Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just thought this ought to be made known. A letter came from the school with this information.


On Monday afternoon two girls from my son's school were followed by a man. He followed them into a quiet road and then picked one of them up and tried to run off. Luckily the girls made enough noise screaming to get people out of their houses and the man let go of her and ran away.


The police were called and have his description but I thought that people on this forum ought to be made aware in order to take precautions for a while.


I'm not scaremongering, rather passing on information.

I do not in any way dislike children, and I take this advice as seriously as the next person (if it is true). I do not however support the idea of a lynch mob style thread, where we do not know all the information and are relying on the word of one forum member. Tabloid style bashing based on limited information is not my style, or anyone elses on this forum.

I wouldn't worry about it. Every time I see Louisa's name on a posting I can't help thinking of 'The Childcatcher' from Chitty Chitty Bang Bang.


More irritating/laughable is her continual usage of 'emoticons' after every posting, like a three year old let loose packet of wax crayons.

  • Administrator

Louisa consider yourself warned for your behaviour, this is the first time anyone has ever been warned and hopefully the last.


You have hijacked a serious thread in order to be vindictive against another user which in my book is unnecessary and just plain wrong. Please have consideration for the nature of a thread. Also purposefully trying to get a thread Lounged (where it will be seen by less people), especially this thread is out of order.


Some messages unrelated to the thread's title have been removed, apologies to those who wrote them but I think you'll understand why I did it.


regards

sorry to be a bit sceptical, but why hasn't this been followed up on the news? surely 2 events should qualify for london tonight?

why have there not been signs up from the police. i nice big yellow board would help raise awareness very quickly.


[changed to lowercase, please don't write in all capital letters- The Administrator]

I'm assuming the school issued the letter as it was an unusual and random event and wanted the parents to be aware of it. If it happened all the time they wouldn't need to issue letters.

As the school felt it was important enough to issue a letter, I felt it was important enough to pass on the information.

Is the sceptisism about the event occuring or that I'm making the whole thing up?

If there is any from me, it's not sceptisism about you or the letter being real Asset - honest guv


But something doesn't sit 100% - if the school had seen suspicious behaviour I would have thought that warrants a letter to parents.


But in the wake of recent events if someone actually got hold of a child and ran for it but was foiled (after an allegedly similar recent event in the area we later learn) then I would have thought at the very least BBC London would be at the scene and covering it? And if not why not?


ed-pete: I'm not saying it didn't happen. But saying it definitely happened when you are at least twice removed doesn't make it a case-closed. And if it definitely did happen are we absolutely sure this wasn't play-acting amongst people who know each other? That could sound harsh I know but just trying to square the facts. I repeat - if this did genuinely happen and there were witnesses I would expect more than a letter from a school (that sort of thing used to be for poor grades!) - I would want media coverage with on site reporters saying "have you seen the person who matches this description?"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • For Plusnet, I pay £31.99 for Full Fibre 500.  (the number is the line speed you have paid for) I have recently recontracted.  Always phone them up, and ask what deal they can do for me.  Usually get a decent reduction.  Sue, I would suggest you call them, especially if you are close to contract renewal.  Sometimes they will change deals mid-contract, as I have found in the past.      
    • The drivers generally have the same set area to cover every day, so they're fairly easy to follow - quite often on bike. They organise their drops to maximise how many they can do within a given time - there's actually software at the depot to do this before they set off - so they tend to follow the same route. Certain addresses are delivery hotspots, some have two or three drops a day from the various couriers. It all adds up doorstep deliveries being incredibly easy to target. I suspect Vladi's neighbour hasn't had their fake parcel nicked, not because of their security, but because the thief simply wouldn't have seen the driver stop there, so there's nothing to steal. The losses are factored in, driving prices up for everyone, and the drivers are treated abysmally. It's a dreadful business. It needs regulating.   Sorry, cross post with Angelina and Alec1
    • Amazon seem to do this more and more now.  They don't even ring the doorbell, just leave them lying on the door step, then you find out it's been delivered when you check tracking.  The official Amazon vans are frequently followed on their routes by thieves and take the opportunities freely given.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...