ooh do I not like being called inarticulate.... I think I have said before that I am not black and white on the issue. But being local-shop biased (rather than anti-chain) has nothing whatsoever to do with an anti-capitalist stance and to portray it as such is at best cheeky and at worst... well very bad indeed ;-) And it also needs stating that we are in agreement on local business not necessarily being any good. Some are god-awful Also a point that needs clarifying - independant versus chain. Another blind alley.... Yes business start off small and expand to other outlets so they are in effect a chain. But for the sake of my argument, by chain-store I mean the mega-big, ubiquitous operations.. k? k So why am I reluctant to embrace them? Even if they can do somethings better. Many reason 1) - any town where they dominate. Many of us have lived in these places. And left. Because they aren't nice places - with the life sucked out of them and the blandalanda aspect of each and every highstreet 2) And this might sound anti-capitalistic but isn't. The mega stores are very efficient at sucking money out of producers/suppliers and local communities and syphoning up to Offshore Tax Haven #57575677 (or, if you prefer tax dodging welfare parasites) and also explains why the rest of us are left scrabbling for loose change (in wages for example) I want people to make money - but I want it to be you, me, that woman down the road with the interesting ideas on Reiki This Warehouse business that's opening up seems like a good example (of the Good variety) 3) A bad local business is bad but responsible to the local community. A bad HQ based business has no link whatsoever. Nor does a good HQ based business for that matter 4) Chains are stifling competition not promoting or aiding it. See my comment about most high streets in the country for proof. ED ain't perfect but we take what we have for granted at our peril