KalamityKel

I always thought Haart would make an ideal site for such eatery even when it was the Coop *nods head*

lulu Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Oh I can't think of anything more commercial or > ghastly! McD's? Or is that acceptable?

refusing to leave a store is not threatening? There are ways to get things done and that was not it. Why did the manager leave the situation to other staff? Did you accept the managers' departure or ask when they would be returning? Why did you have to get the exchange refunded elsewhere? Was it on principal or because you no longer required it? Currys/PC World/Comet and the likes are not known for their good customer service when it comes to complaints or returns but usually do manage to find a solution eventually - strange they went for offering you an exchange - which in their view this is what they did (a solution) even though not satisfactory to you. If you are not happy with the service you received you should follow their complaints procedure.

As usually results a fire. I'm sure you'll survive

This is almost as amusing as reading the comments submitted to the council! *yawns*

those teeny milk pots you get in a hotel room...

must u have one?

just what exactly is a "top person"? What kind of job is that? I'm blonde, mostly stoopid but this is surely taking the biscuit no? ;-)

rock

Two degrees in what?

Salsaboy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Went to the Waga in Bluewater last week. Awful. > Overpriced, formulaic gunk. They seem to have gone > way downhill from a couple of years ago. Won't be > going back. Ya see that's where you went wrong... Bluewater... What the...!!!

Seriously - if you're asking yourself this you've already answered the question. Sorry ETA (to avoid any assumptions I was being rude - I wasn't) - If you think something is not safe, as in you now have doubts about it, would you really be 100% happy to continue using it? Really 100%?

So what's the history behind ya name? I mean why choose that one? :)

darn u must be gifted!

Jumoak Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I saw the delectable Iain Glenn and the woman who > plays Eastender's Shirley in Sainsburys (she is > tiny!) and Kate Ford (in one of the many Lordship > Lane cake shops) who was rather rude with her > bugaboo, expecting us to move out of her way > without grateful acknowledgement! Cake shops on Lordship Lane? Many too? Are we talking about the same Lordship Lane?

haha that told u! sorry... chuckling here. so the power cut wasnt for too long? :-)

Have we relocated to Canterbury or is ed REALLY the place to "be"? ;-)

i had troubles all wkend back now tho...

anyone would think the meeting time and place, incidentally where all other such decisions across the borough are made, is planned deliberately to upset ed residents... y should this one application be any different to others eh?

whilst there have been a vast number of objections that wouldnt necessarily mean an automatic refuseful. not only would the objections be judged to be relative to the application issues theyd also need to concern the licensing objectives and based on that. its not a simple case of sorting thru a yes no pile there are rules and if those objections dont effect the objectives then they wont count. the establishment also have the opportunity thruout he application to respond to objections both to those objecting and to the council again, changing the possible outcome. so its not a simple case of saying there are so many objections so it will obviously be refused as its not how things r done. the establishments "lack of involvement on this thread" is very wise. the edf is not an official platform for such things and as popular as the edf if it does not represent everyone in ed or the surrounding areas.

Champ Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Clearly, there are lots of ultra sensitive people > around, Best quote I've seen in AGES!!!! Clearly!

Now now that's not particularly a fair thing to say... it would seem there is/was (I don't know where they're at with the idea of moving on) no choice... however as you've clearly pointed out as have I and others to which this application effects the choice/selection/wishes of which store occupies the site is not the question

It's tick boxes... sadly there's no thinking (using ones brain) envolved in the processes these days!

I don't think it was just there the noise fell... LL seemed to be rather active way in to the early hours...

Just out of curiousity how much did you discuss your childs condition with the establishment concerned? I mean obviously each child with such diagnosis if different - did you go in to much detail?