Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Flodden Road Barracks has had a major re-furb since Prof M R D Foots' day and is home to London Irish Regiment (TA) as well as attached Companies.


Had the pleasure of drinks in the mess at High Wood in the early 90's

All sorts of military paraphenalia behind the bar, including a missile, which, if memory serves, wasn't quite as deactivated as everyone thought !


21 SAS ® (them !) also paraded out of there at this time.

One of their number had been no less than a certain Sir Ranulph Fiennes

  • 2 weeks later...

:-$

Is it possible to get a copy of the newsletter sent to me in Birmingham? I don't mind having someone's copy after they have finished with it, I am presuming it's a paper copy, I looked at the website but there was no mention of the article, though I was probably looking in the wrong place.


This would be to read the article I hasten to add, not to admire photos of myself!:-S


Thanks

  • 5 months later...
  • 6 months later...
  • 7 months later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 3 months later...

The Roll of Honour of the First Surrey Rifles


Non-Commissioned Officers and Riflemen


Killed in action 23 May 1916



Alleyne, George Albert, rfn, 3067

Baker, Frederick Albert, rfn, 3755

Ball, Horace William, rfn, 650102

Beaton, Stanley, rfn, 1556

Beaty, Walter, rfn, 3842

Bird, Frederick Joseph, rfn, 650581

Blackman, George Dullam, sgt, 1656

Bostwick, Ernest, rfn, 3386

Boulter, William John, rfn, 4403

Breakspear, Vincent, rfn, 651106

Burgess, Albert, lcpl, 1577

Bush, Sidney Charles, rfn, 3999

Clark, Lewis, lcpl, 2063

Clee, Frederick James, lcpl, 2561

Cooper, Lewis, rfn, 651033

Davis, William, rfn, 651257

Davis, John Percy, rfn, 3501

Dobson, William John, rfn, 651281

Drake, Henry, rfn, 3537

Duck, Leslie Sidney, sgt, 650022

Eastlake, Frank Wooton, lsgt, 2121

Elger, Marshall, rfn, 651462

Ellwood, Edward Albert, rfn, 650170

Fitch, Frederick Arthur, rfn, 651277

George, Stephen Penry, lcpl, 2426

Hanrahan, Richard, rfn, 650358

Harlock, Edward Arthur William, cpl, 2951

Harman, Jack Pennington, rfn, 651358

Hart, Stewart William, lsgt, 651005

Hobbs, Sidney, rfn, 3436

Howell, George Albert, rfn, 651336

Jackson, Thomas Henry, lcpl, 2769

Jesset, Joseph Richard, sgt, 1708

Jury, Fredrick Ernest, rfn, 651100

Knight, Morlington Nicholls, rfn, 3569

Lambe, Thomas Herbert, rfn, 2818

Lee, Walter George, lcpl, 2132

Merryweather, Charles Samuel, rfn, 650131

Nelson, Leonard, rfn, 650235

Oxlade, Frank, rfn, 650606

Partridge, William, rfn, 651330

Passey, George Leonard, lcpl, 650404

Pile, Ivor, rfn, 651301

Rundle, Albert Thomas, rfn, 1330

Scholfield, Herbert, rfn, 651437

Silvester, Frederick John, lcpl, 2834

Simpson, Charles Edward, rfn, 3866

Smith, Edward, rfn, 651235

Soper, Stanley, rfn, 651219

Spalding, Edwin Samuel, rfn, 650441

Style, William John, rfn, 651186

Suter, George Frederick, sgt, 650014

Telling, William James, rfn, 1629

Thomas, Victor George, rfn, 651332

Throsby, Alfred, rfn, 1173

Vint, Gerald, rfn, 651355

Walsh, Thomas, rfn, 651565

Ward, Henry Sidney, rfn, 651176

Watson, Archibald William, rfn, 651328

White, Edgar, rfn, 651693

White, Frederick, rfn, 3461

Wilson, Ernest Sidney Leonard, rfn, 1321

Wrigley, William, rfn, 3771

Wyllie, John Malcolm, rfn, 650447



Officers


(Where the Commonwealth War Graves Commission has 23 May 1916 as the date of death)

Edmunds. G., 2nd Lieut

Hunte, A.F., 2nd Lieut

I wrote the article for The Dulwich Society. During my research, I obtained from the Commonwealth War Graves people the complete 'Roll of Honour' of the First Surreys. I have since given the document to the Lambeth Archive as they hold The First Surreys archive. The archive needs some work to catalogue and identify photographs and documents. Perhaps someone would volunteer to do this. It would be a shame not to have this done properly. I was at Dulwich Common several weeks ago and the Memorial area needs a good tidy-up. I should remind you that The Memorial has nothing to do with the First Surreys. Their Memorial is at St Giles Camberwell.

Jeff James wrote an excellent article. I hope many people read it.


I support his appeal for the First Surreys' archive to be properly catalogued, presevered, and perhaps digitised.


I chose this thread because our local Cadet Force has the East Dulwich War Memorial as the focus of remembrance for our local Battalion. I am sorry if I have offended anyone.


John K

  • 3 months later...
  • 1 month later...
The significant Dulwich war memorials can be found in the three cemeteries at Honor Oak. Camberwell Old Cemetery, Camberwell New Cemetery and Nunhead Cemetery all within walking distance of one another. The First World War Memorial in the Camberwell Old Cemetery is impressive, to the right as you go in, and is worth a visit to walk around its 38 acres.
First off, have you visited the Camberwell Old Cememtery or the New Cemetery or Nunhead Cemetery? The 1/12 (Dulwich) used to hold their parade on ground next to the Grove Tavern. There is some information known about them and they served a useful role in preparing men for army service as a draft finding unit. The Dulwich Common memorial is a testament to them. It has nothing to do with the 21st London Regiment (First Surreys). Their memorial is at St Giles', Camberwell. The 1st battalion, 21st Londons recruited widely throughout London and the Home Counties, about 5% of the casualties at High Wood were from the Camberwell district, of a total of 7 officers and 141 men lost on that afternoon. The 2nd battalion were even more diverse in its make-up. During the course of the FWW both battalions receiving large drafts from other regiments including the East Surrey Regiment and the London Rifle Brigade. 24 of he 2nd battalion were to lose their lives when, as part of the Egyptian Expeditionary Force, they were torpedoed off Alexandria at the year end 1917.

It was a really good turn out at the War Memorial this morning. The Pastor of the Church got his congregation there and really boosted the crowd.


There are a couple of issues: There is no sounding of the Last Post and Reveille before and after the Two Minutes Silence and it is sorely missing. I am going to get on to whoever organises the event to see if we cannot get even recordings of the two calls played next year.


The other issue, which I wrote Jonathan Mitchell our local councillor about, was the very dangerous situation that is created by having such a large crowd stood next to a busy road. Something does need to be done about that.


Otherwise I have never seen the memorial so well attended on Remembrance Day. Long may it continue.

I also attended the memorial service today. Echoing the last response it was nice to see so many people there. There was well over 100 people there. Hopefully this will continue.


I have the 2 recordings (reveille and last post). And will happily supply them next year.

The Dulwich Hospital War Memorial was also very well attended this year on Friday with around 50 people.

Very moving to hear all 119 names read aloud.

To think these patients that died didn't die quickly but after many days, weeeks, months of treatment.

I pray my children never have to face a war.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...