cella

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > cella Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > DulwichFox Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > This is predictable and a deliberate Ploy on > > > behalf of Southwark Council. > > > > > > They will now set up Teams of Fly Tipping > > > Officers who will be out and about to catch > > garden > > > waste Fly Tippers > > > and Hand out Hefty Fines to make Southwark > > > Council a Fortune. > > > > > > Close down Public Toilets and Fine people > when > > > they Pee in the street. > > > > > > Get rid of Street Waste bins and Fine people > > when > > > they throw litter on the Pavement. > > > > > > Paint Yellow Lines everywhere and Fine > people > > > when they park and pop into a shop for 2 > mins. > > > > > > DulwichFox > > > > > > OTT response as per. Southwark like other > Councils > > clearly don't make a fortune and are forced to > > look at other income streams. Maybe some of > those > > fines should be introduced - > > urinating in the street maybe more than a fine > > I doubt that there is not one Policeman that has > never been in the same situation > with the need to go for a Pee where anyone else > would be arrested. > > DulwichFox Hate to break it to you but we are not living in Medieval times - we have facilities and everything now. We also have always had spreadable diseases and extreme bad behaviour but neither are compulsory. Why policemen? No answer required.

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > This is predictable and a deliberate Ploy on > behalf of Southwark Council. > > They will now set up Teams of Fly Tipping > Officers who will be out and about to catch garden > waste Fly Tippers > and Hand out Hefty Fines to make Southwark > Council a Fortune. > > Close down Public Toilets and Fine people when > they Pee in the street. > > Get rid of Street Waste bins and Fine people when > they throw litter on the Pavement. > > Paint Yellow Lines everywhere and Fine people > when they park and pop into a shop for 2 mins. > > DulwichFox OTT response as per. Southwark like other Councils clearly don't make a fortune and are forced to look at other income streams. Maybe some of those fines should be introduced - urinating in the street maybe more than a fine .

Tards?

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > fishbiscuits Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > uncleglen Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Quite a few UK politicians have not used > their > > given names > > > > > > https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/british-pol > > > iticians-real-names_uk_571f722ae4b06bf544e0be73 > > > > They're all using their given surname, and > either > > their middle name or a nickname as the first > > name. > > > > "Tommy" uses a completely made up name, so > quoting > > his real name alongside it seems fair. > > > > Are you sympathetic to his cause, uncleglen? > > According to Wiki (ermmm) "The name Tommy Robinson > is a pseudonym taken from a prominent member of > the "Men In Gear" (MIG) football hooligan crew, > which follows Luton Town Football Club.[38] The > member named Tommy Robinson wrote two books about > his 25 years of hooliganism" > "his cause"....all he has done is highlight the > activities of certain muslims ...if you wish to > learn more watch Three Girls the docudrama about > Rochdale groomers...on Netflix- and it was made by > the BBC...a 3 part mini series. And the perps are > STILL in the UK as they have a Human Right to a > family life according to the EC Hideous comments - not even a prerence this time. Maybe emboldened by a Boris/Trump world.

Hi James I've a massive exchange of emails with various Southwark staff about susscribing and then not getting a food waste bin to no avail. Each time someone different picks up the message, gives it a different job number and then nothing happens. Recently they've actually managed to remove both my blue recycling boxes despite me stating each time I did not want this to happen. We now only have one blue bin for both our flats. I've included Richard Livingston in several of my messages and he doesn't respond. Ive written to Caroline Bruce at the beginning of the week, copied to Peter John - nothing, not even an acknowledgement. Apart from the basic request which was checking on why the food waste bin hadn't been provided despite paying up, I think it's absolutely cynical and unprofessional for these people not to account to residents. Is there any way this can be resolved - the bin I mean, as I guess the accountability is a lost cause?

Billy installed a new boiler and radiators this week. He was efficient, helpful and courteous over the 3 day installation. A professional and reasonably priced service.

cella Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > VelvetBlueberry Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > cella Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > VB I would refer you again to > > > your other thread and suggest you read what > has > > > actually been said and what we were > responding > > to. > > > I haven't responded to your last few postings > > and > > > in the spirit of raising standards you may > wish > > > join us in adopting a more mindful way of > > > communicating. > > > > > > I literally just called you out for your > constant > > hypocrisy & you respond with yet another > > hypocritical comment - are you okay? You > clearly > > don't know the meaning of "mindful > communication" > > otherwise you wouldn't have entered a second > > thread made for a new business, derailing it > > before it's even taken off, after having the > > previous one closed for causing drama over > > positive feedback. Nobody does that unless > there > > is something mentally wrong with them. YOU need > to > > learn to be mindful & stop derailing threads. > > > > EDIT: as a side note, I think it would have > been > > great to have a block option on these forums; I > > would have used it so long ago . > > > > > > I agree with Frankito. I'm out. > > > I wasn't going respond to this but I have to take > issue with your language here. You have raised > mental health issues previously and also in this > post. I have always felt it necessary, like > others, to challenge the content of your posts > where appropriate and here it is really > inappropriate, in my opinion, to refer to mental > health in the way that you have. Here is your full post with the line you left out above. Enough now.

Yes! Have spotted Iain Glenn and also Owen Teale queuing together! Everyone I've said it to has asked what was in their trolleys!

