Jump to content

North Cross Road sub station - art installation


Recommended Posts

I've been inspired by the existing proposal..


Couldn't we have a giant Excel Spreadsheet, upon which residents could plot the course of house prices, with a can of red spray paint?


Living art, if you will. That'll be ?2800, please.


file.php?5,file=8532

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tomdhu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Absolute waste of money.

>

> A hair-brained idea if ever there was one

> -especialy in these difficult economic times.

>

> There are many more pressing needs to be met -

> such as repairing the huge number of new pot holes

> in the roads in E.D. caused by the recent frost

> damage.

>

> Come up with more of these silly ideas and you

> certainly won't get many votes next time there is

> an election.



Sorry to be negative but I have to almost fully concur with this too. The trouble with some of the liberal policies are that they sound great in an idealistic world but this sadly reminds me why I don't vote for them. I am sure they DO a lot of good work but this just illustrates nonsense and a waste of money. You will never ever please everyone with any public art installation so good luck with the public consultation.

I also agree with Sue - i walk past there everyday and have never seen graffiti so wonder how much this would 'save'. the planting idea is a lovely one with clear benefits IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JBARBER Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Woah.

> > Every year the council spends money removing

> > graffiti from this wall.

>

> xxxxxxxx

>

> Really? I pass it virtually every day as I live

> just off North Cross Road. Don't mean to

> disbelieve you but I don't recall ever having seen

> any graffiti on it?



Efficient aren't they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The service typically removes graffiti within 24hours.

Equally, I personally love the idea of green walls.It will be interesting to see what people say.

I recall the Goose Green roundabout. It never occurred to me a palm tree but that's what people wanted and its rather grown on me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think they voted for a palm tree, as I recall they had a few options including sculpture - thank God we didn't get that - and most people (including me) voted for a tree.


Someone at the council then decided a palm tree would fit in with East Dulwich's Victorian past.


I didn't like it until I found out why they'd planted it but once I understood the background I did :)


However I don't think anyone could persuade me to like vinyl flowers .....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> North-facing wall = climbing hydrangea

>

> But I suppose it would get nicked...


xxxxxxx


Nah, not suitable, not evergreen I think, though very lovely :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a fantastic british response to a particularly ugly wall and suggestions to tart it up


Whilst I like the idea of covering it and enjoyed the joke re: using excel, is it THAT hard for people to just live a little? It's possible to travel around this world and see everything from vibrant murals to minimalist designs (a la this one) but as soon as you come back to England, urban living is just one big "meh" because people would rather say no and cry "liberal policies"! (I mean for F*** sake!!!)


I don't LOVE any of the designs and I'm no good myself at design, but I sure would prefer any of them to what's there at the moment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What a fantastic british response to a

> particularly ugly wall and suggestions to tart it

> up

>

> Whilst I like the idea of covering it and enjoyed

> the joke re: using excel, is it THAT hard for

> people to just live a little? It's possible to

> travel around this world and see everything from

> vibrant murals to minimalist designs (a la this

> one) but as soon as you come back to England,

> urban living is just one big "meh" because people

> would rather say no and cry "liberal policies"! (I

> mean for F*** sake!!!)

>

> I don't LOVE any of the designs and I'm no good

> myself at design, but I sure would prefer any of

> them to what's there at the moment



What he said.


I quite like the first one as it goes. Also, given the way the wall is, I reckon something good could be done with quite directional lighting and shadows for the night time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

alternatives:


- massive led display of current RBS stock price

- big television constantly on and tuned to QVC

- montage of b&w athena posters, kittens in wellies etc

- climbing wall

- scrolling stephen fry twitter feed

- that punching wall on Wipe-out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Am I the only one thinking ?2,200 for 44 diabond

> vinyl art squares!?! Let me know if you want them

> cheaper.


It's the design that costs the money, Mark. The ideas.


Though personally I think if you really do want something that looks like was designed by local primary school children (circa 1974) it seems a bit mean not to at least ask them in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the criticism RE using Excel is duly justified.


How anyone can contemplate pitching for/doing this sort of work seriously but not manage to put-together a basic 'this is what it would look like' type shot on their computer is just.. poor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Piffle.


The most effective deterrent is to have the graffiti removed as soon as possible. Within 24 hours. The graffiti 'artists' get totally peed-off it their work is swiftly obliterated. Their time, effort and investment have been totally wasted if it's no longer there for them and their mates to marvel at. That?s when they give up.


To reduce the cost to the council, the ones to remove it should be those who have been sentenced to community service.


Fixing the pot holes, as suggested, is much better use of our money. I suggest James you have a look at Matham Grove and other streets off LL. The potholes there are developing fast and there's an urgent need to do something.



It appears that some councillors have failed to appreciate the need to maintain existing infrastructure - like the roads - hence the road surfaces became vulnerable to frost damage which leads on to pot holes. Instead you want to splash tax money on a totally needless arty farty project that isn?t even art.


The sooner you are off the council the better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about approaching a local(ish) college or university students and set them a competition brief with a prize of say ?200 and the winning concept can spend up to ?300 on material and installation etc. I'm still concerned as to who "designed" it because I'm not convinced it was an artist or designer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I like is the fact that the coucnil would like to do something here. This is a great opportunity to develop some form of identity.


North Cross Road is or has the potential to be one of London's hidden gems, you just need to look at Columbia Road for inspiration. Columbia Road has a pretty clear identity, developed over time by stall holders and miniimal interference from the council.


The council should ideally engage some fairly progressive and respresentative poeple from the community to develop a brief which could be responded to by some of London's great creative talent... not a council contractor?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
    • Check the link I provided above. It’s gives a very full account of where the push for LTNs came from, (in brief, central government). The consultation did not show that the majority of local residents were against the LTN. Not for the first time, you’ve confused a ‘consultation’ with a ‘referendum’. The outcome of local elections (which many opposed to LTNs excitedly promoted as a referendum on the scheme), suggested they are actually quite popular. All the polling on LTNs generally, also shows majority support across London.
    • Rockets said: "Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway" This.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...