Sue

El Presidente Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Seems minor You think it's minor that somebody has to leave their baby unattended in a public place while they go and move somebody else's bins? Doesn't seem minor to me. It's stressful enough moving house without having an issue like this on top of it. Hope you sort it out soon, OP.

rendelharris Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/croydon-cat- > killer-unmasked-police-reveal-culprits-after-three > -year-investigation-and-500-deaths-a3940956.html Thanks Rendel, that's a very interesting article. Pity the vet didn't do a proper job on the post mortems in the first place, eh. Might have avoided a lot of hysteria. I'm a bit surprised they got the same vet to look at them again, though - and surprise surprise he found puncture marks this time. How come he missed them on so many bodies before??? John of Chener Books always said he reckoned a lot of these supposedly-killed cats were initially the victims of road accidents.

intexasatthe moment Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > RH I was thinking that it would just be a way of > excusing their lack of progress and interest . From the report linked to above, it seems that far from lacking in interest and not progressing the case, in fact the Met have done a very thorough review of the evidence, in conjunction with various other bodies. I don't really know why people are so keen for there to be a cat killer on the loose. I'd have thought they'd have been delighted that there wasn't. ETA: Sorry RH, hadn't read your post at the time I posted this - I think we are saying the same things!

DulwichBorn&Bred Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The tracking said it?s out for delivery or it has > no information hence the waiting in! > Oh, how annoying!

Mscrawthew Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think any one of the many owners that have come > to discover the remains of their family pets not > only with missing body parts but some returned to > their locality with said body parts neatly placed > either on the body or blatantly in the view of the > owners and proven to be detached from the body > with a sharp instruments may disagree with the > underfunded police forces in the U.K. Are you able to refer us to some reliable reports of this proof, please?

Bic Basher Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I've been told unofficially that they're three > postmen down. Is that permanent, or due to sickness/holidays? If permanent, surely they can recruit some more?

DulwichBorn&Bred Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I?ve had parcels ordered from beginning of > September that still haven?t arrived despite being > sent with tracking numbers via Royal Mail. > Frustrating as I?ve been waiting in for nothing! Sorry to be dim, but isn't the whole point of having a tracking number that you know where the parcel is in the system, so you don't have to wait in unless you know for sure it's coming that day? Have I misunderstood, or has the system gone wrong?

What a shame John of Chener Books isn't here to see this. He always held there was no cat killer, and was roundly criticised by the SNARL defenders.

dickens Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Yes, you're right we need to find the cause as > well. Godden came this morning and it's not > subsidence thank god. We are going to go ahead and > get them to fix it. I'll let you know how it goes. What else could cause a building to move?

There would be more police around, and more within easy distance of the crime, even if not on the same road. Also with more patrolling, the criminals could not be sure one would not suddenly appear. That's a deterrent in my book.

Helen Hayes is a brilliant MP for Dulwich.

It's easy enough to get to Tooting from here. Bus to either Oval or Elephant, then Northern Line.

civilservant Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > i note that Lyttle Minx and Tart now stand > side-by-side in sisterly solidarity :))

Same here. Thousand pound excess and no doubt a hike in future premiums. They've done all the investigating, and now a company called GeoBear is going to inject some stuff beneath the bay to stablise it, meanwhile I have massive cracks right through to my living room, through which the wind is blowing :( https://www.geobear.co.uk/ After that it has to be rebuilt, and after that redecorated inside and outside. I gather that the stabilising should be done quite quickly, however due to the very hot summer and the number of insurance claims, the rebuilding and redecorating may take longer. Depending on what has caused the cracks, dickens, I wouldn't have thought it was much use just doing repairs to the cracks without addressing the cause as well? Or have I misunderstood your post?

KevC Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I?ve noticed a Martin Bailey on the Heber Rd > school site. > > Are you related to Julie Bailey? Eh?

I don't understand this. If the OP's car hadn't been off the road, would this man have been given a lift to Kings? And if so, what was the scam, exactly? Or was the man assuming that nobody would want to give somebody a lift at 6am?

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > there is NO deterrent There would be a deterrent if our police force hadn't been cut to the bone by government cuts.

Assuming you live in East Dulwich and he was going to Kings, the taxi fare is six pounds ....

Captain Marvel Wrote: --------------------------------------------- > > A crossing there, ensuring the safety of imaginary > pedestrians will make it unimaginably worse. Imaginary pedestrians? What do you mean? I would use it frequently and I know many others who would as well. I presently have to make a five minute detour to avoid having to try and cross the road there.

Those posts were from 2013.

Passiflora Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Southwark Council would have taken it away for you > for a lot less than that if you left it outside > and registered on the website! The OP said she knew the council would take it away if left outside, so presumably there was a reason why she couldn't leave it outside!

alex_b Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > First I would post on James (the new councillor's) > thread to see if he can nudge them to do their > job. Also I would phone first thing tomorrow > morning, ask to speak to a manager and say that > you're about to call your insurers who will pursue > the council for their costs. Having some potential > cost liability might focus their mind. > > If it doesn't then call your insurers and let them > fight with the council. But once insurers are involved you risk having your future premiums hiked.

I'm sorry to hear this, but we went in there for lunch shortly after it opened and came out (having eaten) still hungry. It seemed like a place for snacks rather than a meal? Not sure if that was the intention?

NewWave Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > This has really upset me. > He was a lovely man who introduced me to authors I > would not have otherwise have discovered. > so very sad so soon after his retirement. > He will be missed Even worse, he hadn't originally been planning to retire until next year I think.