Jump to content

Recommended Posts

While obviously suffering from many of the problems that generally beset the industry, I have to say that Foxtons were actually more realistic in pricing our last property (we used them when moving from Bethnal Green) than most of their competitors, who overvalued the property just to get it on their books. That's not to take away from the sharp practice that they indulge in, but I do wonder if they are unfairly vilified amongst their peers. Are any of the other chains really that much more honest and transparent?

*Bob*, you've described a process that cannot be described as selling. When we moved here from Nunhead the agent we engaged did exactly as you have described, ie opened the door and explained what each room was (as if its not self-explanatory) before showing then out again.


Good selling will get people thinking about how much they would enjoy living in the house, and the area, how well their possesions will fit in it and how aspirational it is. They will also come away with a warm feeling and feel that they are very clever indeed for even thinking of buying the house. They'll also get closed early on to avoid idiot timewasting.


Agents who cannot even be bothered to sell will, quite rightly, find themselves out of business in no time once Foxtons kick off.


with luck, the days of paying a poorly trained halfwit 3% to open your front door and say "and this is the hall", are over in ED.

bald marauder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> While obviously suffering from many of the

> problems that generally beset the industry, I have

> to say that Foxtons were actually more realistic

> in pricing our last property (we used them when

> moving from Bethnal Green) than most of their

> competitors, who overvalued the property just to

> get it on their books. That's not to take away

> from the sharp practice that they indulge in, but

> I do wonder if they are unfairly vilified amongst

> their peers. Are any of the other chains really

> that much more honest and transparent?



No, not really, we despise them all.

Nah they're all bastards. 'tis the nature of the game. I blame the television and the communists.


I think Ken should bring in a new regulation the forces them all to use Smart cars or mopeds and to provide off street parking for their employees so they don't clog up our highstreets whith those bloody awfully painted cars.

Anyone who honestly thinks being a successful estate agent involves anything more taxing than:


a. Use of the correct key to get the door open

b. Ability to say things like: "Nice big lounge" or "Great outside Space" or "Period Features"


is either


a) Mad as a hatter

b) An estate agent

c) The spouse of an estate agent

*bob*:


voice of reason - I've never worked out why I'm supposed to pay 5k for someone printing photos and holding keys.


I've been to look at a few properties recently and the agents have been utterly useless - worse than useless in fact as they just agree with my comments.

Scum. Verbose, greedy, Stupid, shouty vermin. every single one of them.


They exist in cartel to keep themsleves in the money and to exclude interlopers. Every horrible baord they erect should be registered and taxed heavily by the local authority. Their nasty vulgar cars should be made to pay extra for parking on LL or environs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...