I cannot understand the bleeding heart liberal leanings of some people on here, who would rather protect some undeserving low life troublesome stalker who has put absolutely nothing into the society which they live, other than costs of housing feeding, and defending when they eventually get to court for their anti-social behaviour. My sympathy lies with Jimmytwotimes when he was desperate there was no support from the council where as if he had been like the intimidating nutter he would have got housed no question. Asset and Annaj and Chav defended this creep and all credit to them for their humanity, but he has not lived as their close neighbour, and they have not been stalked to their home, or sat next to him on the bus and been intimidated by the obnoxious lout like many have. As resources are finite I would rather Jimmytwotimes was served positively by the welfare state, than the antisocial asbo collectors who in my mind should be put to work helping in the community rather than fragmenting it by their disgraceful carryings on. The chances are the ones who have just left Whateley rd have probably been re-housed on several occasions and have received more than their fair share of commitment from the council. In my opinion once they have been housed and then they lose it for their misbehaviour, that house should be given to the Jimmytwotimes variety of individual who needs a helping hand, and the once in his life time need is taken care of. Otherwise the system seems to encourage outrageous behaviour. Sorry if I come over as a "total tool" Keef which incidentally made me laugh out loud, and its making me chuckle as I write we shall just have to agree to differ. I am all for the welfare state where deserving cases are looked after, but not for the individuals who make a career of being anti-social.