Undisputedtruth

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVZenvieJ4E&feature=player_embedded I ROY - Sister Maggie Breast http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRJW05wVOLc&feature=player_embedded Dennis Brown - Wolves and Leopards Two tunes I used to listen a lot during my youth.

Thanks for showing support SGS. No one should ever have faced the insults I've suffered here.

no, I'm not a tory because they have no sense of social justice whatsoever. I remembered her house which was off Dulwich Common. Land was taken from the sports ground where I used to play football and used for developments. I do not affiliate myself to any political parties and didn't vote in the last election as all the political parties were not worthy in my opinion.

Marmora Man Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > UDT - to misquote an American politician "I knew > Thatcher - Milliband ain't no Thatcher" And that's a good thing.

prickle Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Why is Southwark not a member of London Libraries > Consortium? I find the selection of books > available in our local, Grove Vale, disappointing > and have been turned down when I suggested that > they buy a particular book. With LLC I believe you > can order books from any one of the libraries of > around 12 london boroughs. They arrive swiftly. My > Wandsworth friend speaks very highly of the > service. Last there were articles in the press about having the GLA being put in charge of all the libraries in London and saving money by cutting out the senior mangement. The LLC sounds like a very good idea and I think there other consortium groups around London. I tend to feel Southwark libraries are against users, wanting more choice, from ordering books outside the borough. The high inter-library loan fees charged by Southwark, in my view, also reflects that. @celebrationoftheyear - Thanks for reporting back. Does

Did the questionnaire included questions about the back office functions?

Southwark Council's libraries do hire out their halls http://www.southwark.gov.uk/info/200062/libraries/913/library_fees_and_charges/2 . Moving on, as a last ditch option community run libraries seems a worthy alternative to closing down libraries. Next, I suspect Southwark Council would be looking at putting coffee shops in their biggest libraries. From the youtube links supplied by James, it seems there is a huge potential for savings by reviewing the back office functions.

As you've been so dismissive in the past then my final answer is no. In any case I have a fair understanding of the Equality laws/policies so I won't benefit in doing research for you.

It's about time you do your own research on private sector pay. I've already answered your other questions relating to the public sector in full. Pretty pointless comparing unemployment rates by gender. Benefit rules and child caring responsibilities can distort the unemployment rates.

Loz Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > But isn't it unfair to examine *changes* to public > spending without examining public spending as a > whole. For instance, the part of the Fawcett > Society complaint was that cutting back public > service jobs affected women more as they made up > something like 70% of PS employees. But surely > that means that women are unfairly benefitting > from PS spending as a whole? > > Statistics, eh? Not really, 50% of Public Sectors employees earns less than ?21000 pa and it could be argued that women forms a higher proportion of low income earners.

I tend to find the word 'chav' completely meaningless when someone applies it to fashion labels. Lacoste, if my memory serves me right, was always seen as a better label than Fred Perry, but their products are no longer made in France and I've heard their quality has gone down hill. Fred Perry polo tops are okay but the material lacks the same thickness as the Lacoste's. Burberry is okay but I wouldn't buy their stuff as I think there's better quality/price elsewhere. The Trench coats are regarded as the finest but the fit doesn't suit me.

I won't accept the congratulations as you've seemed to missed the main gist of my post and that belonging to Quids. As a soul boy I know exactly what Quids was saying and I know the period from 79-82 was a great time for Soul, Jazz & Funk music. Also, at the time reggae was just as popular. I'm against commercial tosh like the Guardian, M&S, Starbucks Coffee, and pop music.

It still early days for Milliband and has plenty of time to forumulate his policies. It's worth mentioning that Margaret Thatcher had a very poor start when she became the opposition leader for the Tories.

I don't believe there's a market where people want to pay ?25/50 per hour for an event involving library books. Also, the Council needs to be mindful not to undercut or put out of business other community groups' hiring out their halls.

Fuschia Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If the upstairs room at dulwich isn't used weekend > afternoons I wonder if library book themed parties > could be offered I suspect the main problem with this idea is that it would distract staff undertaking a front line service and incur extra costs at a time when Southwark Council is trying to balance the books.

I listened to a few bits of reggae, including lovers rock like Carol Thomspon, though I can't remember much now. Definitely missed the pirate stations like Horizon, JFM, Kiss.

???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Undisputed truth is a Soulie...my oh my I decided to take the name of The Undisputed Truth soul group as it sounded so great. I'm stunned how many people on this forum got the wrong idea about my name. Anyway, as youngster I stopped listening to Radio 1 since their music was naff and my interest in quality music just grew and grew. I was heavily into club, jazz funk soul music during the early 80s and bought a number of records on imports. In some cases I could recognise producers or musicians signature notes. I tend to view m&S and the Guardian in the same way as I did with Radio 1. With the Guardian newspaper I know I won't get quality information that I want and with M&S they can't offer me the quality of food I wish to eat. I feel privileged that I can make my own choices without relying on marketing or journalists gibberish. I tend to feel sorry for those who live their life according to the Guardian or what's on tv.

Ain't Huguenot the chow wow is very touchy today

*woof woof* :))

kleinhond Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > James Brown, Bob Dylan, David Bowie, Kate Bush, > Nina Simone, Bryan Ferry The Nunhead Forum must be very quiet, KH. Anyway, musical genius for me would be George Clinton, Prince, Stanley Clarke, Roy Ayres, George Duke, Idris Muhammad, Norman Whitfield who also produced the Undisputed Truth, Patrice Rushden, Larry Heard, Lamont Dozier, Donald Byrd, Herbie Hancock, etc.

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > A couple of corrections to the debate that have > been helpfully sent to me: > "The fee charged in Southwark is 50p if a book is > already in stock somewhere in the borough. If the > book has to be purchased or obtained from another > authority, or the British Library then we charge > ?2 per item. These are some of the lowest charges > in London, for example Bexley charges ?3 for books > not in stock in the borough and an additional ?10 > for a British Library loan, Croydon charges ?3.50 > and ?12.60 respectively. Hi James, I'm not quite sure what you are correcting here. As I rightfully said before Southwark charges ?2 to order books through the inter library loan. To say the inter library loan starts from 50p is untrue. Last year Lewisham charged 50p for each book I ordered through the inter-library loan and took a few weeks to arrive from other local authorities. I strongly disagree that Southwark has the lowest library charges in London. Michael

SGS Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "As for plans how about we get UnreliablePrejudice > on the moderators panel." > > Which presumably means that you think moderators > are there to control and edit opinion to meet > their own political ends, regardless of their own > dishonesty? > Actually it would means some line Chow Wow Huguenot wouldn't get away with writing such cr@p. I'm amused by the word UnreliablePrejudice just for expressing my dislike for m&s and the Guardian. Very typical in how Huguenot talks nonsense and uses colourful words as camouflage but when you start to analyse them they are completely meaningless. Unreliable Prejudice are double negative words which means nothing just like many of Huguenot the chow wow's posts.

Hi KH, I wouldn't worry too much about what Huguenot had wrote. He's all mouth no substance once you analyse his messages. As you are the admin for Nunhead Forum, it seems you must be bored because no one hardly posts there anymore. UDT

Huguenot reminds me of one of those annoying chow wow dog which would bark above its weight and leave sh1t all over the place. Stick its nose in someone's behind.

http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,693370 The document is definitely worth a read. I would imagine a lot of East Dulwich people shopped in Rye Lane during its heyday. Hopefully, once the Peckham Town centre get going again, the area would then attract better shops. Can someone merge the two threads together please?