Undisputedtruth

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Cool. > > I quite fancy getting something like this, and > fitting it with modern electronics: > > http://www.bethanydesign.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/ > 2011/08/Radiogram.jpg It's about time M&S revamp their audio stocks.

Rupert Murdoch and Hugo wants you to pay more for your internet services

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Its occured to me that he might not just walk back > into the 1st 11 teamsheet if the others do the > business. It has also occurred to me that I may have spotted another Alan Medic spelling error.

Apparently not too far away in SE23.

I was impress with Deptford High Street when I was there a few weeks ago. They have about four excellent Oriental grocery shops and some art venues. I also liked their train carriage conversion to a cafe.

The Irish were pretty poor and I can't see them progressing. I suspect Italy and Spain will aim to improve their goal difference when playing against them though.

This is a duplicated thread. See here.

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > What was the lesson? A football lesson is a common term used in football when a team gets well beaten. It seems there is no end to you talking nonsense as demonstrated in the Pirate Bay thread. You've no idea about football but yet you felt the need to give your own version of what footballing lesson means. This is *Bob* like behaviour. ;-)

Pot calling the kettle black

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > However, it appears that despite founding > Microsoft, Google and BitTorrent, your colleagues > have poorly briefed you on Net Neutrality. Please > take the time to research it more fully. > > Or do I take it that your resort to 'blah blah > blah' comments means that you have researched it > and discovered that you don't know what you're > talking about? I've been reading 'net neutral' articles over a number of years. Not sure why you think I'm being briefed by colleagues. After all, I was the first person on this thread to mention 'net neutrality'. Just because I don't agree with your distorted view net neutrality that doesn't mean I don't understand the issues. All what you're doing is standing on a soap box shouting all kinds of insults and garbage in the hope of justifying greed to the don't know any betters. I don't think you know when to quit. It's a bit like watching the bankers letting go of their bonuses. Greed, greed, greed.

I detected a sense of arrogance behind the "progressive planning policies". The locals were not consulted over the proposals. The Chair of Lewisham planning committee, Nicholas Taylor, expressed his amazement to why locals refused to move to tower blocks. Even call them ungrateful. The government often talks about breakdown in familiy values but their policies often plays a pivotel role. Free market, anyone?

woodrot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > your posts are taking on a shrill hysterical bent > bludz, hence the repeated tiger posts > > This thread isnt about the legitimacy or not of > copyright, but the ability of individuals or > corporations to block access on a nationwide > scale > > I opened the thread to discuss this particular > development innit +1 (tu)

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sure you can argue for net neutrality, but as you > do, US based companies are @#$%& you up your dim > witted arse. Content is king as they say. An ISP is dead in the water unless they have access to content. So without net neutrality, these companies are only going to get stronger as they agree contracts involving unfair practices to their competitors. I don't believe you thought this through, bollox brain.

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I shall now leave you to your bunch of arse > because all of the issues have been adequately > explored, and I'm sure people will make up their > own min Only those who don't know any better will agree with you, Hugo.

Jason, this is a duplicated thread. See here.

Yep, watching too much tv!

Great programme. It goes to show how overdevelopment causes destruction to community, local economy and history. Jeremy take note.

Proper footballing lesson here:

woodrot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Proof indeed that living in a police state does > indeed get to you eventually *ROFL* :)):)):))

Absolutely, in fact SAF backed Rio for Euro 2012 last month.

I assume you've not read this: http://foodsthatkill.wordpress.com/tag/marks-and-spencer-sandwich/ or ths http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/lifestyle/food-and-drink/mamps-sandwiches-have-more-fat-than-big-mac-and-chips-13921263.html

Iceland is now in a far better position to negotiate a new lease after a managagement buyout completed back in mid February and its own future secured. Everyone, whatever their income group is, has a right to use their local high street. @jumpingbean I like to see a Waitrose store in SE London at some point.

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Absolutely - and you wouldn't see me complaining > about a loss of freedom if the opportunity was > shut down. > That isn't loss of freedom, it's copyright infringement, and you know it too, Hugo.

Blah, blah, blah.

I know, uncommon territory in supporting a good cause, Loz. ;-)