Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My perfect child was cycling through Dulwich Village this evening avec au pair, when they were stopped by a police man and given a ?30 fine for cycling on the pavement! I am horrified. It is extremely unsafe for tiny children to cycle on the road through rush hour congested traffic. Do they expect us to collect our children in cars or do they genuinely want our children to get exercise and preserve the environment?


Like everything else, current policies are all about image.


On a week when the news has been filled with horrific tales of a school girl being gang raped in Peckham, why are Southwark police in Dulwich Village outside a junior school harassing cycling parents and child carers? Should they not be protecting the vulnerable of Southwark?


This is symptomatic of a broken Britain. This is a country where career politicians milk the system for everything it is worth. I am still reeling due to Gordon Brown's stupid suggestion of removing tax breaks for working parents. HOW DARE THEY (stomps foot)? Who do they think pays the tax in this country?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8811-outrageous-stomps-foot/
Share on other sites

yes Mr Keef, the au pair was cycling on the pavement too, and yes, I know it looks dreadful. They were coming out of the school gates towards the zebra crossing, and the au pair would have had to cycle on the opposite side of the street from the child, as that is the direction they were heading - in the rain. They should make a cycle path.


Michael dear, you know that my children are tiny. How dare you try to offend me like this, and you know that frowning accentuates my fine lines and wrinkles...

Better than an ASBO, did they take princess's DNA ?


Poor cow, the day the real world crashed in on her


It will require therapy you know, say "Bond Street followed by the apple store then back to Liberty's "


Pit stop at Hix's then home.



Ahh, all better now




W**F

Let's be fair-the police can get it wrong. I got stopped outside Finsbury Park Station's Arsenal shop, wearing a retro 1976 Man City shirt on a drug search-simply because the sniffer dog had just caught a drug carrier. Was I aggrieved? Thought it was pant wettingly funny tbh !

BTW Outragous has an E in it as in Outrageous-teach your kids to spell better than you please OP

Bluerevolution Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> BTW Outragous has an E in it as in

> Outrageous-teach your kids to spell better than

> you please OP




*tongue most firmly in cheek*


Bluerevolution, I could be wrong here but I suspect that the "error" was a mere typo. I simply cannot imagine a woman of DM's breeding being unable to spell. Moreover, she would, almost certainly, have delegated the task of typing the OP to her Housekeeper. God forbid that those freshly varnished and beautifully manicured nails should get chipped.


*tries very hard not to laugh*

Sorry to be predictable but no-one on this forum is able to answer seriously to your ever so serious problem. But if you go to your local Police Ward Panel you can ask them why the fine, and ask them their policies, and have a go at them about the policies, and then feel better you aimed your wrath at the right people.


But poor you, it must be so dreadful. I'd have been so embarrassed, that telling everyone about it on here would have been the last thing I'd have done!

Is it unreasonable to assume that it was the adult rather than the small child cycling on the pavement that caused the police to intervene? As you say, they were coming out of the school gates at the time so perhaps the police were just trying to 'protect the vulnerable of Southwark'- in this instance young children who may be put at risk by an adult cycling on the pavement.


If only the au pair had just got off her bike until she reached the road, and then ridden alongside the nipper on the pavement... well, all this unpleasantness could have been avoided.


*Sigh* good help is sooo hard to find...

Well! I've just been cautioned for driving without due care and attention. Utter nonsense of course, that disabled pensioner was standing mere inches from the kerb, and wasn't even looking in my direction. It's hardly my fault if she didn't see me reversing and her toes were run over.


I'm with DM- I think it's shocking that the police should harass innocent tax payers. They should find better things to do with their time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
    • I cook at home - almost 95% of what we eat at home is cooked from scratch.  But eating out is more than just having dinner, it is socialising and doing something different. Also,sometimes it is nice to pay someone else to cook and clear up.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...