VelvetBlueberry Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > cella Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > VB I would refer you again to > > your other thread and suggest you read what has > > actually been said and what we were responding > to. > > I haven't responded to your last few postings > and > > in the spirit of raising standards you may wish > > join us in adopting a more mindful way of > > communicating. > > > I literally just called you out for your constant > hypocrisy & you respond with yet another > hypocritical comment - are you okay? You clearly > don't know the meaning of "mindful communication" > otherwise you wouldn't have entered a second > thread made for a new business, derailing it > before it's even taken off, after having the > previous one closed for causing drama over > positive feedback. Nobody does that unless there > is something mentally wrong with them. YOU need to > learn to be mindful & stop derailing threads. > > EDIT: as a side note, I think it would have been > great to have a block option on these forums; I > would have used it so long ago . > > > I agree with Frankito. I'm out. I wasn't going respond to this but I have to take issue with your language here. You have raised mental health issues previously and also in this post. I have always felt it necessary, like others, to challenge the content of your posts where appropriate and here it is really inappropriate, in my opinion, to refer to mental health in the way that you have.

I think if you read his posting, Admin was addressing the comments on here from a variet of posters and of those, Sue and I have responded. Whilst it's true Louisa many on here continue to challenge your views imo rather than trolling you I personally can't recall commenting on any of your postings. I also don't understand your earlier comment. VB I would refer you again to your other thread and suggest you read what has actually been said and what we were responding to. I haven't responded to your last few postings and in the spirit of raising standards you may wish join us in adopting a more mindful way of communicating.

We can't know that. It would probably be a non workable coalition as mentioned further back on here. I'm not sure why die hard (presumably Brexit supporting) Tories would support either of those two parties. Remain Tories as a one off in the recent EU yes. The ones you refer to would be more likely to go to Farage.

Except that we are not necessarily getting the government and prime minister we want or deserve as there is no GE planned. The Conservatives are putting Party before country again imo and very probably putting an ill equipped person into the highest office. The electorate will have had no say in that process.

TheArtfulDogger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > To be honest, it doesn't matter who is the next PM > or which party would win a General election, > politicians are all from the same breed, hard, > self centred and in it for themselves not the > public > > I miss Screaming Lord Sutch and the Monster Raving > Loony Party - who strangely are still a political > party and were active in this years Peterborough > by election with thier candidate Alan "Howling > Laud" Hope > > Bless their Cotten socks That is clearly not the case. There are many committed, hardworking politicians at local and national level. Brexit has polarised us as a country and some are now more inclined to lump all elected representatives in together.

Not sure if you read the discussion earlier today but I'll leave it to others to decide.

Not sure these last two posts are in the spirit of earlier discussions today?

Not sure JC would be a disaster as PM - the difficult thing would be to win outright a GE - not sure anyone can. The worse outcome would be a coalition with Labour/Tories/Farage as nothing would get done. Also not sure what the position of the Brexit Party would be if Brexit ever actually happened - no other policies on anything.

I echo Sue's well phrased comments above. I agree it's easy to get fired up by threads on here sometimes. However it would be difficult, in my personal view to ignore some "challenging" posts and it wouldn't be right, again in my view, to give free rein to some views. However, I take the point that it's probably better to be mindful of questioning the comments rather than attacking the poster on occasion. I'm left unsure though what the red lines are as it feels like some exchanges on the EDF continue unabated and others, if enough protesters seemingly complain privately to Admin, are deleted.

I've seen fresh turmeric on a couple of the stalls along Rye Lane but can't remember which ones unfortunately.

It does seem a little dated. I guess it's possible to be retro without being Victorian maybe.

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I expect the RED shoes were borrowed from > Corbyn...Lorraine Kelly and her ignorant attitude > just about summed up the lefty stance for me. And > then our 'own' Jo Brand goes and finishes off the > REAL attitude of the lefty remoaners and commies - > what is she 'on'? Brain and gob link severed for > sure Mustn't... trying v hard to resist.....

VelvetBlueberry Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You wont find the thread because Cella had it > removed after accusing me of being the owner of Mr > Simm's Olde Sweet Shoppe based on a positive > review that just seemed too "enthusiastic" for her > liking. > > Nothing about my posts are "dubious". I'm honest, > I say it like it is & I have nothing but good > intentions. I'm not hiding behind a screen > insulting people left, right & center like the > regulars here can't seem to help but indulge > themselves in. > > A public forum it is, but it certainly isn't a > reflection of the East Dulwich community - I > should know being born here & working intimately > with residents on pretty much every street in > SE22. The administrator should consider renaming > this forum to something that wont tarnish ED. > > - Also, thank you to PR, tallulah & others for > stepping in ♥ Not sure anyone but the Admin has the power to remove your sometimes dubious posts. It's very easy to thank people who support you - less easy for you to own your dodgy posts. Think you said yourself someone you know had suggested privately about a perception by some that you are in any way connected to the shop owner so you might want to think again on that one. Maybe just give some thought as to whether any posts are offensive/judgy/classist etc before you say you don't think that's important.

Ghlpc Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I agree, but this section is general East Dulwich > issues and gossip is it not? > > Firstly what the OP highlighted was indeed that, > but has been allowed to derail into the usual > crap. > > Also I couldn't see anything in the post that > could be described as racist, homophobic or > misogynistic. > > It's a shame, as this could have bene a serious > debate about youth/bystander behaviour in E > Dulwich. > > And it seems happens with almost every post I read > on here! I was speaking more generally but VB does have a history of dubious posts on here.

This is a public forum and people are entitled to have differing views. It exists for locals to voice their opinions on a range of issues which are then up for debate. So if you post then maybe expect some challenge or indeed support but if posts are presented in what some consider to be racist, homophobic, mysoginistic etc then definitely expect to be challenged.

Don't think you were ever supposed to put food waste in your green bin...

It's not so much the advert but the insistence that time is running out for residents when actually the whole service has not been rolled out effectively!