>Tbh it was a stupid appointment by the board. Johnny Giles wanted the job, the other senior players wanted him to have it, >Revie wanted him to have it and yet they gave the role to a man who had spent years slagging off Leeds as dirty cheaters >to anyone who would listen. Not clever. Clough was hardly unique in holding this opinion of Leeds. That was the general reputation they had at that time, and by and large it was pretty well deserved. Yes Eddie Gray and Peter Lorimer were sublime - but Hunter's reputation was well-earned, as was Jack Charlton's. So, internal appointments like Giles apart, any new, eligible appointment would have arrived with this opinion of Leedstoo, admittedly not broadcasted so loudly as Clough's >The subsequent decline lay more in the once-in-a-generation quality of senior players who were all coming to the ends of >their careers. Although Clough went on to build European Cup winning teams at Notts Forest I'm not sure he would have been >capable of such a task at Leeds. Well we shall never know of course, but you can see how this very reputation would make it tempting to appoint him to rebuild a successful side with so many stars ageing together. Clough & Taylor were easily the best team for this task on the face of it. And if Clough "liked a bung" I doubt he was much different to many other managers of this period: it seems to have been part and parcel of the whole subculture. He certainly was no different to the famously grasping Revie in this respect. Just before Leeds appointed Clough Sheffield United needed a new manager. It was pointed out to some Blades board buffoon by the local press that Clough was available and this idiot gave a knowing superiro laugh and said words to the effect "Oh rest assured we won't be appointing him!". The atttitude sickened me, espcially when Forest went on to win all those trophies whilst the Bramall Lane trophy cupboard remained - remains! - quite bare.