Jump to content

Southwark School Street Closure Scheme


Recommended Posts

Seems like this scheme that was initiated last September has already been given the go ahead in Southwark - Bessemer Grange Primary School being the first in the pilot.


Local people in the neighbourhood were not consulted and there have been effects in the local area. It now seems there will be another one being introduced in Robert Browning Primary in Walworth as per the councillor in a photo in the Southwark News last week.


Any thoughts about this and about how it will affect local areas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be disruptive for residents but, living opposite a local school and being witness to the utterly idiotic and dangerous driving of quite a lot of parents on a daily basis - even when the police are around - i?m 100% supportive of this new scheme.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I walk past Bessemer grange on way to work occasionally. Seems a reasonable idea, only issue I see is if residents in the zone need to drive somewhere in the closure, be it work, shopping, hospital or whatever.


Can the yellow barriers can be moved quite easily and quickly if really needed?


Why did they introduce this scheme? Have kids in the borough been injured by cars outside schools?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These school streets are not only about making the roads safer for kids to cross, but to reduce pollution around schools and to help encourage active modes of transport (not least for those who will find it less easy to drive as a result of the street closure!). If parents can't drop kids off near the school gates they are less likely to sit with engines idling and this would cut localised pollution around the schools. Suspect Bessemer has been chosen as a test as the area is easier to restrict than others just from a road layout perspective.


I note that Passiflora states there 'have been effects in the local area' - assume this is in terms of pushing parking further out but would be interesting to understand.


Based on my limited understanding of the ones I've seen discussion on, the residents would still be able to enter and leave the zone but anyone else could not. The hours of operation are fairly limited so you'd expect that the amount of residents needing to drive in and out of a defined area during the school street times would be fairly low.


Driving kids to school in London is inappropriate - we have so many schools nearby and the distance by which places are offered is very small and all schools are served by local bus routes. Just to clarify, I'm not talking about kids / parents with mobility issues or other disabilities that could make travelling to school in other ways difficult, but the vast majority of pupils in any school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

School streets is a fantastic initiative. Anyone interested should watch this short video on how it has been implemented at a school in Hackney which is on a busy road, a bus route. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwVRosXefEg. This shows that it's very possible to implement on streets which are busy, where it's obviously needed most.


Southwark have committed to increasing the number of School Streets this year. Please email your Councillor if it's something you care about to show support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Southwark Cyclists website report on School Streets


https://southwarkcyclists.org.uk/school-street-trial-goes-permanent-more-coming/


I think one of the important points is that this follows "soft" attempts to stop parents driving their kids to the school gate: the zig zag lines, traffic wardens, school publicity campaigns and banners, and now temporary barriers. The schools have to work quite hard to implement the closures which suggests that the staff place a lot of importance on the benefits: cleaner air, road safety and encouraging active travel to school

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This scheme seems great. Reduce air pollution, encourage people to walk and cycle for school drop and collection, likely decrease in danger from traffic. 8-9am and 3-4pm.


I'd like Melbourne Grove (northern end) around Jarvis Road to be trialled.

Goose Green Primary School seems another good candidate.


Each has one road so relatively straight forward and I had concerned residents and parental casework.


Which schools do other people think prime local candidates?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James Barber said:


... Goose Green Primary School seems another good candidate.


Each has one road so relatively straight forward and I had concerned residents and parental casework...


Isn?t Goose Green Primary the one near Goose Green Roundabout/Bellingham Road. Where is its main entrance, Tintagel Rd?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I support initiatives to discourage ppl driving children to school ,there is a distinction between using a vehicle solely to get a child to school and those who are dropping a child off and then continuing their journey to work/hospital appt/drop another child off at a different school .


Obviously this isn't ideal but sometimes it's the only way that some can keep all the balls they are juggling up in the air .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I asked for thoughts about the scheme and specifically how it would affect the local area but as usual the bicycle community have to get on board about things even though they are usually the last ones to reach their destination on time. Walking into the area is best if you live in the catchment area.


