KalamityKel

Maybaby Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > When I first read that quote, I thought it was > more of a definition for a secret society (and I > was tempted to post that!), however, I decided it > best not to give anyone any ideas. > > I wouldn't want The Grand Master to get > involved... There are eyes everywhere! :o

baron

Perhaps your feline chum has had an encounter with a curious child? Ours on occasion has returned home with his ears coloured in and extra stripes - the result of someone playing with a marker pen. Quite annoying and dangerous!

I'm still waiting to see what cella's point is... :)

find

bean

River

If people are going to discuss this topic openly please be respectful for the grieving family. They are local and I'm sure would not appreciate the ins and out of the incident to be pulled apart and even, by some, made fun of.

bels123 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > http://content.tfl.gov.uk/walking-cycling-economic > -benefits-summary-pack.pdf > > I wonder if the LL businesses have considered the > points raised here? A lot of positives if > customers walk/cycle v drive. That's all well and good IF customers will walk/cycle but the trend is still to drive - much like the school run (everywhere not just locally). You can't assume imposing any kind of parking restriction will make people change their habits.

It's interesting those in the sections that were resurfaced didn't get letters. I'm in the bit that didn't have any work done as was notified... Not quite sure what your reference to any proposed CPZ is all about nxjen mind.

See attached notification from Southwark Council back in October. There was no indication the whole of Lordship Lane was going to be resurfaced.

Further to my previous advice - if you have the chip number and have exhausted all possible avenues at changing the info do certainly give petlog a go. I recently updated chip info myself on a furry chum. Very straight forward and easy to do. RegMorley, we've tried near enough all the local vets over the years but always return to the one up the top of Lordship Lane - Medivet (has been called many things in the past). Always easy to get an emergency appointment or give information at late hours of where to go/what to do. You will always get mixed reviews from all places, but in my opinion Medivet is the best. Hope this helps.

mary123 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Local buses from Dulwich are very long and > guaranteed around an hour's journey minimum for a > 3 plus mile route.. it's a pain This has always been the case. It hasn't changed. It's not really so much a pain, you can at least plan for it. Granted if you're new to a particular route then it can seem a bit "really it takes this long?" but it can easily become part of the daily commute. Regarding the 185, if you're not a fan of waiting around or prefer to feel like you're making progress on your journey, bus hop. Get whichever bus comes along to Camberwell, then a choice of 185, 436 or 36 to Vauxhall and then whichever from there. It does feel like you're moving. Been doing this route the best part of 15 years.

Not wishing to start a whole debate or argument in any way but, out of curiousity, why would people be claiming compensation? :s

Your vet should have told you how to go about it - they can update details for you, or at least add a note to the chip - providing the feline chum has clearly been living with you for a significant amount of time like you say they have. In some cases too the chip can be replaced. We've had a similar thing although with the owners giving our beast over to us but never changing the chip details. I must stress though this is purely in instances where the furry friend has clearly moved in or owners have moved away/given up pet. This does not mean people (not you RegMorley) can claim any friendly visitor.

maxxi Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > KalamityKel Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > with a lounge bar upstairs (according to owner > > intentions are actually a ticketed nightclub) > and > > an icecream outlet to the rear on Chesterfield > > Grove - as per plans submitted to planning... > > Classy *sarcasm* > > Seriously? (The planning submission I mean) do you > have a link to the application? https://planning.southwark.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?keyVal=_STHWR_DCAPR_9579078&activeTab=summary

with a lounge bar upstairs (according to owner intentions are actually a ticketed nightclub) and an icecream outlet to the rear on Chesterfield Grove - as per plans submitted to planning... Classy *sarcasm*

ed_pete Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi - I'm trying to contact a new forum user about > a car they are selling. I've posted on their > thread and sent them two PM's but so far no > response - it doesn't look like they've accessed > the forum since posting the advert. Is it > possible to have their email address so that I > could mail them directly - I was wondering if the > EDF notifications are going to spam. > User is tlawless and this is their post. > > http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?9 > ,1959788,1959788#msg-1959788 I think you might already know the answer to the request for their email address Q... Giving personal info like that from one user to another without their knowledge/agreement is a no no. Looks like the person you are after has posting yesterday so maybe you've already had a response? If not be patient. Not everyone is online all the time to pic up messages/notifications.

