Sandperson

Me too. It lulls you bin dippers into a false sense of security...:))

Anna, we still have a fiar few to come back into the team. Don't worry about us too much just yet.

Arsenal 2 West Brom 1 Bolton 1 Stoke City 0 Everton 1 Blackburn 0 Hull City 0 Fulham 1 Middlesbrough 0 Tottenham 2 Sunderland 0 Liverpool 2 West Ham 0 Wigan Athletic 0 Aston Villa 1 Man City 1 Chelsea 2 Portsmouth 0 Man Utd 2 Newcastle 1

Annasfield Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Arsenal 2 West Brom 1 > Bolton 2 Stoke City 0 > Everton 1 Blackburn 0 > Hull City 0 Fulham 1 > Middlesbrough 1 Tottenham 3 > Sunderland Liverpool - You know I don't answer > that one ;-) > West Ham 1 Wigan Athletic 0 > Aston Villa 2 Man City 2 > Chelsea 2 Portsmouth 2 > Man Utd 2 Newcastle 0* > > *Go on Keegan, prove me wrong (please) Shouldn't that be 'I would love it....'?

I hope you are right Jah but we've 'cursed' our fair share of great strikers.

Jah Lush Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Annasfield Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Today's rumour/gossip is linking us with Joe > Cole. > > I would love it if he came to Liverpool. (tu) > > I really rate him and think he's a terrific > player. Would really like him at Tottenham. > > Looks like Berbatov is finally getting his wish > and going to Man Utd. Boo hiss... But is he worth ?28M?

Totally unbelievable. The whole game beggars belief tbh. Aren't Chelsea talking about ?78M for Kaka. What will his weekly wages be? Ronaldo wanted ?120,000 plus. ?13,000 is jobbing wages in the Championship now isn't it?

An interesting precident? ?4.5M for a broken leg

Hmm, been around for a week or two now as Spurs are holding out. I don't believe it myself but it'd be interesting. Personally thought that Nani, Fletcher and Campbell (Fraiser) looked good enough yesterday to create/score. No doubt we need another striker but I'm not sure if we are too desperate.

Annasfield Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sandperson Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Annasfield Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > > > > Interesting that the ref "missed" Tevez > raising > > > his hands, although as much as I hate to say > it > > > the better team did win. > > > > Interesting how the ref "missed" the rugby > tackle > > by Herman too. > > > > Up the plastics! > > > ================================================== > == > > And Tevez trampling all over him. Oh well. That's right! He was supposed to defy gravity! Plastics forever Ratty!

Annasfield Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > Interesting that the ref "missed" Tevez raising > his hands, although as much as I hate to say it > the better team did win. Interesting how the ref "missed" the rugby tackle by Herman too. Up the plastics!

I'm in. humiliation awaits.

I always said Ronaldo was a good lad.....

One for the Charlton fans: Is Matty Holland STILL playing?

Were you about to say the three magic words Bon3yard? "Top four place"

A friend of mine worked on one of those undercover programmes on the subject of the Royal Mail. I seem to remember that there was an unofficial policy at the time that if the RM were using temp staff to do deliveries (which they do when they need extra cover during holiday periods) they weren't allowed to carry or deliver parcels and they were told to just fill out the red slips and post them instead. I believe it was in order to cut down on dodgy temp staff nicking stuff.

Jamma Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I hope you're right about Pardew bringing a decent > team. Is he bringing Man Utd then? Sorry I couldn't resist...

Jamma Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I hope you're right about Pardew bringing a decent > team. Is he bringing Man Utd then? Sorry I couldn't resist...

I got as far as good luck. I'll take that thanks Ratty.

Annasfield Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sandperson Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Ok, ok, one rule for us etc etc. I see where > this > > is going. Of course you are right Anna, forgive > me > > for even arguing. > > > I'm glad you get my point and I accept your > apology. ;-) I'll have you know I have huffed off. I am, at this very moment in time, tying a red handkerchief with white polka dots onto a stick and will throw this over my shoulder and go off in search of a forum where everyone thinks Man Utd are great....so there!

Ok, ok, one rule for us etc etc. I see where this is going. Of course you are right Anna, forgive me for even arguing.

Sorry Anna, but you are talking rubbish. The situation is not the same at all.

Come on Anna! How is that remotely like the Real Madrid/Ronaldo affair? So, we put in an official bid, negotiations are on-going and Fergie is confident that we'll get him. That's not the same as Real talking up the fact that Ronaldo is coming to them, wants to come to them, will deffo be a Real player and them not actually putting any money on the table or making any official approach. I think you are being a bit disingenuous. The Real policy, much like Barcelona, is the same year in, year out. It's a systematic undermining of clubs and players and it's usually tied in with the club presidential elections and used as a tool to make the candidates more popular (usually through papers like Marca, which are effectively just a mouthpiece for the clubs). How many times over the last decade have we heard rumours about players that were going to be playing for both of these clubs, without a doubt, and the deal is never struck. It's brinksmanship.

I can't find the interview on The Sun (I'm guessing this is the paper) so can't comment. But I wouldn't believe anything you read in that rag.

Annasfield Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Fergie did a little more than admitting interest > though. I didn't read his interview as it was in > said paper which I will never read let alone > mention, however from what I can gather he said > they'd get him. Very hypocritical me thinks. > > The whole rule is rather peculiar. And Liverpool aren't? Spurs just reported them for a laugh, right?