Bessemer Grange has expanded into a very large primary school in recent years and so there have been parents bringing in their children from far and wide and mostly by car, some just around the corner in the car.


The yellow barriers have been put up outside the three street entrances onto Bessemer (since last Sept/Oct) in term time but with no consultation with the local neighbourhood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Passiflora Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I asked for thoughts about the scheme and

> specifically how it would affect the local area

> but as usual the bicycle community


One person leaving a perfectly sensible comment and a link to this exact issue.


have to get on

> board about things even though they are usually

> the last ones to reach their destination on time.


What does that mean? And even if it made any sense, how is it relevant?


Are cyclists not allowed to comment on traffic management now? Do they not use the streets?


What you really mean is that, with your usual pro-car anti-traffic-management stance, is that you object to this scheme and were hoping to get loads of support; now it turns out most commenters are in favour you have to find a scapegoat. Silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are many schools around East Dulwich, so yes it is valid to ask how simultaneously closing off myriad streets adjacent to those schools every day will impact the area.


It seems that the favourite trick of doing it a street at time is once again being employed but it won't be until they are all closed at the same time that the true impact will be felt. Quite a few schools sit on major access routes into and out ED.


Why not ask each school to campaign with the parents whose children attend and ask them not to drive in?


And there should be a major consultation across the community before such far reaching measures are taken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly I don?t think closing roads will stop people driving. They will simply park in the nearest available street. I went to a meeting about the building of the Harris primary school and asked about parking as there?s was clearly not going to be any onsite parking. I was told that the catchment area for the school would be very small and a condition for getting a place was that children would all walk, cycle or use public transport to get to school. I said it would never work. It hasn?t. Children from far and wide go there and the parents park wherever they want. Nothing will stop people driving their children to school.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, a number of parents will continue to drive to school but from my experience I have noticed many taking alternative forms of transport including: walking and cycling.


The closure of the road outside the school helps to reduce pollution in and around the school.


I have noticed it has been much safer walking my child to school in the mornings with the road closure. If residents need to get in/out a member of the school team is on the road to quickly move the barrier for access.


Does not appear to have affected traffic in the area as only in force for short period morning and afternoon. Agree with a school by school approach as best way to slowly implement, giving people chance to adapt. May be trickier to implement with schools on main roads.


We need to do as much as we can do reduce pollution and improve road safety in the area, particularly for our children.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A very large proportion of children at Harris do walk in but there are all kinds of reasons why a few people might come by car. Not the least of which is that people do move house and are no longer in the immediate area. Some people have to drive to their work or might even need a car for work and can't be expected to walk back home again after dropping kids. But it's only a very small minority who are in this position. The vast majority do walk.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Parents are still able to drive and park, just not right outside the school.


From my experience this has made the roads much safer as parents are not parking inconsideratly, causing jams or racing to get their child to school just in time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

singalto Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sadly I don?t think closing roads will stop people

> driving. They will simply park in the nearest

> available street. I went to a meeting about the

> building of the Harris primary school and asked

> about parking as there?s was clearly not going to

> be any onsite parking. I was told that the

> catchment area for the school would be very small

> and a condition for getting a place was that

> children would all walk, cycle or use public

> transport to get to school. I said it would never

> work. It hasn?t. Children from far and wide go

> there and the parents park wherever they want.

> Nothing will stop people driving their children to

> school.


As a new school, the catchment was quite wide for the first year and perhaps the second, as people were effectively taking a leap into an untested school. As the school has progressed the catchment has got progressively smaller and is now very local. So there are some parents who drive from further distances but the vast majority walk and over the years the proportion of students who come from any great distance will further reduce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am writing as an American parent of a child in Bessemer. I only qualify myself as an American because in our school system there, we had a method of fluid driving drop offs that could happen here. I offered my suggestions to the Head and she gave a pretty candid response. First, fluid driving drop off can't happen until the zig zags go away. Second, they have, according to her over the years, tried different methods to prevent the mass car chaos. One of them was organizing staff to meet at Sainsbury's parking lot and walk the children over (there is a footpath from there to the School) and there was little to no participation so they stopped. This seemed to be the best option to me, but parents were not on-board. Lastly, with the road being so close (as with so many schools in London) to the school entrances (there are three entry points depending on what year the kids are in), bottle-necking and unsafe conditions for the children were concerns (not to mention the pollution).


