How very odd. I find myself vaguely aligned with AFN. Never thought I'd see the day, but nice to see you sounding and writing like a rational human being too ;-) I would disagree with you in that GLobalism is actually driven by Imperialism, not Capitalism. Governments have all the power, the banks and corporations are tolerated only as long as their goals continue to coincide with governments'. Hence why globalism has been pushed through on national agendas by governments. Should this relationship break down watch how the legislative and particularly the executive demonstrate who has the real power. I fear you may have been reading too much Philip Bobbit; interesting though he is I think he's utterly wrong, the nation state has some legs in it yet. Ooh, and not sure about this erosion of borders. Globalism does try to get rid of barriers to trade, but it's rather one sided and basically just a more sophisticated version of the old 'open door' policy, the US's first bash at imperialism in China. Borders for people haven't really disappeared anywhere else, you try going to the US or Russia if you think this the case, it really ain't that easy. The one place we've seen it go is within Europe and I'd say that it was primarily driven by idealism, though I'm not naive enough to believe that movement of capital wasn't a big driver, I don't for a second connect it with globalism as it has actually cost the rich a fortune to the benefit of the poor, ask the Portuguese, Greek, Spanish or Irish.