Assuming you've reported it? If not... https://www.thameswater.co.uk/Help-and-Advice/Report-a-problem/Report-a-problem?type=leak

It's not THAT bad. It's predictable at least and doesn't take any extra time to journey... you just think it does.

Elphinstone's Army Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Chick Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > There are two things that no matter how I try I > > can?t understand. The trivial one is some > fashion > > of young men to walk around with their trousers > > hanging halfway down their bum. It?s > > uncomfortable and looks stupid. The other is > > teenagers ?self harming?. I knew lot?s of > > teenagers when I was one and never heard of > this. > > > > Don't you run a book group? and read yourself > presumably? Perhaps you don't know how to research > a subject, e.g. the correct use of an apostrophe, > or the origin of 'sagging' > > Sagging is an American hip hop affectation, which > is designed to cause the wearer to look tough and > hard, as one would expect anyone in a US jail, in > pants too large and no belt but with a swagger and > an attitude to look. > Unless of course you are Justin Bieber. > > Self harm is not a fashion, as has been pointed > out here by others,but a manifestation of self > loathing and unworthiness trivialised into > something generational which has by passed your > understanding or empathy. > > Am I correct in remembering that your book group > analysed and dissected 'Love in the time of > Cholera' - presumably showing insight and > intelligence - yet you open this bizarre thread at > a time when most people's valid concerns are : no > water, boiler malfunctioning, keeping warm, > running out of milk and Andrex, staying vertical > on treacherous pavements, childcare, flu, getting > to work, Dog Kennel Hill, barking dogs, cancelled > trains/flights/family visits, > all in exceptionally cold and disabling weather? > > fashions > lots > > > I just dont think it happened. Any ideas? And your point is?

Howl Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Disagree- no item comes with/is made smelling of > smoke. It?s absolutely a ?not as described? issue > and up to the seller to communicate. Just because > some sellers oblige on the smoke free home > point.... Could be argued that no item comes with/is made NOT smelling of smoke either... I'm not saying it's right to accept such an item but don't feel you can argue that it's not as described as it didn't say either way. As Growlybear says, lets hope the seller is reasonable and understands the gripe.

DOG KENNEL HILL, SOUTHWARK: Routes 40 176 185 484 are subject to diversion due to a road traffic collision. Route 484 curtailed to East Dulwich Roundabout. Routes 40 176 185 diverted via East Dulwich Road, Peckham Rye, Rye Lane, Peckham High Street and Camberwell Church Street to line of route on return buses are using Clayton Road, Hanover Park and Rye Lane.

Sue Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > KalamityKel Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Hoooooray!!!! > > > > "You could sit and eat your dinner outside > while > > the children played safely in the children?s > play > > area. Now there is absolutely nowhere for > children > > to run around. " > > How about the park... just across the road! > > > Why would you send your children to play out of > sight in a park across a main road while you were > eating? I think you missed the point Sue. Where did I suggest sending children to play unattended in another part of the world whilst parents/those responsible for children enjoyed their time in a pub? I didn't. My point was that if the OP was concerned there was no where to take the children in the area then they have missed the opportunity which is opposite the site in question. I don't agree with children in pubs - my own opinion, to which I'm entitled to and many would also agree. There are other places to go with children to dine whether it's with an outside space to let children run riot or not. Simple.

Hoooooray!!!! "You could sit and eat your dinner outside while the children played safely in the children?s play area. Now there is absolutely nowhere for children to run around. " How about the park... just across the road!