I am truly sorry the residence of the affected area were not consulted. However, this parent is truly grateful that I do not have to worry about car traffic and pollution while getting my daughter to school. Please keep in mind that her building is across from the main building (older years) and knowing we don't have to worry about traffic going and coming from school is a huge weight lifted from this mom's shoulders.


As of now, the barriers are easily movable (on wheels), but it is my understanding that this test was to eventually be made permanent with permanent barriers and I'm not sure how easy those would be for residents.


It is probably worth noting that I do not drive and do not have to commute to work. We walk and/or bus it to school. However, knowing that the Sainsbury's parking lot is a 5 minute (or less) walk to school would just mean I'd use that if I did.


Again, sorry for the local resident inconvenience, but this mom thanks you for your unconsulted and perhaps unwanted participation.


Jenna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • If he achieves half of these then that will be some legacy.  Put aside your dislike of the man and look at the positives.  All politicians fail to deliver all of their pledges - a fact of life, doesn't make it right but things get in the way or priorities change. You can look at Livingstone, ignoring his later demise, and see him as a force of change and supporting the ordinary Londoner.  He said he was going to bring back bus conductors.  How silly.  70p fixed bus fair in outer London.  Just wouldn't work - instead a pound to travel wherever you were going on the bus.  Sounded daft, but we've had the single fair for, well, must be 20 years now. Interesting review of Johnson's 2019 pledges.  He fully met his target for a bad Brexit.  So lots of ticks there, but after that, pretty poor.  https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/annex-conservative-manifesto-half-time-analysis.pdf Sunak almost an abject failure, but when we get some clarity on Labour we will be having discussions on some of their failures in years to come.
    • That's true on the one hand. On the other hand they had deliveries going out, which presumably required the kitchen, which was not "shutting". There were other customers eating in  who appeared to have just got their food. Given we were an hour and a half ahead of the publicised closing time, not "half an hour before closing time", it did not cross our minds to call ahead to book. In any case we had been out all day, our journey home involved two trains and two  buses,   and we didn't know what time we would be back. Plus if a business "reacts to demand", it should say that its opening times may vary. Monkatsu clearly says on its website that it is open from 5-10 on Sundays to eat in or take away. Eating out anywhere is a "first world" thing, and yes there might have been alternatives,  but we had chosen to eat at Monkatsu!  It's not as if we had got there at 5 to 10 and expected to be served!  My post was to ask if anyone else had experienced the same thing. I wasn't expecting to be attacked for living in the first world and also  apparently  for having unrealistic expectations that information on a business website would be correct 🙄
    • Swifts ahoy! Heard them for the first time this year wheeling over East Dulwich at lunch time.  
    • 2. In times when police are leaving in ever decreasing numbers and recruitment is hard, how will he put more police on the streets ?  3. Rough sleeping, no matter what is done, some still choose that way of life, so what's his plan in that case ?      my guess for #2 would be that 14 years of this govt has done much to drive that exodus - an incoming new government is likely to take some steps to repair relations and make the offer more attractove   re #3 - this questions arises every time there are a lot of people sleeping rough but as we all saw under the last labour government, those numbers reduced dramatically. Again, the London mayor will benefit from that   Have people given up all hope that anything might ever get better ever - it did under last labour govt and whilst this one has a much harder job on it's hands, targets like this are at least honestly on their todo list (overall I would say that Khan list of targets is, charitably, "ambitious" as things stand in 2024. But they are positive targets and something to aim for. Compared to whatever it was that Hall was offering, it's the better of the two options)    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...