and everything else.  
    • My understanding is the "free event" is 100% Gala, nothing to do with the council. Obviously Gala will still make money from the food & drink that they are trying to coerce punters into buying on their social media posts. Their costs will be negligible due to already having the infrastructure in place for Gala. So Gala are trying to appear community minded by providing this "free event", but the real goal is to set a precedent for a fourth day's festival - which surely no one could possibly object to?!? - in preparation for applying (again) for two three-day festivals spread over two weekends. It's only another two days, right, and the site & equipment is already there, so why would anyone object?!? More money for the council, much more money for Gala, win-win right? But yet another week of our park taken away from us, too, and another 18,000 people trampling & littering the park, and another week of disturbance for the native birds & wildlife...
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...