cella

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Yeah. > You destroyed yuor own work there Cella, by gettin > that thread deleted. > Calling someone up on the validity of their > well-intended review / post was not useful and > scored very high on the @#$%&-o-meter. Predictable response from you KK. Without knowing any of the facts of course. Closed now.

I use the M&S in Victoria Station and last week a customer asking for assistance on a self serve till had to wait until the voices finished shouting their message before the assistance could hear her.

Admin deleted the thread at my request. There were personal issues at stake and also some bear baiting of the original poster. It probably wasn't doing the owner any favours either!

I suggested to Admin that for a range of reasons it was better to delete it. Don't think it was doing much for the shops marketing either.

If a GE is called we will undoubtedly end up with a disastrous coalition which would never work.

TheCat Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > cella Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > For the last time TheCat stop criticising women > > and adopt a more positive outlook. I'm not > feeding > > your habit after this. > > > HaHa...brilliant, now I know for sure that you are > just a wind-up merchant. > > I criticise 1 statement by 1 woman (well, i've > criticised you as well, so if you're a woman, that > makes two women i've criticized in this > thread)...and that means I need to 'stop > criticising women and adopt a more positive > outlook' > > Okay, sure. Well, I'm an immigrant, and you have > criticised me. So Cella, for the last time, you > really need to stop criticising immigrants and > adopt a more positive outlook. Your anti-immigrant > agenda is harmful and unproductive. > > see...we can all play this ridiculous game:) You and Philip Davies are cut from the same cloth. I'm hopefully right in that you don't have a partner so can feel free to indulge your rants.

teddyboy23 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Cat its not directed at you .its for my mate cella > .she had a pop at me on the brexit thread with a > Simula post You just need get a life or maybe learn to spell.

For the last time TheCat stop criticising women and adopt a more positive outlook. I'm not feeding your habit after this.

I thought so.

TheCat Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > cella Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Again no. A quick look at your posting history > > shows that you have a habit of starting threads > to > > stir up confrontation which you then back away > > from when others on here expose you. I used > > Rendelharris as an example of someone who was > > adept at sussing these things out and providing > a > > robust defence to support his counter > arguments. > > Honestly cella....you have to actually MAKE a > counter argument for me to even attempt to defend > my original post.... > > But as per most of your responses when called > out...you 'won't even bother as per' your normal > modus ooperandi > > Anyway, you successfully managed to hijack this > thread and draw me into a meaningless tit for tat. > So if you have something on the OP topic to add, > then I'll respond. Otherwise best to just leave it Actually, no I don't have to make a counter argument to your critical thread. I am allowed to criticise your criticism of women's issues. I have and I'm done.

malumbu Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > What's all this sycophancy towards Rendel? Fight > your own battles. And if others are being RRRSss > it's obvious for others to see. Well you should know. Won't even bother with this as per.

Again no. A quick look at your posting history shows that you have a habit of starting threads to stir up confrontation which you then back away from when others on here expose you. I used Rendelharris as an example of someone who was adept at sussing these things out and providing a robust defence to support his counter arguments.

TheCat Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Have had many good conversations with rendell on > this forum, on topics we agreed and disagreed on. > I don't in anyway recall ever being made into > 'mincemeat'.... But, in anycase, you could take a > leaf out of rendel's book, and learn how to > actually have a discussion/debate with someone who > might disagree with you with or see something > differently from you. > > Nah...you'd prefer to just sit in your echochamber > I guess....and when someone raises an issue which > is inconvenient for one of your preconceived > beliefs, you can then not even make an attempt to > address/discuss the issue, just brand them a > 'stirrer' and claim they're 'not worth investing > in' because it masks the truth that you actually > have nothing of any substance to add to the > discussion. Nope - you're not helping.

Nah - you're not worth investing in - just a stirrer. The much missed RendelHarris had your number all right and made mincemeat of you.

They are not a campaign group but a political party. Your whole tone is patronising and critical - why not be helpful and supportive if you genuinely care rather than nitpick.

Yes but where is the missing thread?!

Why so negative and not supportive - depressing. I was always taught to look at the person saying stuff and ask why they are saying it and it's stood me in good stead. There are so many bigger issues to be rightly concerned about and it's always tedious when anything women do for themselves is criticised in this way.

I saw a thread offering physio appointments last night and it seems to have gone ths morning as I can't seem to find! Did anyone else spot it?

Anti social behaviour happens in all cinemas in my experience, including ED Picturehouse.

Happy though surprised to have it in LL. However, with Argos at Sainsbury's too, just hope that this doesn't mean that the Peckham branches of both will disappear leaving a massive hole in the high street.

Really? First world problems!

Chantal You have posted in an inappropriate manner previously. This is very inappropriate when the original op is clearly distressed about her dog being attacked.

No you can't I'm afraid. Only local authorities, owners, police etc.

Sounds like you've ignored a lot. Maybe just pay the fine and learn from the experience rather than waste adrenaline fighting this one.

Why aren't people more supportive of those carrying out their job responsibilities? Maybe in this case a blind eye has been turned to certain parking issues but presumably the restrictions are there for a reason. And maybe you've got away with it for a very long time! Yes, Southwark need to look at increasing revenue but surely this sort of activity is fine?