Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A little while ago Amelie wrote about possible plague pits under Peckham Rye.


So what is buried under Peckham Rye?


That's Peckham Rye proper, not Peckham Rye Park where the remains of Homestall Farm and the big mansions are well documented.


I can think of these:


The foundations of the bandstand.


The basin of the boating lake.


The public air raid shelter


The remains of the open air swimming pool.


Is there anything else?


The last time I walked down Forest Hill Road some of the remains of the swimming pool still protruded from the ground. It was quite interesting to try to work out what all the visible bits and the landscaped mounds once were. But it's a bit of a cheat when you remember the pool in its full glory.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/993-whats-buried-under-peckham-rye/
Share on other sites

I read somewhere that there are claims for Peckham Rye to have been the site of Boudicca's (Queen of the Iceni tribe) final battle in AD 60 - which I had always understood to have been in NE London on the edge of Epping Forest - anyone have any views / knowledge of this?

Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I read somewhere that there are claims for Peckham

> Rye to have been the site of Boudicca's (Queen of

> the Iceni tribe) final battle in AD 60 - which I

> had always understood to have been in NE London on

> the edge of Epping Forest - anyone have any views

> / knowledge of this?

A frie3nd who lives close to One Tree Hill said that was the location from which she watched the battle.


Question...did Epping's forest exists in AD60, not many trees look to be 1950 years old......?

And another thing, how old do trees get before they die.???

Found this on the Peckham Society web site





BURY BOUDICCA MYTH - Spring 2005


Noticeboards on Peckham Rye start the history of the common with "The first legend about Peckham Rye Common dates back to 60 AD when it is alleged that the Roman General Suetonius Paulinus defeated the British Queen Boadicea at Peckham Rye." There are enough myths of Peckham without Southwark Council perpetuating this myth. The noticeboards should be changed as soon as possible and include only accurate history of our common.

In Boudicca: The Warrior Queen M. J. Trow (Sutton Publishing, 2003) states: "We do not know where the battlefield was. Given the details of the earlier campaign when Boudicca?s army had destroyed Camulodunum (today?s Colchester), Londinium (London) and Verulamium (St Albans), Roman expert Malcolm Todd surmises a site in Hertfordshire, not far north of the last place of attack. Folklore places it much nearer to London, perhaps close to the present King?s Cross station. Most experts today, however, favour Mancetter, along Watling Street, the Roman road in Warwickshire." The book makes no mention of Peckham Rye.

In the spring 2000 issue of our magazine (no. 79) we stated: "No one knows where the final confrontation between Boadicea and Suetonius took place. A site in what is now Leicestershire, near Mancetter, to the south-east of Atherstone and close to the line of Watling Street, has been suggested by Graham Webster, the leading authority on the revolt, who wrote Boudica (B.T. Batsford, 1993).?

Sounds highly unlikely to me. Southwark Council would never have allowed it for one, 240 000 soldiers tramping through the flower beds? I think not. Anyway as a tactical matter you wouldn?t position your army somewhere where they were open to numerous attacks from un-disciplined staffies running about off their leads.

I have heard the Boudicca legend too, it would mean that the Iceni and their allies would have crossed the Thames going south. This is possible but Londinium then did not extend much beyond what is now the City of London, although there were cemeteries in Southwark, you have to wonder if there would have been anything for the tribes to destroy. Perhaps it was the 'let's drive them into the sea' theory. There is nothing in the subsequent accounts, admittedly written much later, that suggests that the Thames was crossed by the tribes during the uprising. It is strange however that they burned Londinium to the ground and then appear not to have done much more afterward. Exhaustion perhaps or being surprised by the lack of opposition.


Britain was heavily forested right up to the Middle Ages, Epping Forest is a shadow of its former self, it is classified as Ancient Woodland and dates from about 8000BC and used to cover almost the whole of Essex.

Peckham Rye park was orignally called Homestall Farm, and this name survives in a local road name. Below is a picture of the farm before it was sadly destroyed in 1908. This was the last farm in Southwark to survive the onslaught of the mighty London suburbs in the second half of the 19th century. What remain of the ruins (very little now sadly), are situated in a group of trees located near the "japanese gardens" close to the centre of the park.


http://www.ideal-homes.org.uk/images/southwark/peckham/homestall-farm-00271-640.jpg

The base of the chimney stack are still in place behind a group of trees, and you can actually work out the expanse of the building. Below is a painting of the building from a different angle. It's well worth a wander on a sunday afternoon. http://www.ideal-homes.org.uk/images/southwark/peckham/peckham-rye-01683-750.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Work such as dry rot treatment will have a guarantee.  Major works as such are more general and I've not seen guarantees on any I've had done. You need to find the source of the damp and the cause of it and be able to demonstrate that it's down to the works that have been done.
    • Thanks for all of the thoughts. I have a letter from searches which outlines the scope of work but doesn't mention any work guarantee as far as I can see. I agree that next step is to check directly with the major works team. Tim .
    • I thoroughly recommend Jay from JK Electrical Contractors who is an NICEIC registered. NICEIC is the UK's leading certification body for the electrical contracting industry and conducts regular audits and assessments on all its members. It is the specialist trade body which certifies professional electricians.  Jay completed the installation of a 19 way consumer unit for us and works to the highest standards and our entire electrical installation is now fully compliant with 18th Edition of the electrical wiring regulations. Before installing the new CU he traced and corrected faults that had developed over the last 25 years -some of which were my DIY bodges that were non-compliant.  We now have an installation that is 100% safe and  reliable . His contact details are :- 0208 150 6450 [email protected] Here is what he installed for us.
    • I fully support this petition, however it will need to be shared far & wide to be effective. Also there is always a huge amount of interest / objection during the festival, but not so much when they start consulting for the next one, usually around January. It's crucial that everyone that has been impacted makes their voice heard then.  A couple of points which may be good to include in the wording (if it is still possible to amend?) - The total tickets sold are way more than 3000. The licence allows a capacity of up to 9,999, but this may include staff & performers etc. The published attendance for 2024 was:  Friday – 8,999 / Saturday – 9,512 / Sunday – 9,422 So that's c.28,000 people trampling & littering our park over three days - people who have no need or desire to take any care or consideration of our park.  - Gala claim for 2024 that "62% of all ticket holders were from Southeast London and 18% of these were from hyper-local postcode areas SE15 and SE22." So a bit of maths shows that means that around 89% of attendees were not what most people would term 'local'... - Gala have ambitions / plans to extend the number of event days to 6, over two weekends. They applied for a licence for this in 2024, but then withdrew it. Instead they added a "free" event, billed as a community day, to the existing 3 day festival, thereby increasing the event days to 4.  This would appear to be an attempt to set a precedent for increasing the number of event days, and it's inevitable that they will attempt to secure the 6 days they desire for 2026, to increase their profits further. Two weekends in a row of noise, disturbance & disruption would be unacceptable, plus an extra c.18,000 trampling & littering the park... - The site size has been increased. The claim is that it is to compensate for lost storage space due to recent flood alleviation works, but the area has increased by more than the area lost, and appears to have been used for attendee activity rather than site storage. Gala have often stated that the festival can only be located in the park because the footprint has been designed specifically for that area, and yet this year the footprint had been amended & extended without any apparent issues. Surely this proves that it could be relocated?  Apologies, I just can't help going into rant mode on this issue, but hopefully some of the above may be helpful in increasing the argument presented by the petition?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...