KidKruger

dulwichbloke - yeah I got the impression that the freeholders have already said ?nah? and have assumed there?ll be a trace of that to show.

In small claims it?s all about what?s reasonable to expect, they understand you?re not a lawyer and cannot express your case as if you were a lawyer. Outline the basis of your claim and refer to any factual evidence you can bring along to accompany it, they know you will be representing yourself. Whoever you?re claiming against can bring along whoever they want - that?s their cost (and their problem / decision-point based on how convinced they are in their side of the argument). Common for chancers to back-out with an offer of some kind before the case, often very soon before case is heard. More detail you have, the better. The way you?ve explained the lease states freeholder responsibility says it all for me, sounds like freeholder is calling your bluff from what you say. If you?re confident go to small claims, don?t even threaten just do it.

I?d go small claims court with freeholder and based on outcome deal with respective lawyers accordingly.

If the lease says it?s freeholder?s responsibility, that?s it isn?t it - in the contract ?

Hmmmm... Why live in one place and have your post delivered to another address ? I would contact council if you think it may be a council property and advise of sub-letting, also mention the post delivery situation and absence of lady in property. If you have evidence of paying rent that will be useful. I would check land registry (I think ?5, and I think it shows if property mortgaged, which bank/building society to) then write to lender asking if they know about the letting / tenancy you are having issues with. I would file at small claims court and, as details of above two items come to light, use the information from each (if useful) as input to your case. Do them all now, regardless, get your money back and still show her she?s out of line, no need for threats just crack on. When you?re done, smash the telly and stick it up her nose.

KidKruger Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Why should working class be buying bourgeois confection ? Fishbiscuits wrote: ?There should be no bourgeois confection at all. In fact, any sweets invented after 1979 should be viewed as Thatcherite artifacts, and mandatorily melted down. Chocolate shall be free from branding and made strictly to a state-mandated recipe.? Oh well fair play seeing as you put it like that.

I can imagine 6 dogs barking at the same time but, having used Nunhead cemetary for 5yrs, have never actually seen 6 dogs being unloaded when ALL 6 are barking at the exact same time. That would be some coincidence, especially if the dogs are walked daily together and have a settled relationship with one another. I can imagine it, but not recurring - that would seem a trifle strange IMO.

Why should working class be buying bourgeois confection ? Everyone should be entitled to everything - same with cars, houses, clothes ? I?m sure there?s a word for that belief system.

Ha ha Daily Mail used as a reference to back up a point !!! Laughed my tits off....!

Paste the pics on lamp posts. The police will do sweet FA.

I?d show the photo to Patel?s, across road from Lyla?s jewellery shop, if they?re Gujuratis he may know them. Same in other Newsagents / shops.

It?s a hassle, but hire the gear and do it yourself over a weekend at your own pace, going over it as many times as you see fit until satisfied.

A link to a pay site ?!

Yeah there's a whole area (most of the Western side of GG) cordoned off for the tree operation. Where will the poor souls buying trees park, if they're coming by car ?! I did wonder as I passed the cordoned area, whether it was being set up for cars to come actually onto the green - which I hope is not the case.

And now another celebrity death..

Silk Road: I think the guys running the place are Han Chinese, not Uighers. Though the Xinjiang province is where the Uighers mainly are.

Silk Road Camberwell, though from a different region in China than other restaurants.

Prices won?t be rising in the new year, there is no reason likely for the conditions to be in place and enable that.

I suppose the obvious question is, if you don?t like it what would you do or what exactly do you want (with examples) ?

breakfast time for sure, I even said to a bunch of them a few weeks ago in Johnnies, "of course, THIS is why there are so police on LL this morning - full English !".

?I'm sure KK had a reason for posting ,I'm also sure that the woman isn't someone random to him .? 1. I'm sure KK had a reason for posting. Correct, hopefully that?s clear in my OP ! 2. I'm also sure that the woman isn't someone random to him. Incorrect. The street-fouler was random to me until that day. Let?s not confuse Netflix with the real world !

The poo was light-brown and had sweet corn in it. What further ?proof? does anyone need ?!

?KK You?ve got it wrong this time. And I think you know it.? I don?t think so, and you don?t know anything about what I know. You weren?t there witnessing, I was. I?m calling-our a street fouler publicly. Your implication is that I am carrying out a behaviour that I know is wrong, that is simply not the case. Admin - fair play, your call.